Ya but the credit should be in full in the country... eg.., when you purchase a Mac, the return it with 14 days fr a "FULL' refund, you get that" regardless of country..
Not matching the cost sounds like a let down.
Apple collector usually interested with rare creature like this, I bet they priced higher ten years later.What happens if you DON't return it?
Lose your dev account which cost $99?
Other than for readers to side with developers and hate on Apple about this what is the point of making this public news? This is a contract between Apple and the Developers.
Other than for readers to side with developers and hate on Apple about this what is the point of making this public news? This is a contract between Apple and the Developers.
Ah yes, nothing should ever be reported on because of... “contracts”... 🙄
Without MacRumors originally reporting on this developers would be out $300.
Accountability is good, actually.
I have to wonder, why is Apple so desperate to get these back? Do they have plans for them other than recycling?
You'd think if some dev really wants to keep theirs as a memento, it should be allowed. Heck it saves Apple money since they don't have to give out that $500 credit.
It did not.Don't you think the terms of the DTK fully stated it had to be returned? Also now full reimbursement too.
When I as a (paying) developer had to shell out $500 for access to the device to perform basic M1 cross-platform testing, which by the way is contractually supposed to be covered in my paid developer agreement, yes, it's very anti-Apple's culture to make a move like that.They just don't want them in circulation. Apple owes no one an explanation and just because they want the machines back doesn't mean they are "desperate" for them. Strange choice of words.
Also you're way too optimistic and giving developers too much credit thinking they'll just keep them as a "memento". LMAO. Many of them would get sold and end up in circulation. Is it really so hard to understand this?
ahm the layout of a DTK and M1 mac mini are very different.pls make some research before making such accusationsWow. I'm glad I returned that sucker 2 or 3 weeks after first receiving it, for cash, not for Apple Store 'credit'.
Developers paid $500 bucks to break their backs re-building apps for the new M1 and after all that they can't even keep the machine they paid for?!?! WTF Apple. How lame.. These Mac Minis were likely recycled hardware to begin with and I can't imagine that they cost Apple more than $50 a pop to produce. What in the world are they going to do with this 'buyback' of the developer units? Is it possible that there's something 'wrong' with the developer M1's that they want to bring back in-house to prevent outside security firms from discovering?? That was my first thought when hearing this. It is odd to me that they're going through a buy-back program to re-acquire crap Mac Minis that were likely refurbished with the M1s added.
And what's this BS about $500 credit? Why would anyone want $500 credit over $500 US Dollars back for the hardware they originally thought they were buying?
I don't recall if they honestly charged sales tax in addition to the $500 for the unitTwo words - sales tax. Why should Apple refund a portion of the cost they're not entitled to reclaim themselves, having long since handed it over to the relevant tax man?
INTERNAL LAYOUT IS DIFFERENTahm the layout of a DTK and M1 mac mini are very different.pls make some research before making such accusations
Even if all devs kept it, production was still very very limited. This is the very first “mass-produced” arm Mac ever. I wonder how many they made.. a few hundred? It’s literally a limited-edition Mac. Imagine how valuable these machines will be in 20-30 years.It's only going to be rare if most people don't return it. So, ironically, by keeping it because you think it's value will increase, you're essentially helping to ensure that it won't.
apple always asked back for their DTK same in 2006 and it was stated on the Page in Developer Section of Apples Website that they have to be returnedIt did not.
Show me where in the M1 developer access agreement it says thatapple always asked back for their DTK same in 2006 and it was stated on the Page in Developer Section of Apples Website that they have to be returned
there is not "M1 Developer Access Agreement" its called the "Universal App Quick Start Program". and it states down on the website about the DTKShow me where in the M1 developer access agreement it says that
Someone didn’t bother to read the terms. It’s literally in the first section of restrictions.It did not.
it is no where covered in the Apple Developer Programm agreement that you have access to the DTK. its only that you have the Possibility to apply to get a DTK. however you have access to all the software tools to program apps even without being part of the Paid Dev Programm. for paying u get access to the Validation and pushing your apps to the Appstore. also a Paid dev Membership gives u access to directly get support from a Software Engineer at AppleWhen I as a (paying) developer had to shell out $500 for access to the device to perform basic M1 cross-platform testing, which by the way is contractually supposed to be covered in my paid developer agreement, yes, it's very anti-Apple's culture to make a move like that.
Read Harder.It did not.
#jinx - your answer was more complete than minethere is not "M1 Developer Access Agreement" its called the "Universal App Quick Start Program". and it states down on the website about the DTK
https://developer.apple.com/programs/universal/
"As part of the program, you’ll have limited access to a Developer Transition Kit (DTK), which will be shipped to you, for developing and testing your Universal apps. The DTK is owned by Apple and must be returned."
and on The Terms & Condition Page its Written under point 4.
https://developer.apple.com/terms/u...veloper-Universal-App-Quick-Start-Program.pdf
4. Term and Termination; Return of the Developer Transition Kit
The Universal App Quick Start Program will commence on the date You accept this Addendum and will automatically expire and terminate without notice from Apple one (1) year from the date You accept the Addendum, unless terminated earlier in accordance with this Section 4 or otherwise agreed by Apple (the “Term”). This Addendum and all rights and licenses granted by Apple hereunder will terminate (including any right to use the Developer Transition Kit), effective immediately if You or any of Your Authorized Developers fail to comply with any term of this Addendum and/or the Developer Agreement, or in the event that Apple suspends or terminates Your Developer account. Either party may terminate this Addendum for its convenience, for any reason or no reason, effective immediately upon written notice from the other party of the intent to terminate.
You agree to promptly return the Developer Transition Kit to the Apple address designated by Apple no later than thirty (30) days after the end of the Term, or as otherwise earlier requested by Apple (including via email or announcement by Apple on developer.apple.com). At the end of the Term, You agree to immediately cease all use of the Developer Transition Kit and the Universal App Quick Start Program. Failure to return the Developer Transition Kit may result in the suspension of Your Developer account or termination of Your Developer Agreement.
Wow. I'm glad I returned that sucker 2 or 3 weeks after first receiving it, for cash, not for Apple Store 'credit'.
Developers paid $500 bucks to break their backs re-building apps for the new M1 and after all that they can't even keep the machine they paid for?!?! WTF Apple. How lame.. These Mac Minis were likely recycled hardware to begin with and I can't imagine that they cost Apple more than $50 a pop to produce. What in the world are they going to do with this 'buyback' of the developer units? Is it possible that there's something 'wrong' with the developer M1's that they want to bring back in-house to prevent outside security firms from discovering?? That was my first thought when hearing this. It is odd to me that they're going through a buy-back program to re-acquire crap Mac Minis that were likely refurbished with the M1s added.
And what's this BS about $500 credit? Why would anyone want $500 credit over $500 US Dollars back for the hardware they originally thought they were buying?
I don't recall if they honestly charged sales tax in addition to the $500 for the unit