Literally every argument here is poor.
1. We're not talking about old trickle down products. We're talking about a yet to be release brand new product. No M2 Pro is going to debut in a $1499 box.
2. Who is it going to sell to? Anyone who might buy it would also buy a Studio or a MBP. Apple isn't going to lose money on those purchases just because.
Who is the $329, $449 and $599 iPads for?
Who is the $1299 MacBook Pro for that the $1199 MacBook Air or the $1999 MacBook Pro isn’t?
You’re literally saying that apple wouldn’t add a step to the ladder of their devices… When they’ve spent the last five years literally adding as many steps to their product lineups as possible.
There’s an iPhone at pretty much every price point, an iPad at pretty much every price point, a laptop at pretty much every price point, but for the desktops, there are some massive gaps.
There’s also gonna be a laptop with the M2, M2pro and M2max… but not the same options for their desktop line? No.
There’s literally an Intel Mac Mini in the lineup right now just asking to be replaced.
Also:
“Anyone who might buy it would also buy a Studio or a MBP. Apple isn't going to lose money on those purchases just because.”
You are describing up selling, and it’s literally what Tim Cook is best at.
Making a massive latter of products.
“Why spend $699 on an M2 Mac Mini, when you can spend $1299 and get an M2 iMac.
Oh you don’t want an all in one? Well then why not spend $1500 on the M2pro Mac Mini?
Oh, it’s almost perfect, but you really need extra ports? Well check out the Mac Studio.”
It’s literally his game, and a midrange desktop isn’t a bad idea to keep their shipments going up and up and up.