Edgecrusherr
macrumors 6502
"Delay" because I don't honestly think they would rather push major features weeks or months after major OS release, so they ultimately have to announce that these features will come later. It's not a delay in the sense of the public announcement, but I'm pretty certain that it's a delay internally, and generally not ideal for development teams that are straining themselves to meet these ridiculous yearly update cycles. The real problem is that they rush these yearly OS updates out, and can't include all the features day one. The even larger problem, particularly for me, is that these OS releases have bugs in them that never get resolved, and the answer is typically "it'll be resolved when you upgrade to the next version" which has new bugs that will never get resolved until they release after that, and so on.Not a single feature is delayed. They have internal rollout schedules and they meet their targets. A delay would be if they announced a date for a feature and they didn’t meet it, and that isn’t what is happening here.
I'm sitting here on a brand new Mac studio, that I upgraded from a 2010 Mac Pro, because I was tired of dealing with lots of system bugs and stability, only to find myself dealing with lots of bugs and stability issues. Where is my old G5 running very stable and mature 10.4 and 10.5 systems, and my 2006 iMac running a very mature 10.6, are much more stable and liable overall.
Apple's hardware is currently in a really great place (for the most part), but their software side of things has been very lacking for years, and the only correlation I see is the feverish pace for yearly major upgrades—likely forced upon them for marketing purposes, not because it's what's best for their users.