I think they said that Apple can continue with day to day operations for 70 years with the cash they have today.Plus all the extra cash they're sitting on. They'd be comfortable for a good few years.
I think they said that Apple can continue with day to day operations for 70 years with the cash they have today.Plus all the extra cash they're sitting on. They'd be comfortable for a good few years.
It's like when an Olympic athlete wins a gold medal, but doesn't beat their own best time
Let's see the guidance for the next quarter. THAT is what everyone is waiting for (beware there may be a SELLOFF). Also, how did Apple increase Revenue and Profits if iPad and Mac sales were down, and iPhone sales were flat? Is Apple Watch doing better than expected?
I think a lot of times people don't necessarily read the article. There are probably a lot of people who just see the headline and go "oh man Apple is having bad iPhone sales" skim on to the next headline.So the media writes shocking headlines to get people to read the article... thinking that their readers love bad news about Apple.
But the readers read the article and find that Apple had another monster record-breaking quarter.
At what point do the readers get fed up with this media nonsense?
Or there's an economic downturn.
I don't get the argument either. People should just buy what they can afford/need. It's like me complaining because I can't buy a Ferrari.So,,, please tell me why the Base Model on all iPhones should start at 32gb? Why would they do that? That would be Business Suicide. Cost them a quarter to higher the Storage from 16gb to 64gb,,, costs you 100 dollars. They increase base storage,,, NOBODY buys anything else... Don't like it,,, tell the 75 Million people to stop making the 16gb base model the NUMBER 1 purchase,,,,,, not even close and tell them to buy something else,, force the hand of Apple,,,, Until then,,, 16gb will always be base and if you want more,,, open your wallet
Well iPod sales are now in the other category, which also includes the Apple Watch, the Apple TV and all the accessories. Other sales accounted for 6 %.iPod sales are really non existent and appear to be minimal
...A $5 billion currency effect? Wow!
Yea it would be as poor as SamsungThey would make like 6 billion in profit without the iPhone, in 3 months. That's not "nothing"
Take iPhone out of the equation and apple isn't apple and only making 32% of what they're currently doing. I'm afraid to invest in apple since one product is 68% of their business.
Smallest improvement over previous quarters. A new high is great, but when it's such a small increase people wonder if the next quarter will be a drop. Numbers like that look like they're reaching a plateau.
The phone market may be becoming saturated... but not everyone has an Apple iPhone yet.Phone market is saturated along with iPads. Slow going in the future until new innovation and not bells and whistles.
iPhone revenue was up about half a billion dollars, services revenue was up about one and a quarter billion dollars, and Apple TV/Apple Watch/Beats/iPod/Etc revenue was up more than one and a half billion dollars. That's how revenue grew YoY.
Non-operating income was also up a couple hundred million dollars, and income tax provisions were down about as much. That's how net income grew YoY even though operating income was actually down a little (due to increased operating expenses).
I hope people remember this next time they bitch because Apple raises the prices in the UK, Canada, etc. because of currency fluctuations.
That's a lot of money to explain to your shareholders.
So the media writes shocking headlines to get people to read the article... thinking that their readers love bad news about Apple.
But the readers read the article and find that Apple had another monster record-breaking quarter.
At what point do the readers get fed up with this media nonsense?
If you remove iPhone, how does the revenue / profit compare to other big tech companies like Google or Microsoft?
It's unfair to call Apple a one trick pony. They're working on a variety of products and seem keen to innovate across the board - just because one of their products is so wildly successful to dwarf the others in a relative sense, doesn't mean the others are small on an absolute scale.
Well if you remove 68% of revenue from its earnings I guess you'll have your answer. When nearly TWO THIRDS of your entire companies earnings come FROM ONE PRODUCT it's a one trick pony. Why else do you think big investors are worried about Apples situation?
Well if you remove 68% of revenue from its earnings I guess you'll have your answer. When nearly TWO THIRDS of your entire companies earnings come FROM ONE PRODUCT it's a one trick pony. Why else do you think big investors are worried about Apples situation?
Because they're greedy? Without iPhone, Apple's revenue is equivalent to that of Google and Microsoft - and Apple have a higher profit margin. So, would that make analysts feel better? No iPhone (or a much less successful iPhone) so that profits are divided nice and evenly?
Put another way... if you just set aside the profits in this report, the company is really in bad shape!