And why would Apple make their keyboard vertical? That ruins the purpose of it being an external keyboard if the orientation isn't even what we're comfortable with... Not excited for the new iPads this year.
Virtually every device you would use with that iMac uses the USB port and provides its own headphone jack. Typically 1/4" jacks.
Yeah, but bluetooth headphones have been around since before his death. He had a few opportunities to get rid of it. I think it's possible he didn't because Apple thinks of themselves as a music-centric company, and Bluetooth audio was always inferior in quality to wired. Apple's implementation of BT was often behind and lacking features too.
These were out in 2007, the same year as the very first iPhone, so they could have even introduced the first iPhone without a headphone jack if they wanted
https://www.cnet.com/products/motorola-s9/review/
Soon...
Can't use expensive 3.5mm studio headsets on iPads, Macs and Macbooks without a dongle.
Can't use Lightning Earpods from iPhone on iPads, Macs, and Macbooks without triple dongles or if at all.
If I’m gonna upgrade from my 9.7 Pro to one of these, I’m gonna have to live with the downgrade from TouchID to FaceID. No matter how hard Apple tries to convince me, TouchID is way more convenient than FaceID, ESPECIALLY on a large device like the iPad Pro.
And why would Apple make their keyboard vertical? That ruins the purpose of it being an external keyboard if the orientation isn't even what we're comfortable with... Not excited for the new iPads this year.
Oh no I can’t keep my tangled headphone that practically strangle me at times.
No one is removing jacks from professional audio equipment. At least not anytime soon.
Doesn't mean we need it on phones or tablets.
Removing choice is not good.
No people just want Apple to not remove features they use.
Granted, but they want people to start using their Airpods... This is probably why their not including the dingle in the box and removing it from iPad in addition.
Just as long they don't do this to the Mac as well, i'll be happy. And they could, because you only need Bluetooth for Airpods
The future is changing....perhaps for the worse.
I haven’t used faceid have you, be honest.
Face ID is amazing. Very, very, very far from junk for anyone who's looking at tech objectively.
No people just want Apple to not remove features they use.
So I'm not allowed to be an Apple customer who is dissatisfied with Apple's direction, but would like to be able to continue to use their products?
I take it that there actually are no benefits to AirPods beyond not having wires, as you refuse to provide any.
Lots of people use wired headphones and many of them have tried wireless headphones. This may blow your mind, but some people might even use a combination of both wireless and wired headphones depending on where they feel each technology is more suitable for them.
Removing choice is not good.
No you don’tWell, yeah. It's on my phone.
Except for the fact that you have to be at the perfect angle/distance every time for it to work. Same facial expression. It's junk. Limitations that were never a problem with touchid.
But what if I’m not using it in the keyboard dock position and it’s lying flat on the table? With my finger I can just tap the home button (I have to use my finger to use the device anyway), with FaceID I have to pick up my iPad or weirdly position my head over the camera so it can unlock. Not easier than TouchID. Sorry, but I’m not one of those people who just loves everything that Apple throws at them, no matter the impracticalityPretty sure lightning earpods plug right into iPads. And Macbooks ARE Macs. So really, you're just saying "Mac doesn't have a lightning port". Thanks, genius.
[doublepost=1532797298][/doublepost]
You're really not thinking this through, are you? If you use an iPad Pro with a keyboard dock, you're telling me that touching the button on the screen is easier than looking at it?
[doublepost=1532797356][/doublepost]
You do realize this is a rumor right?
VGA doesn't carry audio; only video.Maybe we will finally get that lightning to vga adaptor with built in audio jack?
If someone was daft enough to pay me to use headphones I would use whatever they gave me, even if it was a set of AirPods.You couldn’t pay me enough to plug in a pair of wired headphones back into my iPad or iPhone.
I have a very nice noise-reducing over-ear Bluetooth headset thank you.
Its great for some things but useless for others thanks to the lag.
Then, I often plug my iPad into my HiFi while its simultaneously on charge... so I'm going to need a bluetooth adapter for that (....another box, cable and wall-wart power supply) or pay even more for a dock with a 3.5mm adapter and charging.
Simples:
Cash only please, no cheques.
- Fire up GarageBand with a piano keyboard
- Hit a note
- Notice the half-second lag before you hear the note, making wireless headphones useless for this. Actually, GarageBand even pops up a warning to this effect if you start it while using bluetooth audio.
But yet it is so essential to Apple’s DNA. Talk about choice? This is the very same company that emboldened the two by two product matrix. Phil already went in to great detail at the keynote talking about “why” they’re removing the jack. Really, why is this is such a surprise to people? This is just rinse and repeat for Apple.
Apple has been “removing choice” going back decades.
It’s called Bluetooth. They have been making Bluetooth headphones for 15+ years.
That's a nice blanket statement. There are still use cases for wired headphones.You don't need anything other than a Bluetooth headset in 2018.