The Expectations are very high for Apple.. but of course .. 3000 dollar laptop!
It is partly Intel's fault that the CPU runs as hot as it does. This is Intel... now Tic Toc Toc Toc Toc Toc... or Tic Toc Boom... While other fabs are moving to 7nm fabrication (probably somewhere around 9nm in Intel speak)... Intel picked the wrong path and they are not in a good position. They have not moved to 10nm (they were supposed to be there 2+ years ago) - which they have not been honest about... and it is likely they are not even close to doing a proper processor in 10nm... If the chip was at 10nm right now (2 years late) it would generate a lot less heat. So yes, it is partly Intel's fault for giving customers faulty roadmaps and not being honest. The Apple laptop is good, but it could be better.But everyone said it was Intel's fault!!!!
How about making the laptop thicker and with a better cooling system?
If it was Intel's fault how is it that Apple fixed it?It is partly Intel's fault that the CPU runs as hot as it does. This is Intel... now Tic Toc Toc Toc Toc Toc... or Tic Toc Boom... While other fabs are moving to 7nm fabrication (probably somewhere around 9nm in Intel speak)... Intel picked the wrong path and they are not in a good position. They have not moved to 10nm (they were supposed to be there 2+ years ago) - which they have not been honest about... and it is likely they are not even close to doing a proper processor in 10nm... If the chip was at 10nm right now (2 years late) it would generate a lot less heat. So yes, it is partly Intel's fault for giving customers faulty roadmaps and not being honest. The Apple laptop is good, but it could be better.
Do you even look at the numbers? Cook and Apple are dominating. Absolutely dominating.
What he suggested is better.How about no, and instead make laptops that are better?
Yeah, I saw bottlenecks on my 32-core/64-thread X7560 server, I think much worse than what you describe. I forget if it was the SSDs or the HDD I was reading/writing on. Could even be a RAM bottleneck if Handbrake is going through it since the separate CPUs (4 of them) don't share any caches. Oh well, I guess the MBP won't have to worry about that anytime soon
Edit: It was even slower than the 6-core i7-4xxx (I forget which number) I tried it on, even though the Xeon machine is overall faster in other benchmarks and real-world tasks like Apache Spark. So Handbrake is not perfect for this.
If it was Intel's fault how is it that Apple fixed it?
How many Apple die hard fans blasted the original coverage??
Go to the original macrumors post, and we had people defending Apple calling the YouTuber a whiner, just wanting attention.
They called it throddlegate to mock the issue. Also, one guy was telling everyone to use their head, to move along as this isn’t a story.
Best of all some people were critizing the original video poster for not making a video about surface.
People need to be accountable for their words!!! Apple diehards who refuse to believe that Apple can’t do anything wrong need to wake up. They are really making it worse for the informed consumer.
There are plenty of people who give that appearance. This was a legitimate concern raised by a number of people and there were a number of people who were blaming everyone but Apple for it (or denying it was an issue to begin with). It's shocking how so many people are so blindly loyal to a company which cares nothing about them.
What people will remember is what goes on between "Stuff happens" and "Apple fixes it".
In this case:
Is every problem report going to be met with defensiveness, denial, and "gaslighting" from Apple defenders? But all that is perfectly ok as long as "Apple fixes it"? After looking back on previously reported issues which were corroborated, one would think that maybe the community should be less defensive and less dismissive when new issues are reported.
Somehow Apple fanboys are proud of the fact Apple is making so much money (as if, as an end user, it benefits them and doesn't negatively affect them).Nothing says "Absolutely dominating." like 19% of the mobile market share and 13% of the desktop market share.
They're absolutely dominating at making money I guess...?
They didn’t fix anything, they made it little bit better. It will still throttle just like any decent laptop with i5/7/9 the only question is how much not if.If it was Intel's fault how is it that Apple fixed it?
The issue with the heat is not fixed. The throttling below base is more or less fixed. The laptop though will perform better than any current, but no matter what - the processor could perform better if not for the amount of heat generated. That is on Intel... They are failing on what use to be their strength. (not to mention all the OS patches that have decreased performance because there are so many bugs that cannot be fixed currently).If it was Intel's fault how is it that Apple fixed it?
The difference is Apple didn't replace the processor with a new one. They merely changed the cooling system the "engine" is attached to.Because they have the ability to control many aspects of the system performance also. Your BMW breaks down due to a bad water pump. A local garage can fix it just as the dealer can. Wow, imagine that.
Somehow Apple fanboys are proud of the fact Apple is making so much money (as if, as an end user, it benefits them and doesn't negatively affect them).
I do not feel that Macs are better than some Windows machines. In some respects they're better and others they're worse. Depends on the criteria used to classify something as better or not.
While there were many theories as to what was causing the throttling, Apple has discovered that there was a missing digital key in the firmware that impacted the thermal management system, driving down clock speeds under heavy thermal loads. This is what has been addressed in today's update.
No! Intel offers a processor with a certain set of specifications. If a computer manufacturer uses it in a system for which it is not appropriate that is 100% on the manufacturer. Period, there is no further discussion on this point. Stop apologizing for Apple.The issue with the heat is not fixed. The throttling below base is more or less fixed. The laptop though will perform better than any current, but no matter what - the processor could perform better if not for the amount of heat generated. That is on Intel... They are failing on what use to be their strength. (not to mention all the OS patches that have decreased performance because there are so many bugs that cannot be fixed currently).
You are using a nebulous qualification. What is meant by better?I agree, I have both.
Still more people buy the ones that are not better. In other words if you break it down further the majority are not buying the ones you refer to. Comparing the best windows boxes to mac is fine, but these are not what the majority are buying so my comment stands.
Oh, well at least we all remained calm and no one freaked out.
You are probably right. It will morph into a bi*! fest about something else.nah, it’ll keep going.
just the complaints will change.![]()
Note my use of the words "end user" and not shareholders.Hey if shareholders and executives making money makes people happy, all the power to them. I guess I have other priorities in life.![]()
And you would be certain to perpetuate that.
You mean like bitching about bitching?You are probably right. It will morph into a bi*! fest about something else.![]()
I'd like to know how hot it becomes under load when it's in geosynchronous orbit around Mars.