Don't think so. Apple released a seed note too. So would you also say apple jumped the gun too?
wear on your keyboard? are you seriously worried about this??I dock my iPhone next to my iMac, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who does that. Being able to use Touch ID instead of a password would save me time and wear on my keyboard.
Guys, I can't even update to macOS Sierra public beta 4.
The App Store shows that an update is available, but clicking on the update button does absolutely nothing...
I dock my iPhone next to my iMac, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who does that. Being able to use Touch ID instead of a password would save me time and wear on my keyboard.
Having to take an iPhone out of your pocket is not as intuitive as unlocking with the Watch, but it's still an improvement on the current password-based method that would reach many more users.
For Apple it's a feature not worth developing, because they see the potential to sell more Watches. For the average user, there isn't any reason it shouldn't be possible.
They may have removed the seed in preparation for PB5. If DB 6 is actually ready for release today. Or has this been an on going issue?
It's been an ongoing issue since the first time the update was available. I'm using terminal to find an update and beta 4 is the only one that shows, also.
Weird, you could try changing the DNS settings either to Google DNS or back to your ISP's to see if that forces it to look at a different CDN server, I'm not sure other that that off the top of my head. Might be worth waiting a while though in case an update is released today. Sorry I can't help more than that.
It's something I'd like to avoid if possible. That doesn't mean I waste my time being worried about it.wear on your keyboard? are you seriously worried about this??
A lot of people carry around their iPhone and laptop Mac at the same time, or dock the iPhone near the Mac if it's a desktop. The feature should be useful in either situation.I don't think the average user would benefit a great deal, I think it would benefit a minority of users.
This was being discussed when the 5s first came out and is relevant to anything unlocked with Touch ID. I'm surprised you haven't had all this time to think about it.How would this improve "the current password-based method", other than making it faster for some users? There is still a need for a password on the mac, so bad passwords as a vector for a hack is still as much a problem as at any other time.
Is Siri available only on a limited set of recent hardware (ala iOS) or would be available on all machines that macOS Sierra can run on?
Siri is not limited to any specific Macs. It will run on any Mac running Sierra, even unsupported ones.Is Siri available only on a limited set of recent hardware (ala iOS) or would be available on all machines that macOS Sierra can run on?
If I re download the file from the App Store, it should download the latest file right, NOT public beta 1?
This isn't currently a feature and I don't expect it will be. The watch is always unlocked as long as it remains on the user's wrist, unlike the iPhone which is locked as soon as the display sleeps. To auto-unlock with the iPhone then, the user would still have to locate the iPhone (which may or may not be a big deal, depending on where the phone is at any given moment), authenticate with TouchID, and then they would have access to their Mac. For many people this isn't likely to save them a great deal of time over simply typing in their password. My phone is generally in my pants. I can type my computer user password faster than I can retrieve my phone from my pocket and touchID it.
Many people keep their phones in a purse or bag. That's an even bigger imposition than a pocket! Really the only people who would save time with auto-unlock via iPhone would be those people who happen to have the phone in their hands as they sit down to their computer. This is probably a lot of people at any given moment, but probably NOT a majority.
Sure this is a part of it. The watch is a much better tool to unlock your Mac with than the iPhone, so the resources required to create the feature are better off directed towards the watch. Auto-unlocking with iPhone just wouldn't be a great experience under most circumstances, at least not relative to the Watch. It does, of course, make the watch just that much more compelling as a side-effect. Isn't it funny how that works?
How would this improve "the current password-based method", other than making it faster for some users? There is still a need for a password on the mac, so bad passwords as a vector for a hack is still as much a problem as at any other time.
I don't think the average user would benefit a great deal, I think it would benefit a minority of users. It's completely technically possible to bring this to iPhone, and you're right, Apple isn't motivated to being a so-so experience to iPhone users because not doing so makes the Watch more compelling. If you want to avoid typing your password, get an Apple Watch because it offers the best possible experience for doing so. Frustrating? Maybe, but the rationale is fairly straightforward to me.
I think it is necessary to consider the situation at a more macro level. What is the number of people who have their phones handy (docking, or literally in hand) as they sit at their Mac, and at what frequency?
My guess is that the number of people who have their phone handy as they sit at their Mac is rather small, and the percentage of those people who do so regularly even smaller. Just because YOU frequently (though surely not always) have your phone handy when you sit at your Mac doesn't mean this is how it is for many people most of the time.
Conversely, how many Apple Watch users have their apple watch on and unlocked when they sit at their mac, and at what frequency? My guess would be this number would approach nearly 100% of Apple Watch users nearly 100% of the time.
Of course, if we looked at absolute numbers, there are far more iPhone users than Watch users (which are, by definition, a sub-set of iPhone users), so whatever the percentage of iPhone users is that has their phone handy at their mac the majority of the time may well outnumber the near-100% of Apple Watch users, but it seems fairly clear that the iPhone would offer a poorer experience even in those cases compared to the watch, and if it happens to make the watch a more compelling product at the same time, then why spend resources on creating a so-so experience for a minority of iPhone users?
That does sound tedious, but is necessary due to Apple's restrictions on 3rd-party apps. An official Apple method would be to take out the iPhone and unlock it once, thereby also unlocking the nearby Mac, I'm sure.You can use an app called MacID if you want to unlock using your iPhone's Touch ID, but it's really not that handy. Typing a password takes a second, while taking out your phone, unlocking it, pulling down notification center, hitting the unlock button, waiting for the Touch ID popup and then using your finger to unlock it takes at least 10.
I think MR saw the dev portal update and wrote the article, and someone at apple forgot to hit the SUBMIT buttonDon't think so. Apple released a seed note too. So would you also say apple jumped the gun too?