Then you have fallen right into Apple's trap..
![]()
I thought so different I bought a Surface Pro 3, 4 and Book..
Then you have fallen right into Apple's trap..
![]()
A petty gripe I have as well is removing the light up Apple logo and startup chime. It doesn't affect my work in any way shape or form, but they're just a pleasant addition that is unnecessary to remove.
I think what you're looking for is an iPad Pro. I know "But it runs iOS", please tell me a "pro" thing you would do while using your detachable screen, that truly benefits from it and there isn't an app for that.A touch screen on OSX in it's current form, meh.
Touch Bar, meh meh meh.
A fictional MBP with a detachable screen & pen support, a touch screen would be great.
Unfortunately, Apple is sticking to old paradigms until at least 2019.
That Schiller moment of "innovate my ass" is looking increasingly embarrassing now, doubly so given the state of the Mac Pro.
Sad times.
Why not s touchbar AND a touchscreen? That would be even more useful.
Remember "light pens" in the 80s? Same problem: you're hand gets tired. Touch is fine on tablet, but for a screen in front of your face you need to rest your hands on something. Personally, I think this will culminate in a few years with a fully touchscreen keyboard/bottom display. Think a pair os iPads sandwiched together to form a single giant tablet or a screen & keyboard.
Then you've never used a Wacom. I do this every day on my iMac.
This is a good interview to watch, at around 2 minutes 50 he talks about the idea of a touchscreen Mac.
That is true, and once again i was stating an opinion NOT a FACT. I find it funny that people complain about Apple and all this supposed lack of innovation and that they are copying and falling behind, but when someone else points out that another company (such as Microsoft) seem to have copied a design from them, it's suddenly got to be all fact based. This is only ever an opinion, which again i thought was clear when i posted. Maybe i should edit the post to relay that.
As I've said elsewhere, I would love to have that versatility as well, but not if it compromises something else like weight or battery life. I just don't have much use, if any, for a touchscreen on a notebook or desktop. Also, it is ergonomic purgatory. It slows work down besides. For these reasons, I don't have a keyboard for my iPad. Touching the screen to get anything done lifts your hand from its workspace. This is why I wish Apple would add a trackpad/mouse capability to the iPad. THEN it would be a potentially viable replacement for my desktop.
Who needs a touch bar when you have "a big, beautiful trackpad"?I absolutely agree with Jony Ive that a touchscreen laptop or desktop is not a great or particularly useful idea when you have a big, beautiful trackpad like you do on MacBooks and MacBook Pros. This is simply a question of ergonomics. Do I want to be using a touchscreen with my arm extended in front of me? Not really. Touch input is much more comfortable and useful when the positioning of the input device is more-or-less parallel with the floor.
Honestly I am very impressed by Ive's sentiment with respect to finding a balance between the mechanical and the adaptable and think it is a highly reasonable approach.
It amazes me how excited he seems about the touch bar. During the original presentation, I wondered if the presenters actually were excited about the touch bar or just needed to fill the time. To me, the toucher, while useful in some regards, is way to gimmicky and they were way too excited about it.
In this video, he also commented about how the new MacBook Pro had everything people wanted in an Air, yet was thinner. There's one thing the Air had that better: the price. When the 13" Air starts at $999, and the base Pro (without Touchbar & only 2 TB ports, I might add) is 1.5x the price. With the touchbar and 4 TB ports is $800 more.
I'll defer to your experience in this matter. I just don't think I would like to blindly feel my way across a trackpad with a pen to draw a picture. Perhaps I would feel different if I gave it a try. Perhaps it is an easily learned skill like guiding a mouse cursor?
Touching a laptop screen is overrated. I would lose my mind about having to constantly clean it if I did. It's why I haven't used my old iPad since the iPhone 6 came out with a big enough screen. The only thing I struggle with is the cost of the new MBPs with the Touch Bar and wondering how it will be incorporated to do really functional work. The early things seem kind of like a gimmick, and my MBP spends a lot of time glued to an external display anyway with a keyboard and mouse.
Agreed, its too early, but some of the concerns I have may not be resolved with more apps being supported, but to be fair, giving it some time is a sound move.I think we need to give the touchbar a little time. It also seems to me that it is a gimmick and excuse not to copy the competition with a touch screen.
i'm not sold on looking down at the keyboard to perform special tasks.
I keep my eyes at the display level, so any interaction that does not involve a physical button would take more time than before. I can invoke "cmd+" "cmd+alt+" shortcuts faster than how i would tap on a strip on top of the screen.
then, most people who don't know keyboard shortcuts would appreciate the change.
macOS has tons of configurable keyboard shortcuts, you just need to learn and get used to them.
How are you so lucky to have the new MacBook Pro already?Instead Apple wants us to move our eyes from the screen and touch a tiny strip, and move our eyes back to the screen. How's that intuitive? It's a total gimmick.
If Apple decides to remove a perfectly fine keyboard and replace it with the horrible butterfly thingie - which types like **** - why not take the extra step and remove it altogether? There's almost no tactile feedback anyway.
And, the keyboard made sense on MacBook, being ultra portable and ultra light, but for a Pro laptop? Really?