Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple also use AWS, apparently two years ago spending $30 million per month. They used to leverage Azure as well but picked up Google back in 2016.


They invest but there is a level of pragmatism of outsourcing bulk storage to third party vendors. It makes more sense to pay AWS and Google to store those chunks of data and have them be responsible for additional replication. Depending on how Apple has structured the pieces, having copies on two independent clouds allows for handling outages in a single vendor (including Apple themselves if they handled storage) and for the other clouds possibly locating data in regions closer to the user (e.g. Australian user data for iCloud stored primarily in Australia to provide a better experience for those users rather than round tripping to somewhere in the US). Setting up global data centre presences is complicated and expensive, why not outsource the easy block storage?
I’m sure some of these folks on this thread will also be shocked when they hear Amazon, Google and Microsoft also use third party data centers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pasamio and PC_tech
8 Exabytes for $300M a year. Which means Apple is paying Google $1 a month for 320GB of storage.
It seems to me you're not aware of a few things:

1. We as consumers pay a lot more per GB than companies do.
2. No taxes.
3. Prices per GB are lower than you think.


Just an example, I just searched the net for a cheap HD, It's as low as $15 for a 320 GB HD and that was a quick search.
 
You can’t or choose not to read do you. Google has no access to the encryption key so cry about privacy and I’m not sure what human rights has to do with this story but I guess if you’re a full time crybaby about Apple and Tim Cook this is the place for you.
omg full time crybaby.. thats cruel
 
But Apple Privacy bla bla, thats why I buy Apple, but Timo said.. human right, greed, smoke.

Privacy != secrecy.

Privacy can be made just by following policy.

In this case, it is even better. Just because you are a storage provider for someone doesn't mean you can read the data from your customers in any meaningful way.
 
This has to be like 1% of Apple's iCloud needs though, right? I personally have 1.5 terabytes on my iCloud account. There are surely about 8 million of Apple's 1 Billion customers using 1 terabyte of data.

I trust Apple to properly handle my data, not lose it and keep my data private and safe until they prove they can't do that.
Why are you using 1.5TB of cloud storage? May I ask what you have on it?
 
It also seems that Apple thinks Google to be a lesser threat than Amazon to have chosen Google Cloud over Amazon to store data.

It probably has to do with costs. Google is loosing money on their cloud infrastructure and are probably much cheaper than Amazon.
 
They're both big companies with a lot to lose. Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Google, Amazon.... they invest a lot into security just to keep up the front facing image.

With the WD MyBook Live hack ... I'd have a hard time putting my data in any cloud service that wasn't big company level cloud.
Speaking of the cloud, if people want to store personal information and files in the cloud, they should encrypt the information (using Cryptomator) before sending it to the cloud, so that no one has access to the files (whether it's Apple, Google, Dropbox or OneDrive etc.). That way, if the cloud were to ever be compromised, the personal information is not at risk.
 
Apple does not INTENTIONALLY provide third-parties with the keys to decrypt user data...unless under court order or they are in China.

Or whenever Apple is hacked - I hope it never happens but nearly all the big companies have had it happen at one point or another.

Which doesn't change if Apple hosts the data themselves.
 
How about build their own cloud storage system rather than be Google's byotch. Apple is one of the most profitable companies on the planet, they can afford to create their own cloud storage system if they really wanted to. I'm so sick of people defending Apple no matter how cheapskate they become. I'm sure they save a lot of money using other companies' cloud storage, but that also puts them at the mercy of the other companies.

It's not needed if a third party can do it better and/or cheaper.

Apple is famous for doing very little themselves and rely on third party for most of their operations and production.
 
Except for your email if you use icloud which is not stored encrypted. (It's transmitted and received encrypted but stored out in the open.)

And yet Apple can encrypt it with its own keys before sending them to Google and thus hiding the content from Google.

You are thinking about storing emails encrypted with keys only known to end-users.
 
Why are you using 1.5TB of cloud storage? May I ask what you have on it?
download


I am actually VERY conservative with my photo storage. Seriously. I will import, in the case of last week, 80 gigabytes of photos off my camera into Lightroom, I throw out 2900 of the 3100 images, I do all edits in there, then export them as 100% size JPEGs and import those into iCloud Photos or Photos for Mac. So I throw away about 90% of what I shoot and once every quarter, I export all 4K Video from photos for Mac and put them all on my Synology downstairs. So iCloud Photos is only iPhone + Real Camera photos since 1999 (when I got my first digital camera) and only the 'best' nothing in there is crap, or multiple pictures of the same scene. it's all my best photos and I have about 120,000 images in there.

My Synology's Video folder is about 8 terabytes with videos going back to the iPhone 3G days and my YouTube Folder which are exported final H.264 versions of the videos I upload to YouTube is about 20 terabytes. I don't keep original videos from my GoPro, Drone or other video cameras or else I'd be the one using 8 million terabytes of Google's Cloud.

My Flickr @ 30,000 images - https://www.flickr.com/photos/adamjackson/
and my Youtube @ 1350 videos https://www.youtube.com/user/adamjackson1984

this represents a sub-set of the content I've created over time....and I don't even make money doing it :p

So honestly iCloud Storage for me is my house burns down final JPEG version of my last 20 years + all of my personal documents. Work gives me 5 terabytes of OneDrive (well I have 3 jobs so I have 3 one drive folders) and those are all full of Microsoft documents so not really using that storage to its fullest. Then I have my 80 terabyte Synology NAS in the basement with about 60 TB on it and it's the first thing I grab in a fire even though I can replace most of it except my personal videos and then iCloud is like that final doc. Family above is just my GF's iCloud storage & photos.

So the only thing NOT backed up twice or off-site are videos shot on iPhone that were in iCloud Photos and exported to the Synology. If I kept every video I shot...well I can't afford to store it anywhere off-site.
 
Apple does not provide third-party cloud storage providers with the keys to decrypt user data stored on their servers, ensuring a strong level of security.

Google doesn't have access to the data. What's a shame?

does Apple itself have the keys to decrypt user data stored on Apple's own servers???(servers located on U.S. soil that are 100% built, owned and operated by only long-term full-time Apple employees)

just wondering....
 
Apple does not provide third-party cloud storage providers with the keys to decrypt user data stored on their servers, ensuring a strong level of security.

Google doesn't have access to the data. What's a shame?
Still, the data probably ends up in a very low cost subsidize Chinese data centre. For all to see. Encryption is not 100% proof you know. You can't say it's secure if you do not operate the data centre, that's my belief.
 
I wonder if third parties have access to iCloud email, as it's not encrypted at rest from what I remember.
It is encrypted when stored I believe, though one cannot be sure of transit encyption when sending mail. In addition, Apple holds the keys since its not end-to-end so they can read your emails, although they can’t really do it without a warrant.
 
Still, the data probably ends up in a very low cost subsidize Chinese data centre. For all to see. Encryption is not 100% proof you know. You can't say it's secure if you do not operate the data centre, that's my belief.
I don’t think it would end up in China and if the encryption is good enough it should take hundreds of years to break it so in the end, why would any mortal care to try?
 
So, around six exibytes of data?

or is it more impressive by saying “… million terabytes” to get around the binary vs decimal thing and gain a million or two?
 
So what is Apple supposed to do instead? Limit iCloud storage? Magically have data servers and centers appear? It takes time to build centers. If Google or other companies have them already, why not use those temporarily or instead?
The short answer is it should not sell iCloud storage that it as no capacity storing. I can already buy cloud storage from Google if I wants to. I trust Apple on security more than other companies. At the very least they should have provided a clear disclaimer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.