Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
steve said in one of the keynotes that apple builds products and software they use themselves and they dont like ads "so lets dont have ads".
Steve also said "You know the ads on the web — they’re eye catching and interactive, but they don’t deliver emotion. What we want to do with iAd is deliver interaction and emotion." The idea: by integrating high-quality, interactive ads inside apps on iOS devices, Apple aimed to build a new revenue stream for itself and for app developers. This is from an article about Apples development of iAds from Business Insider April 8, 2010 written by Leander Kahney. Apple for a long time has looked for ways to raise revenue and give the larger chunk to Developers. If you remember iAds was a 60/40 spilt with Apple getting the 40.
 
Apple will not get a single cent more from me no device purchases or subscriptions if this happens, as the reason I switched to Apple is for privacy.

Eventually they will want to please shareholders more, so they will want to increase the „effectiveness“ of the ads for which they will start tracking users more.
 
Waze it is then. At least they only have ads when you are stopped…………… although I think Google Maps does not have any? Ironically. Could be wrong though so may be worth using them.
 
Last edited:
It will be a big mistake when Apple Maps (or any other Apple app) pushes ads (pop-ups, banners or complete advertorials) when just browsing the map. The only "ad" that would be OK, is an ad that appears when you deliberately have put in a search for a product or location. Or just small icon dot with a name on the map, nothing else. It has to be visible, but subtle. Something like Furkot does.

Google Maps or Waze then
Waze? Nope... it often got me illogical routes (sometimes even roads that have been closed more than a year ago) and outdated location information. Google is more up to date when it comes to location info. But Apple Maps, Google and Waze are horrible in avoiding traffic jams. Only TomTom (devices) is king in avoiding heavy traffic. Tried it many times, side-by-side and with two vehicles.

My best combination for travel (including road trips) is Google Maps for finding out information on locations, Furkot for long distance planning and my TomTom device while on the road.

Waze it is then. At least they only have ads when you are stopped…………… although I think Google Maps does not have any? Ironically. Could be wrong though so may be worth using them.
Google pushes those who pay the most in location searches and sometimes vaguely related stuff too. During navigation there's no ad. But it wouldn't be surprising if the calculated routes sometime deliberately pass some companies that pay a bit more. In some regions we saw the commercial parking garages much easier on the map than the free ones.
 
Last edited:
Of course they are.
Next is to charge for it.
Eventually every app will have a monthly fee...but hey worry not, it's only .99 cents a month.
 
It is “journalist” Mark Gurman who is reporting this, the same guy who claimed the iPad Pro M5 would get 2 front facing camera’s and also has been claiming for years that a touchscreen MacBook is coming soon…

He's right much more often than wrong. Besides this is a report, not a speculation.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: p.willis
Waze has ads and are owned by Google so having it on your phone they know and sell to advertisers every move you make
I know, here's my logic, what advantage does apple maps now have? None, its doing the same thing as waze while providing an inferior service to my needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
Apple Maps already selectively shows me data that I don't need or want. Not sure that the algorithm is, but it is terrible. We don't eat at fast food restaurants, but that is all we get on Apple Maps. Ever try to find a good, non-chain restaurant on Maps. Not possible without a ton of work. The place I'm searching for is always that little dot that, no matter how much I zoom in, never gets expanded so I can see the name.

I don't think having "pay for placement' is going to be much worse than it is now.

What we really need is a way to set search preferences. For example, "Never show McDonalds", "Never show Arbys", etc.

This would work exactly like ATT does with spam calls. ATT charges the spammer, then gives me an app that eliminates spam. The perfect solution for Apple.
 
....

These days I find 99% of all the ads irrelevant, and for the leftover 1% - there is 0.001 probability I will think about buying a product they promote, and not necessarily from them, i.e. it would work as “reminder”, like “oh, herbal tea, right! I need this, not this one though.”.
....
You're just not giving up enough personal data. If you did, the Ads would be nearly perfect. This is your fault, not the Ads fault. 😂
 
Is this really necessary? Criticizing his decisions is fine (I do all the time), but this?

I am glad that you said something. I have too many infraction points against me so one more and I will be banned but this sort of thing is why I post here so little. I have placed so many people like this on ignore but they seem to pop up again like weeds.

I wish these accounts would be banned but that never seems to happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: foggygray
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.