That was image retention,not burn in.
Which becomes burn in after a short time. It also did not go away after many tries when it showed it. If it was image retention, it would have gone away by running some solid colors on the screen for hours, but it did not.
And last I checked, it is still called BURN-IN from many experts like CNET.
https://www.cnet.com/news/oled-vs-poled-screen-phones-burn-in/
Please educate yourself from the article above.
"
What exactly is burn-in?
Problems of a lingering afterimage have been around since the first days of plasma TV. Traditionally "burn-in" means that the afterimage (a ghostly "impression" of the image that was on the screen previously) never goes away; it's permanently burned into the screen. Image retention, on the other hand, implies something temporary, where the afterimage disappears eventually.
Whatever you call it, burn-in is generally caused by leaving a static section of screen on for a long time. Examples on TVs include logos and tickers at the bottom of news channels like CNN, a score bug from a baseball game, or the status display from a video game. You see more static images on phones, particularly the notification and navigation bars.
Watch this: What is Pixel Burn?
1:20
In most cases, those static sections of screens don't linger as faint afterimages. But on the Pixel 2 XL, the faint lines of the notification bar and hotkey buttons still stuck around after the display was turned off overnight and after running a screen burn-in fix video. These factors suggest that this issue is more persistent than standard image retention, which usually disappears after some time."
Last edited: