Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Really Apple? Your already the largest company in the world. Now you are going to stop your suppliers from doing business with the competition? I think this might be taking it too far.

Do you own a business? Would you let your suppliers work for your competition and copy your product? Really? :confused:
 
I'm not buying this.

I think it would be anti-competative behavior which opens Apple up to serious problems. So the risk-reward ratio isn't good: The Zenbook isn't going to have a significant effect on the MBA sales regardless. So why would Apple put itself in such a bad position to temporarily squash it?
 
I've used these clones at my local Microcenter. They really are garbage and only suckers would purchase them. Screens are dim, keys feel flimsy, build quality just isn't there.

But it's also ridiculous they have to carbon copy the looks of apple.
 
Relax, this happens all the time. Bakeries make contracts with malls to restrict the amount of bakeries in that mall. Coca Cola makes contracts with schools to get exclusive rights to those schools.
And this helps your case how?

Do you really think these are produced by panda bear breeding, rose cultivating Greenpeace activists that serve their employees coffee at the conveyor belt, and have a dog walking service for dog owning employees?
You're not used to debating adults, are you?


Conclusion: if you disagree with these kind of practices and vote to not use those products than you will have to live in an igloo in greenland with clothes made out of leaves, as this is how the world works now. Welcome to the consumer oriented and driven world.
So, our choices are either blind consumption or Cro-Magnon man? What kind of screwy logic is that?
 
I'm not buying this.

I think it would be anti-competative behavior which opens Apple up to serious problems. So the risk-reward ratio isn't good: The Zenbook isn't going to have a significant effect on the MBA sales regardless. So why would Apple put itself in such a bad position to temporarily squash it?

It has nothing to do with how many they will sell. They are not even telling Azus to stop making them. They are telling the company go with them or us. If they want they can go with ASUS and Apple will find someone else.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

*LTD* said:
Under U.S. Law, a company holding a monopoly who uses its position to "suppress competition" may be liable to penalties under the Sherman Anti-trust Act. In my mind there is no question that Apple is attempting to suppress competition here, and that it is using its economic position to do so. The end question then becomes, "Does Apple fit the definition of a monopoly?" In view of its market share, the answer has to be "no."* Still, they don't look very good here, do they?

*Is the answer the same if we look at revenues?

You forgot the part about Apple taking a stand (quite likely legal) against rip-off artists, counsellor. ASUS in this case is no "ordinary" competition. They are another legal target, and for now, Pegatron is enabling ASUS' activities. This is a prelude to a wider campaign by Apple against MBA knock-off artists. Same as Apple's moves against Samsung were the opening salvo of their wider campaign against Google (as we're seeing now with Apple's move against the Galaxy Nexus running stock Android.)

What, you assume Apple had no legal basis for doing this and just went into it blind??

LOL

No android phones means no competition and the return of the 600 iphone and stagnation of innovation. You really want this?
 
Apple is doing nothing wrong here. It is simply called conflict of interest.

Go into any major resturant and try to order a Pepsi product and a Coke product, you cannot. They have exclusive contracts with one or the other.

Any company that uses outside services has a right to decide if they want to continue using that service, if said service also works for the competion you can give the choice the the outside service. Apple gave them a choice, us or them, the contract manufacturer made their choice.

No gorrilla, no elephhant in the room and no foul.

You guys need to actually work for a business that makes or sells a product then you will understand how conflict of interest works.
 
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


Image


Digitimes reports on an article from Taiwanese newspaper Commerical Times claiming that Apple manufacturing partner Pegatron has ended its relationship with ASUS for production of the Zenbook under pressure from Apple. According to the report, Apple is displeased with the similarity in appearance between ASUS's Zenbook and the MacBook Air and forced Pegatron's hand with an ultimatum stating that Pegatron needed to choose one company or the other.Pegatron will reportedly wind down production of the Zenbook by next month as ASUS is forced to switch over to Compal or Wistron for manufacturing.

Image



Article Link: Apple Reportedly Pressures Pegatron into Ceasing ASUS Zenbook Production

It's striking me as odd that as Apple gets more users it is starting to become afraid of other companies making similar devices, Those loyal to Apple are not going to buy anything else and we know what copy cats look like, so why are they so worried, I for one am sick of Apple suing everyone, it's one of the reasons I decided not to buy a new iMac yet and just upgrade the old one, they need an attitude adjustment not more of our money.
 
Apple is doing nothing wrong here. It is simply called conflict of interest.

Go into any major resturant and try to order a Pepsi product and a Coke product, you cannot. They have exclusive contracts with one or the other.

Any company that uses outside services has a right to decide if they want to continue using that service, if said service also works for the competion you can give the choice the the outside service. Apple gave them a choice, us or them, the contract manufacturer made their choice.

No gorrilla, no elephhant in the room and no foul.

You guys need to actually work for a business that makes or sells a product then you will understand how conflict of interest works.


the most logical post in the this thread. thank you
 
lol, people tent to cover their eyes not to see the evidence.
It's clearly a ripoff made by people without any imagination.

I would think the Apple fanboys could relate quite well to that seeing most don't have an ounce of individual thought.
 
The article, as most from Digitimes, is probably as fake as a politician but can't help thinking that maybe Asus CEO should have answered that "call from Steve" after all :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqjoRMHyYQc (@ 00:00:35 for the impatient, but always worth watching for a good laugh)

Also why did Asus sell Pegatron only 1.5 years ago? Seems a very bad mistake, they could have kept some manufacturing control - again if there's actually any thruth in this.
 
At first I said Huh ? Then I went and looked at the Zenbook. It looks almost exactly like a Macbook Air.

Good for Apple.

Why can't these companies design their own laptops and tablets.

Lazy people. Just do what Apple does. That's the new PC mantra.

I agree with you 100%. If a Windows PC vendor want to compete with Apple, they need to stop coping Apple and start making actual PCs. This is why Apple is the #1 computer maker in the world. Imagination + Hard work + Very good costumer service = 15.43 million iPads and 5 million Macs in Q1 2012 :D
 
&

It's good to see Apple becoming the next anti-competitive behemoth in true Wintel fashion, right LTD? I guess absolute power really does corrupt absolutely.

So, when Apple was near extinct and clearly the underdog, how many times did they get sued or accused of copying Microsfot, HP or anyone else. They haven't changed. They've just succeeded.
 
This is downright unfair.

[/COLOR]
PC users with Mac envy a la copycat. Why not just buy a 17 pound Alienware? That's a unique design for Windoze users.

Says the Apple fan who jumped on the bandwagon Post-PPC era. Sorry buddy, you don't count as an Apple user.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I completely disagree with the notion this is anti-competitive.

I would have thought this was the very definition of competitive.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A406 Safari/7534.48.3)

Apple has a lot of guts.

Yep. And they're full of ****.

That fruit logo company gets more disgusting by the day.
 
Please re-read

You lost me already. Apple is NOT a monopoly. In fact, Apple is the UNDERDOG. So anything else you say is irrelevant.


Asus sold 7.09 million laptops, Apple sold 2.74 million (http://www.notebookcheck.net/Notebook-shipments-decline-across-the-board-for-Q1-2011.52400.0.html) - this is just a quick google, I'm sure there are other numbers in other quarters.

and you somehow think APPLE is a monopoly? Seriously????

Did you actually read what I wrote?
 
So, when Apple was near extinct and clearly the underdog, how many times did they get sued or accused of copying Microsfot, HP or anyone else. They haven't changed. They've just succeeded.
What lawsuits are you talking about?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.