Don't care, I love mine having come from a long line of Pro Max models.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Except an earlier article indicated iPhone Air stock sold out in China…It was a nice try but they really need to just cut that line. Mini, plus, now this. All sales bombs? Just do regular and pro max. That’s all that is needed.
It's cute that you think the Air isn't also a "brick phone". It's the same type of phone. Just because its slightly thinner and slightly lighter, doesn't make it any less of a brick.I understand why people would choose another phone, but it doesn’t make sense to me why so many people seem to actively hate that the Air exists? Are you afraid Apple is going to take away your brick phones?
Powerful & thin is what foldables allow, and can’t for Apple’s foldable to come outanother flop like mini.
people want power, not slim devices.
thin devices are too fragile.
You're the first person in this thread to call it a bomb.
Americans are hooked on BIG. It’s their divine right or something.
You define an overpriced product as a bad product. That is an arguable position, but I prefer to be more specific and describe the Air as a good product priced so high as to reduce demand. And of course we do not know what sales are, other than that sales appear to be less than planned for.I guess it depends upon your definition of good or bad product?
I think "how it sells" and/or "does it sell enough" is a component of a product being good or bad or "good enough".
I don't know how we could argue otherwise.
A product has to sell successfully enough, otherwise it's at least somewhat of a bad product in that the right choices weren't made to make the product successful enough in the market.
Still rocking a 15 Pro Max here, but this is interesting - Of all the 2026 iPhones, the Air is the only one I'm interested in.
I suppose what's stopping me is the camera system. If they could get the Pro cameras into the Air, then I'd be all over that.
I think as well, the base memory on the Air is 12GB like the Pro, up from 8GB used by base 17. I don't know if that's because of extra computing needed for the slightly thicker camera system in play with a singular lense, but that extra RAM could either offer some more performance option, or on the negative, provide a bit more of a battery drain.For $200 more than the base 17, the Air gets you only 6.4% more screen area, saves only 12 grams, and does add the "pro" cpu (noticeable?). But weaker battery (major negative), no 0.5" camera, lesser speaker. IMO, should only be maybe $50 more than the base 17.
But it's so thin.
iPhone Air would have sold better at $699 instead of $999. Yet Apple overplayed their hand like usual!You define an overpriced product as a bad product. That is an arguable position, but I prefer to be more specific and describe the Air as a good product priced so high as to reduce demand. And of course we do not know what sales are, other than that sales appear to be less than planned for.
Sure, and we also don’t know how many units were sold outside of China …2 things can be true. It isn't clickbait just because you don't like the content of it.
We don't know how many units were on sale in China.
That would sell well unless apple did something silly and sell it without a camera and have the camera as an add on.iPhone 18 mini air?