I asked why you used the pic, not where you got it lol. “Why”, as in, “for what reason?”
In the video you linked, Phil talks about a MBP with two 5K monitors and two 24TB RAID arrays attached to the four Thunderbolt 3 ports and says “So, when you think about that storage, those displays... this level of expandability and performance is not possible on any other notebook.”
But that’s true, so it couldn’t possibly have been what you meant when you posted the Schiller pic and said “Perhaps marketing departments should be more careful about what they say.”
And again, the pic was in response to the original poster who seemed to disagree with how a laptop should be used. Specifically:
Who uses their laptops like desktop workstations like this? Laptops are meant for portability and not sustained workloads the like of which you are describing. If you are doing sustained workloads like this, definitely invest the money on a desktop. They are more reliable and won't crash like you mentioned.
As for your statement "Wasn’t sure why your reply included a picture of Schiller.", it's because the video showing the MacBook Pro hooked up to all that equipment and used like a desktop included Schiller in the frame. Why Schiller was included in the frame? Ask Apple.
Going back to the original poster's comment, people were expecting to use a laptop in that manner because Apple said that you could, as seen in their October 2016 Special Event video. So if people have a problem with that type of usage, they should take it up with Apple's marketing department.
And it was the same situation when Apple was putting 6 bit screens in 2007 MacBook Pros calling it so great and "color quality simply not available on any other laptop". When Apple was criticized for making such grandiose marketing claims with inferior lcd panels, Apple defenders sidetracked the issue by saying "why would anyone do color critical work on a laptop screen"? Again, because Apple said that you could.
Bad things happen when companies let their marketing departments run wild. Other examples:
VMware's product line: vThis, vThat, vYourMom, etc.
Citrix's product line: XenThis, XenThat, XenMyAss, etc.
Cisco, Microsoft and other companies putting the word "One" in their product names. Let this "One" fad die already.
Microsoft's dozens of different licenses for the same software. Example: Office 365.