Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple does not provide third-party cloud storage providers with the keys to decrypt user data stored on their servers, ensuring a strong level of security.

Google doesn't have access to the data. What's a shame?
It’s a shame that Apple *CAN* provide end-to-end encryption of iCloud data, they just choose not to. Courage much?

 
I like how people jump to the conclusions that google will take their private data. Google's ToS do like to use your data for free services, however once you pay, i.e. Google Workspace, everything is different. Google will have no access to any data that Apple are hosting.

Apple use third parties for data storage, you can even host it yourself if you want to be a part of Apple Edge Cache programme.
 
Maybe this is why they don’t increase free storage. It would cost us nothing but Apple would need to pay Google another $300 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xmach
I'm glad that I do anything in old style. Just safe my stuff at the Mac or in hard drives. iPhone has 512 gigs, no need for cloud. But if you do plz remember that google has a quantum computer. so encryption is no big deal for them. there is a very little possibility that it bounces back - but imagine, you'r facing innocent an trial and someone comes around with your data and you get nailed after that...
Murphys law - anything what can go wrong will go wrong. Law 2: never trust google.
 
Truly a shame.

And a disaster waiting to happen.

If anyone - NSA, CIA, China, Russia, NK, companies, private individuals at Google etc - are archiving these images if (or is it not a question of if, only when?) Apple's keys are ever compromised, everything that was stored there will be compromised.

Using off-device keys for any iCloud data is awful.

Apple having the keys is ensure there is NOT a high level of security since there are numerous ways they can be compromised, including subpoena and hacking.

This is a HUGE 3 million TB target. Just the fact that it is publicized makes it even more so - of course security through obscurity is never a good plan.
 
Last edited:
These articles are always a nice reminder that our data is stored on Google servers. Thanks MR as I always forget!
 
Spreading the storage across two different clouds, implemented using different technology, might just save a lot of bacon should something big and bad happen to one of them.

I have not the slightest idea whether some data is duplicated like that, but it would appear a pretty sensible approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolfactor
Reading > you.

Apple does not provide third-party cloud storage providers with the keys to decrypt user data stored on their servers, ensuring a strong level of security.

Apple does not INTENTIONALLY provide third-parties with the keys to decrypt user data...unless under court order or they are in China.

Or whenever Apple is hacked - I hope it never happens but nearly all the big companies have had it happen at one point or another.

Apple needs to just ignore the US Government and implement their plan to use on device keys to encrypt all data leaving the phone just as the phone is encrypted.
 
Apple does not INTENTIONALLY provide third-parties with the keys to decrypt user data...unless under court order or they are in China.

Or whenever Apple is hacked - I hope it never happens but nearly all the big companies have had it happen at one point or another.

Apple needs to just ignore the US Government and implement their plan to use on device keys to encrypt all data leaving the phone just as the phone is encrypted.
In western countries, it's been called "lawful access" ever since 9/11 (aka Patriot Act in the US) - but ALL countries around the world that care about espionage and terrorism have similar legislation.

EVERY service provider that has infrastructure has to provide access when given a subpoena by the government. Period. Don't like it? Don't do business in that country. Those are the rules.

Don't want the feds to get your data? Don't back your device up to the cloud.
 
So what is Apple supposed to do instead? Limit iCloud storage? Magically have data servers and centers appear? It takes time to build centers. If Google or other companies have them already, why not use those temporarily or instead?
How about build their own cloud storage system rather than be Google's byotch. Apple is one of the most profitable companies on the planet, they can afford to create their own cloud storage system if they really wanted to. I'm so sick of people defending Apple no matter how cheapskate they become. I'm sure they save a lot of money using other companies' cloud storage, but that also puts them at the mercy of the other companies.
 
How about build their own cloud storage system rather than be Google's byotch. Apple is one of the most profitable companies on the planet, they can afford to create their own cloud storage system if they really wanted to. I'm so sick of people defending Apple no matter how cheapskate they become. I'm sure they save a lot of money using other companies' cloud storage, but that also puts them at the mercy of the other companies.
I don't have links but I could have sworn there were articles here on Macrumors years ago about Apple using AWS/Azure/Google for some storage but they were going to be building more/using their own cloud services eventually. This was years ago and I'm too lazy to look but I was really hoping that would be the case.

I realize using other cloud is a lot cheaper than rolling your own but I thought this was already happening... years ago.
 
And yet iCloud continues to have service issues and sync like a bear compared to other services. So is that a Google problem or an Apple problem? I suspect the latter due to Cupertino's proprietary cloud stuff overlaid upon other proprietary cloud stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Premium1
Apple does not INTENTIONALLY provide third-parties with the keys to decrypt user data...unless under court order or they are in China.

Or whenever Apple is hacked - I hope it never happens but nearly all the big companies have had it happen at one point or another.

Apple needs to just ignore the US Government and implement their plan to use on device keys to encrypt all data leaving the phone just as the phone is encrypted.
"Apple needs to just ignore the US Government and implement their plan to use on device keys to encrypt all data leaving the phone just as the phone is encrypted."

Who do you think would win that battle?
 
  • Like
Reactions: planteater
How about build their own cloud storage system rather than be Google's byotch. Apple is one of the most profitable companies on the planet, they can afford to create their own cloud storage system if they really wanted to. I'm so sick of people defending Apple no matter how cheapskate they become. I'm sure they save a lot of money using other companies' cloud storage, but that also puts them at the mercy of the other companies.
Cheapstake? And your sick of of people defending Apple? That's a bit hyperbolic considering (probably) no one here knows what is going on at Apple with respect to cloud development. It's not like it's an easy one, two, three process.
- Design the system
- Build out the infrastructure
- Hire a cloud developer or two to implement it
- Finished....ready to go
 
  • Like
Reactions: One2Grift
And a disaster waiting to happen.

If anyone - NSA, CIA, China, Russia, NK, companies, private individuals at Google etc - are archiving these images if (or is it not a question of if, only when?) Apple's keys are ever compromised, everything that was stored there will be compromised.
What superior tech does Apple have that makes them immune to the bad actors you named? Google as a company is garbage, but I doubt their servers are more vulnerable than Apple's.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.