The interactive stuff, movies, and the meetings stuff are its killer apps. Apple seems to have gotten those "right." Of course, for $3500 I will never know.
Your field of vision is clearly obscured already. Apple clearly and specifically stated in the keynote that the device does not obscure field of vision.Please show me the mainstream demand for interacting with the world through a screen that obscures your entire field of vision.
Do you really think that people are clambering to live life under a helmet like Mandalorians?
I will put it more on the level of the Apple TV. Those of us who want it have been tinkering with all of the cheap junk thrown at us for years and Apple has finally stepped in to change it all.For the second time, Apple has released something new which I have absolutely no interest in. The first was the HomePod. I expect a similar level of success for this product.
They also were really careful to limit its use in public places.Your field of vision is clearly obscured already. Apple clearly and specifically stated in the keynote that the device does not obscure field of vision.
to be honest I am not sure it is worse than a phone. people already have stopped interacting IRL, but more interacting digitally.That's exactly where I am: there is absolutely no doubting the technical brilliance of this and the tech enthusiast in me is very, very excited. However, on the flip side I can see a future where people completely stop interacting IRL and do everything virtually. If you think people are over immersed in their phones now then, as the saying goes, "you ain't seen nothing yet"
And to anyone saying VR, this is AR and considering the power inside the machine, 3500 is not that crazy. Obviously it is crazy, you are better off spending this money on a holiday, but considering this is an Apple product... it's not that crazy, they sell $2K phones...
Just ordered a second Mac Studio Ultra, pretty good deal considering the power consumption.
You mean the One-eyed "pirate" version? Sure thing.Will be excited when the “SE” model comes out for half price.
But you only get 2 hours of battery life without plugging it in the whole time.Passengers are going to be able to rent these on long flights at a premium, so there's a big chunk of orders for Apple.
If AirPods Max are $550, how is a device that is capable of sound, vision, computing, 3D image capturing, M2 performance, etc not worth 3 grand?That's my thinking. This is like the iPhone if it were released in 2001. The tech is there at the extreme bleeding edge, but it just costs too much right now. In five years it'll be much more affordable and everyone will be wearing slim Nano or Air variants in different colors.
I don't think that's a real Kidney tho.