Try touching a picture and holding on to it. You should get an option to save it...
Well don't I feel silly
Try touching a picture and holding on to it. You should get an option to save it...
Can we finally get cut and paste in OS X? Not going to happen.
Stereo bluetooth? Please?
Try the two-finger-on-trackpad click (enable it first in the Keyboard & Mouse preferences).How about a 2nd button on laptops?
Um, you do know Copy/Paste is already in OSX don't you? You can use it almost everywhere including for files in the Finder.
1.15 was free to Touch users. I expect 2.1 to be free to 2.0 users.
i hope 2.1 (aka 2.0.1???) will get the bluetooth stack that allows us iphone 2G owners to pair with our external bluetooth GPS!!!
apple, let me decide if i want to drain my battery and when i need my GPS! i hope apple listens and gives us the right to get GPS running with the "old" iphone 2G....
c'mon apple, this would be so easy for you guys!!!
since the 2.0 update was a bummer in that regard i hope apple really gives a damn....
I'm fully paid up (ADC Select member, iPhone Dev Program) and I don't see anything on the main iPhone page except the usual links for SDK 9m2199a (final) and things like the Program Portal. It doesn't appear to be listed on connect.apple.com for me either; most recent thing to download there is a QT seed.
I just want my smooth UI, and stability back.
Edit: Actually no, I want smooth UI, stability, fast browsing speed, removal of SMS typing lag, push email to work properly, Safari to quit crashing, better battery life, and copy/paste.
OK, thats it.
I got it off http://developer.apple.com/iphone. I been a paid member since May, so maybe they haven't turn it on for all paid developers yet?
I really wonder what will be the best way to implement copy/paste? There was that one video that came out a while back, but frankly I don't think that was a very good implementation.
I guess (a) the ability to highlight text, and still be able to bring up the loupe, somehow, (b) the ability to copy that text, maybe with a gesture or two finger click, and (c) the ability to paste text where ever.
Apple will never offer GPS on the iPod Touch. Too many features on the iPod Touch and then the iPhone isn't special anymore.
One problem is that Apple mistakenly (IMO) decided to co-opt some standard (mouse) gestures normally used for selecting content and use them for navigation, instead, on the iPhone:
Click and Drag mouse = Select enclosed content
vs
Tap and Drag = Scroll or Flick Page
Double-Click/Triple Click = select word/entire field
vs
Double-Tap = Zoom page in/out
This decision limits what they can do (now) to select content for cut/copy & paste.
I suppose, they could implement some modal solution, e.g. press-hold to get into text selection mode... but that i would make the situation worse.
I'd rather see them re-implement the iPhone so:
1) navigation/zoom gestures require 2 fingers
2) content selection gestures use 1 finger (like the existing mouse standard)
Apple made the right call. The touch gestures they have are very intuitive and well thought out.
- Navigation (panning) is more commonly used than content selection. Hence it should use 1 finger. 2 finger gestures work, but they're not as comfortable on such a small screen. And certainly not as precise.
- The idea of flicking with a finger to pan around a canvas is a very natural one. It feels like the internet is on some kind of slab on a bed of water, and you're looking at it through a window. It's a very easy to pick up gesture.
- Going on from above, the touch gesture system is an entirely different concept to the mouse. Since you're actually touching the objects on screen, it has to be made to feel organic and human. The idea that this new, human-centric input system should have to be shoe-horned in to a product by emulating a system devised decades ago is absurd. And the mouse wasn't designed for the mobile system. Wonder why nobody's made a trackpad on a mobile phone? Not because they can't, but because it sucks.
Multi-touch is an entirely new input philosophy, based around feeling natural to the actual people who use it. It should feel natural compared to things we do in the real world, not just things we normally associate with a computer. MT is also heavily optimised for the mobile platform - a lot of the decisions that have been made with mobile computing in mind.
Mostly speculation on my part, but backed by some historical data:
Look for Apple to charge 3G owners for the 2.1 upgrade.
becuase of Sarbanes-Oxley, Apple has had to charge for upgrades that introduce new functionality, except for the original iPhone, where you were "under contract" with them.
Well, the 3G is now just like the Touch - you buy it from Apple, and you're getting the funcitonality delivered. Period. They can't introduce new stuff without running afoul of SOx (thank you Enron).
Of course, "bug fix only" releases are fine to release as free.... so do look for a 2.0.1 and beyond.
Again - just speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised at all...
Perhaps the fact that they are no longer getting monthly payments from carriers means iPhone 3G users will have to pay for upgrades. This would also give them reason to issue updates less frequently.
God damn SabOx!
Look for Apple to charge 3G owners for the 2.1 upgrade.
becuase of Sarbanes-Oxley, Apple has had to charge for upgrades that introduce new functionality, except for the original iPhone, where you were "under contract" with them.
Well, the 3G is now just like the Touch - you buy it from Apple, and you're getting the funcitonality delivered. Period. They can't introduce new stuff without running afoul of SOx (thank you Enron).
There's a law that doesn't allow free added features to devices where the accounting policy accounts the entire thing at one time as opposed to say Apple TV and the iPhone which accounts over the span of two years. Now bug fixes and stuff are free, since obviously they're bugs.
Uhhh, no, and no. The carrier revenue share has nothing to do with free updates. They are accounting for iPhone revenue under a "subscription model" (breaking the revenue of the device over 24 months), which allows them to give updates for free. The iPod Touch is NOT on a subscription model, and its revenue is recognized at sale, thus under SarbOx regulations, it's not easy for them to introduce new features at no cost.