Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Perhaps this is a new nightmare before Christmas.

I too don't get this ad. I never would have associated Frankenstein's monster with the holidays. Why is he singing "Home for the Holidays" when he just left his home? Why not "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" or "White Christmas"? I'm all for the idea of inclusiveness, but this is one of the strangest ads I've ever seen.
 
Perhaps this is a new nightmare before Christmas.

I too don't get this ad. I never would have associated Frankenstein's monster with the holidays. Why is he singing "Home for the Holidays" when he just left his home? Why not "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" or "White Christmas"? I'm all for the idea of inclusiveness, but this is one of the strangest ads I've ever seen.

I'm not sure how singing one of those two songs you suggest would have made this any less strange.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: JoEw
I've just re watched it and it's quite clever. Frankenstein Monster was a functioning being made from the amalagamation of various bits and pieces of other people. It worked but was very cumbersome.

A bit like the new MacBook Pro. Which requires many many addtional dongles just to be useful and even then it doesn't have many advantages of its functional cousins.

Nice comparison Apple.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pikup Andropov
When are people going to realize Frankenstein is the scientist, not the monster. o_O
Sure but remember the scientist was named Victor. Frankenstein is his last name so while we don't have a first name for the monster it is still frankestein since he was the adam of the creator victor. In short I will call him Adam frankestein. Kinda like Apple creating the iPhone. It's still an apple product. Apple=Frankestein and iPhone=monster.
 
Sure but remember the scientist was named Victor. Frankenstein is his last name so while we don't have a first name for the monster it is still frankestein since he was the adam of the creator victor. In short I will call him Adam frankestein. Kinda like Apple creating the iPhone. It's still an apple product. Apple=Frankestein and iPhone=monster.

That's silly. His name is Brad. Brad Frankenstein.
 
When are people going to realize Frankenstein is the scientist, not the monster. o_O

In Mary Shelley's novel, Victor Frankenstein's 'monster' was obliquely referred to as Adam. Shelley later referred to him as Adam.

But whether you consider his first name to be Adam or not, the begotten of Victor Frankenstein could certainly still be a Frankenstein, no?

Whether Adam Frankenstein or some other (or no other) given name, calling the 'monster' Frankenstein would be hard to refute using any sort of objective argument.

YOU may disagree that he was an offspring of Victor Frankenstein. But it would be impossible using the source material to argue objectively that that is the only interpretation. Quite the opposite actually.

So, if you can consider the 'monster' to be a sort of offspring of Victor Frankenstein, then calling him by the 'family' name Frankenstein is perfectly apt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aarond12
I've just re watched it and it's quite clever. Frankenstein Monster was a functioning being made from the amalagamation of various bits and pieces of other people. It worked but was very cumbersome.

Only in the Hollywood version. The creature is very different in Mary Shelley's novel: Highly intelligent, deeply emotional, lost, abandoned and very tragic. Shelley's work should be required reading not only for all scientists, but for everybody.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.