Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Investing in exciting new products in the pipeline"

Well, we're all waiting on this type of remark for a LONG time now.

We all see new interesting things coming from many other companies, and even new companies bringing innovative things to customers.

What's Apple doing?

It better not be yet another tweaked re-hash of the same old products.
It's really starting to get more and more noticeable as time goes on.

I'll take the rehash over what the other companies are offering...any day of the week. The products run like crap and the new features are half baked.
 
"Investing in exciting new products in the pipeline"

Well, we're all waiting on this type of remark for a LONG time now.

We all see new interesting things coming from many other companies, and even new companies bringing innovative things to customers.

What's Apple doing?

It better not be yet another tweaked re-hash of the same old products.
It's really starting to get more and more noticeable as time goes on.

By now everyone knows new stuff is coming in the fall. And everyone knows Apple doesn't disclose much, if anything, on what's in the pipeline. So as much as you think Cook's comment is getting old, so is yours. ;)
 
I know a lot of people like to rag on how much profit Apple makes but I think this is a good thing for us, it has been these record profits that allowed them to buy P. A. Semi and Intrinsity that helped Apple produce the A series chips for iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch and Apple TV.

It's this money that allowed them to buy the creators of Touch ID and Beats. We haven't yet seen the results of that Beats acquisition in Apple's products but I'm sure their influence will be felt in Apple products soon.

With record profits like this they could buy some really great talent, why license voice technology from Nuance when you could buy the whole company? (Of course Samsung beat them to that acquisition)
 
It will be interesting to see what Apple does with iPads this fall. A CNBC reporter talked to Cook today and Cook told them he was excited by what Apple has planned for iPad. Of course I wouldn't expect him to say any different, but with larger iPhones coming out that could eat into iPad share I think Apple will need to do more than bump the internals and add Touch ID. Maybe we'll see more on the software side specific to iPad.

You should have stopped at "I wouldn't except him to say any different." Time after time Cook has made similar types of statements about Apple's product line for upcoming years and quarters and it mostly turned out to be bumps. You can't read anything from anything Cook (or any other CEO) says unless he's being specific.

So don't get your expectations too high on that quote. At best maybe we'll see the so-called "iPad Pro" but I really think he just means the usual faster chip, adopt whatever feature was new in last year's iPhone.
 
As many have stated, its obvious the reason for the iPad decline is the long purchase cycle. iPhone is every 2 years AND a phone is a necessity product. iPad is probably closer to a 4 year cycle and is more of a luxury item. Makes ya wonder if iPad sales really have peaked or if Apple can do something to turn it around...

I still think the iPod name is valuable and transferable to other things, perhaps even to the wrist device Apple is coming out with.

I disagree. The iPod name has become stale, outdated, and "old". Maybe back in 2010 with the release of the iPad they could have salvaged the iPod name (as you indicate), but with iPod's consistent and heavy decline I think that utilizing the name for another product (such as the iWatch) would only be confusing and potentially damaging. If they did want to use the iPod name for the iWatch (iPod Wear?) then they would have kept the nano how it was and continue pushing the iPod line in that direction.
 
By now everyone knows new stuff is coming in the fall. And everyone knows Apple doesn't disclose much, if anything, on what's in the pipeline. So as much as you think Cook's comment is getting old, so is yours. ;)

I hope you are right.
Other than the Mac Pro which had a moments interest and then pretty much vanished of the radar it's just been tweaking products a little in recent years.
We've all been promised exciting stuff this year, so lets hope we see things to justify those words.
You can only keep grinning and saying it for so long before people will say well let's see all this new stuff then.
Let's hope in a just a few months time we are all standing with our mouths wide open and out jaws on the floor, speechless with all this amazing stuff.
With the Money, Talent and people they have we should expect nothing less.
 
I hope you are right.
Other than the Mac Pro which had a moments interest and then pretty much vanished of the radar it's just been tweaking products a little in recent years.
We've all been promised exciting stuff this year, so lets hope we see things to justify those words.
You can only keep grinning and saying it for so long before people will say well let's see all this new stuff then.
Let's hope in a just a few months time we are all standing with our mouths wide open and out jaws on the floor, speechless with all this amazing stuff.
With the Money, Talent and people they have we should expect nothing less.

It's pretty much guaranteed we won't see anything until September so why care what Cook says now. I'll care/worry if September comes around and what we get is nothing special.
 
I think the iPad actually cannibalizes iPod Touch sales. With the iPod Touch at $200-$300, and the iPad Mini 1st gen at $299 (and sometimes on sale for less), the touch has become a tough sell. And if someone wants an iPod for exercising, they generally get a shuffle, which leaves the nano in another kind of tough sell position as much more expensive than a shuffle.
 
I guess when you make net quarterly profit of $7.7 billion, forking out $3.2 billion for Beats is really just a drop in the bucket.
 
Guess this debunks Samsung's claim that the overall slowing market is the reason for their declining sales. Apple seems to be doing just fine.
 
I have an iPad 2 and I love it but besides not needing to upgrade any time soon, if I was going to get a second tablet for another family member there are plenty of options that do all the basics as well (and in some cases with better specs such as higher resolution screen) for a lot less money.

Until Apple comes up with a new must have feature for a tablet, it mostly comes down to pricing. $399 for a retina mini with 16 gigs of storage? Come on.

And speaking of storage, time to bump all the iPads and iPhones. $549 for 16 gigs on the 5c, $649 for 16 gigs on the 5s? And $450 for EIGHT gigs on the 4s is insanity. At those prices they all should have at least 32 gigs.
 
Last edited:
Makes ya wonder if iPad sales really have peaked or if Apple can do something to turn it around...

Bigger iPad, true multitasking, better keyboard (text selection is horrible, using copy & paste is a mess) - turn the iPad into a great productivity tool and sell it to business. The deal with IBM was probably a step in this direction, but Apple has to improve the iPad and the iOS before it happens,
 
If the iPad, or tablets are the future of computing... why have Mac sales increased and iPad sales dropped again?
 
It's pretty much guaranteed we won't see anything until September so why care what Cook says now. I'll care/worry if September comes around and what we get is nothing special.

I guess I care as I listen to what someone who runs a company says, and, perhaps foolishly feel that they are genuine with their public comments, and don't just not deliver.

I really do hope there is more to show.
My worry is that companies generally bring out great things and push hard when they are under pressure and really need to innovate.
My worry is Apple will get,or is just smug thinking all it needs to do it carry on with the yearly polish and that will do for another year.
It makes them money sure.
I hope we see a more dynamic Apple return as it was with innovation when it HAD to "innovate or die"
We've seen companies do this before and it generally ends in tears eventually.
 
I have an iPad 2 and I love it but besides not needing to upgrade any time soon, if I was going to get a second tablet for another family member there are plenty of options that do all the basics as well (and in some cases with better specs such as higher resolution screen) for a lot less money.

Until Apple comes up with a new must have feature for a tablet, it mostly comes down to pricing. $399 for a retina mini with 16 gigs of storage? Come on.

And speaking of storage, time to bump all the iPads and iPhones. $549 for 16 gigs on the 5c, $649 for 16 gigs on the 5s? And $450 for EIGHT gigs on the 4c is insanity. At those prices they all should have at least 32 gigs.

Did i miss out on the 4c last year? :eek::p
 
Bigger iPad, true multitasking, better keyboard (text selection is horrible, using copy & paste is a mess) - turn the iPad into a great productivity tool and sell it to business. The deal with IBM was probably a step in this direction, but Apple has to improve the iPad and the iOS before it happens,

Or stop trying to shove iPads down our throats, thinking it can replace laptops. Instead, introduce new retina bezel free Macbook Airs with all bells and whistels.
 
I agree that people don't upgrade their iPads often. I think most iPad sales are going to first time iPad owners. For one they don't add enough new features to the iPad to make it worth upgrading every year for most and like someone said above, people have to pay full price for the iPad. There are no subsidies or financing plans on most carriers. The iPhone usually has more new features added each year. I still have a 1st Gen Mini and probably won't buy the newest iPad Mini this year either because it won't be a big enough leap over that one.
 
Another record? This is getting boring.

----------

Guess this debunks Samsung's claim that the overall slowing market is the reason for their declining sales. Apple seems to be doing just fine.

Guess apple has figured out the one thing Samsung can't copy.
 
Cook said of the 3 iPhone tiers, the 5C had the best YOY growth. Clearly Apple had no clue what it was doing when it created that product. ;)
 
The iPad business continues to disappoint.

That's interesting.

Everyone who wants an iPad already has one and unlike phones, people don't replace their iPads every year/2 years. More like 3-5yrs.

Many of the iPads i see in households or offices are iPad 2s or 3s

The lengthy iOS support contributes to the behaviour as well. iPad 2 shipped with iOS 4.3 yet it'll get iOS 8.

Hardware is also quite durable as long as you don't violently molest it.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.