Because the 27” iMac and the iMac Pro are dead.Wait, how does Young know this display isn't just the 27 inch iMac? Wasn't that why they predicted the 27" iMac was coming this last spring-- Because they conflated it with the studio display?
That's my guess as well. I can see this going for $3,000 - $3,500 and nicely filling the gap between then Studio Display and Pro XDR. Although no doubt they'll have to update the Pro XDR soon since the new Studio Display Pro would pretty much destroy it in everything other than size.Well this is likely going to cost 3000-3500 so it doesn't seem to be an issue when the SD is 1799 and the Pro XDR is 4999. Perfectly in the middle really.
You would have never survived the 90s.27 is way too small to get work done, try having 2 windows side to side with a descent sized font, it should be 30 at the very least. 32 would be best. That said, you can get a Cinema display 30 for less money and better quality.
Not sure why you should need 16-inch MacBook Pro to "get work done tbh.? Your job might just need an 11.6” Chromebook to “get work done" tbh. like data entry job? Why are you getting an MBP 16? Such a waste tbh.I get a lot of my work (actually all of it) done on my 16 inch MacBook Pro screen. Not sure why one should need a 30 inch display to “get work done” tbh.
Locktite makes a silicone tape that can be wrapped around the ends of those cables and will harden into a rubbery coating that holds things together. I’ve done that on 3 Thunderbolt displays.Except for the jacket crumbling on the signal cable, I’m still happy with my TB display.
This is one of the strangest comments I've read in a while.Not sure why you should need 16-inch MacBook Pro to "get work done tbh.? Your job might just need an 11.6” Chromebook to “get work done" tbh. like data entry job? Why are you getting an MBP 16? Such a waste tbh.
You don't need a large screen if you are not a professional that needs one. If you only have enough money to get your 16-inch MacBook Pro and have no money left for a large screen, that's understandable. It's funny that some people can't afford more than an MBP and, being sour grapes expect all jobs to be done well and efficiently with a tiny screen.
You said “only issue” to two separate issues… 😂Two 27" Thunderbolt Displays does it for me. There is no better monitor for dollar. Even new I think they were $999 and today they can be found for less than $400 very easily. Only issue they have is the cable failing, but they are fairly easy to replace, however it is completely unnecessary because you connect a Thunderbolt to Thunderbolt cable to the Thunderbolt port on the back of the Display. The only issue I have with it is the ethernet ports on both have stopped working.
you're not the target audience for that display.Huh, interesting. Guess I have my bad eyesight to thank for saving me $4k then!
Have, absolutely nothing compared to XDR. Would prefer to not have anything if that was my only optionYou obviously never used it
Well, I would rather have nothing than the Studio Display. Imagine having to update your display's software...I guess I'm stupid. *shrugs*
I love my Studio Display and I don't see the need to compare to a screen that is around THREE TIMES the price of it. What a terrible argument.
Work is of different types. There are applications with too many panels and some kinds of work typically require multiple such apps. So not for everyone, but yes, some do require a larger screen with more pixels so a lot fits within the same view. For them, the productivity is so much better.I get a lot of my work (actually all of it) done on my 16 inch MacBook Pro screen. Not sure why one should need a 30 inch display to “get work done” tbh.
That’ll be EizoThat why god invented LG, Samsung, Ben-Q, Asus, ViewSonic, etc.
Simply buy a display that meets your needs from them. Easy.
Other people require a better display with better image quality. Apple fills that need.
That’s because you’re supposed to buy 2 and Apple knows that.27 is way too small to get work done, try having 2 windows side to side with a descent sized font, it should be 30 at the very least. 32 would be best. That said, you can get a Cinema display 30 for less money and better quality.
Countless better options?Just watch it be 16:9 again…
It was test of the customers, to see how willing people would be to buy a years-outdated product that they then further gimped by slapping a logo on it. Judging by the below responses, it worked.
No, speaking as a creative professional who has worked in a lot of studios, it is not a good choice for that at all.
It is a subpar monitor with countless better options. Apple has made excellent displays; the current MacBooks and iPads Pro are a great example, as are the Cinema Displays of the past. This is a parody of that.
I get lots of work done on a 16.2 --inch MacBook Pro M1 Pro. It ain't about display size for real productivity.