Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People love to whine. How hard is it to make backups for ****s sake? Apple has to engineer a port specifically so that your ass can be covered when you’re too lazy to make and maintain a backup when options like time machine exist and are so easy?

Yes.

And they don't need to design/engineer one. They could have kept using the one they had.
 
Backup is now more important than ever. Now that there are 4TB MBPs a lot of tears will be shed by people that lose years worth of work at once. Anyone buying a system with one of these massive drives better have a multi layer backup strategy in place.
 



In 2016, when Apple introduced the first MacBook Pro with Touch Bar models, the repair experts at iFixit discovered the notebooks have non-removable SSDs, soldered to the logic board, prompting concerns that data recovery would not be possible if the logic board failed. Fortunately, that wasn't the case.

migration-assistant-800x385.jpg

Apple has a special tool for 2016 and 2017 models of the MacBook Pro with Touch Bar that allows Genius Bars and Apple Authorized Service Providers to recover user data when the logic board fails, but the SSD is still intact.

The tool is essentially a little black box that is able to transfer data from a failed logic board to a functioning MacBook Pro. The box has a flex cable that connects to a data recovery port on the failed logic board, while the box and a functioning MacBook Pro are connected via USB-C to USB-C cable.

apple-customer-data-migration-tool-800x314.jpg

Apple's internal Customer Data Migration Tool

Once the logic board is placed into a special holder, and all cables are connected, technicians simply power on the functioning MacBook Pro, open Migration Assistant, and proceed with the standard steps for data transfer.

apple-customer-data-migration-tool-connector-800x763.jpg

Customer Data Migration Tool connector on 2016 MacBook Pro logic board

An internal ATLAS training video for the Customer Data Migration Tool was recently leaked on YouTube:


While not fail-proof, the tool is a convenient, last-ditch option for data recovery when a MacBook Pro's logic board goes kaput. But, unfortunately, it appears the tool will not work with the latest models.

Last week, iFixit completed a teardown of the 2018 MacBook Pro, discovering that Apple has removed the data recovery connector from the logic board on both 13-inch and 15-inch models with the Touch Bar, suggesting that the Customer Data Migration Tool can no longer be connected.

MacRumors contacted multiple reliable sources at Apple Authorized Service Providers to learn more, and based on the information we obtained, it does appear that the tool is incompatible with 2018 MacBook Pro with Touch Bar models.

Multiple sources claim that data cannot be recovered if the logic board has failed on a 2018 MacBook Pro. If the notebook is still functioning, data can be transferred to another Mac by booting the system in Target Disk Mode, and using Migration Assistant, which is the standard process that relies on Thunderbolt 3 ports.

The data recovery port was likely removed because 2018 MacBook Pro models feature Apple's custom T2 chip, which provides hardware encryption for the SSD storage, like the iMac Pro, our sources said.

Apple's internal 2018 MacBook Pro Service Readiness Guide, obtained by MacRumors, advises technicians to encourage customers to back up to Time Machine frequently, and we highly recommend following this advice, as it now appears to be the only way to preserve your data in the rare event your MacBook Pro fails.

MacRumors also confirmed that Apple's internal document for its Customer Data Migration Tool has not been updated to reflect use with the 2018 MacBook Pro, and nothing else we've seen outlines any alternative solutions.

While it appears Apple itself is unable to recover data from failed 2018 MacBook Pros, the Service Readiness Guide does state that customers can consult with data recovery specialist companies, such as DriveSavers, Knoll, Seagate, and Payam, but it's unclear how they might be able to help.

We've reached out to Apple for clarification. If we receive any information, we'll update this article accordingly.

Article Link: Apple Seemingly Unable to Recover Data From 2018 MacBook Pro With Touch Bar When Logic Board Fails
[doublepost=1532385882][/doublepost]Just receive my 2017 MacBook Pro back from service. It took 10 days for them to repair the keyboard issue. While at it, they also replaced the logic board. No data was saved. Then they installed a version of Mac OS Sierra, while the letter said that they did install a fresh copy of the latest operating system.

Apple service is below zero. The machines are not well made. Bad combination. But at least, they look fancy. Probably the only thing the dudes at Apple care for these days.
 
A machine is either secure, or insecure. It doesn't become secure or insecure depending on who is using it. So it's better to be secure. In the old days where there was no encryption at all, people still lost data.

I'm not defending for Apple but to be realistic, it's just like walking on thin ice by depending on the internal SSD on a laptop. Just back it up and forget about it.

Just put the option for hardware disk encryption in System Preferences -> Security -> File Vault where it already exists and a warning when you turn it on that the disk will be unrecoverable in the event of a logic board failure. That's really all it takes. A simple courtesy to to the user to decide for themselves what they want and how much they care. That said it should be off by default. And while they are at it give the user the option of backing up the encryption key to their iCloud account.
 
Is it means ur data in 2016 and 2017 model can be stolen by anyone has this tool? So Apple removed it to protect privacy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Not too long ago, someone gave me a dead MacBook Pro 8,1(13" early 2011).

The LoBo is dead, which is actually quite a rare failure mode for this module. In "exchange" for the dead computer, I pulled their HDD, put it in an external enclosure, and handed it to the owner. He has all of his stuff back-music, documents, pics of his daughter-and I have a good body I can build an MBP 9,2 out of. Those days, of course, are long gone.

Folks are saying that there are backup solutions, and that's true. When I was finishing up my master's degree, in addition to hourly time machine back-ups when I had my external HDD connected, I saved everything to Drop Box and even burned daily CDs that I stuck in my safety deposit box. Yes, the last one is overkill, but you can't be too safe-they laughed at the bank when I went into my box after graduation, pulled out a cake platter full of CDs, and dropped it in the trash :) .

Still, accidents happen. I have a good friend who is in "crunch time" now and defending her dissertation in a week. She keeps a flash drive plugged in to it and saves her work both on the computer and on the flash drive pretty much every time she writes or changes a paragraph(or inserts a figure or whatever). Last week, she THOUGHT that her MBA had died, and unfortunately it was on a day when she hadn't brought her flash drive with her. Fortunately, it was fine but I got her signed up for Dropbox that day so now she has a local copy, flash drive copy, and cloud copy. Losing even ~8 hours of work would have been devastating.

The fact that there's no possibility of recovery really disturbs me. Let's face it-a laptop is NOT a phone, and there are times when it's "off the grid." I have a bus powered drive I use for Time Machine, but just like carrying a bag full of dongles having to cart it all the time kind of defeats the purposes of a "smaller and lighter" laptop...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jynto and NetMage
That’s not a fair retort.

On any other machine, if the main board dies, you can recover the data (typically by simply removing the drive).

On these machines, If the main board dies, you cannot.

In the past, the point of backups was to protect against a damaged DRIVE, not against a damaged main board.

The odds of you losing data go up, because it used to only happen if the storage died. Now it happens if the storage or any other critical part of the main board dies.

Add to this that Apple is making it harder to backup by eliminating time capsules, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Totally understand what you’re saying and where youre coming from. My post was merely sarcastic hence the /s at the end of my stupid post.
 
The fact that there's no possibility of recovery really disturbs me. Let's face it-a laptop is NOT a phone, and there are times when it's "off the grid."

There are plenty of times when phones are off the grid too.

So, you are really concerned about using you laptop off the grid when you might lose data due to a component failure on the logic board, but not worried about loss of data due to flash chip failure or flash controller failure or OS data corruption failure? Only component failure is so likely and important as to need constant backup for protection?

Remember, having the data port is worthless for the average user because the hardware encrypted data can’t be used even if copied, but having a copy of the data can be very useful for the determined attacker who finds it worthwhile to spend lots of time and hardware on cracking the encryption which is only possible if they can copy the data off.
[doublepost=1532405073][/doublepost]
How is the recovery port a backdoor? You need to disassemble the computer to get to it. And when you do, your data is still protected because the port doesn't decrypt it.

By your logic, the ability to take apart a computer and remove the hard drive is a "back door."

It certainly is, and we’ve had hard drives removed from desktop PCs at night and stolen away. Fortunately we use full disk encryption and they’re likely just after some quick cash and not data, but it would certainly be preferable in a portable device if there was more security.
 
Is it means ur data in 2016 and 2017 model can be stolen by anyone has this tool? So Apple removed it to protect privacy?

Does this mean that a replaceable SSD using full disk encryption like FileVault would provide better data protection if the drive were stolen? So the 2016/2017 soldered SSD was actually a step backwards?
 
That's what happens when you solder everything. Everyone involved with the idea of the soldered donglebook, including those who bought it, deserve this. NO SYMPATHY when there's been so much backlash against the recent MacBooks.

You made your bed, now sleep in it :)

Soldering doesn't matter in this case, because the drives are encrypted with the T2 chip's Secure Enclave. I suspect there is just a different recovery process/hardware because of that, although I'll be surprised if its not identical to whatever process exists in the iMac Pro.
[doublepost=1532409891][/doublepost]
Does this mean that a replaceable SSD using full disk encryption like FileVault would provide better data protection if the drive were stolen? So the 2016/2017 soldered SSD was actually a step backwards?

If it's FileVault, it's FileVault. This hardware tool and target disk mode both expose an encrypted volume.
 
Except that Apple has also end-of-lifed time capsule, so things are going to be quite interesting going forward...

You do not need a Time Capsule to backup wirelessly with Time Machine. Many third-party routers support it and most consumer NASes do too.
[doublepost=1532411371][/doublepost]
Something tells me you agreed with Steve Jobs when he said 'You're holding it wrong.'

He never said it and he never wrote it.

Of course, it is no surprise that you are spreading wrong info around.
[doublepost=1532412718][/doublepost]
Stop apologizing for Apple

Stop apologising for users.

It has never been the manufacturer of the machine's responsibility to provide recovery of data. It is your responsibility and has always been so.

Do you believe Apple as a legal requirement do to this?
[doublepost=1532413083][/doublepost]
Funny how many people here are pointing towards the customer not taking back-ups as being the problem. The problem here is that, in case your logic board fails, there is no way to recover data which isn't backed up (yet).

Backup and restore have always been the user's responsibility.

Yes, you can loose data, but have you considered that in many cases you can just create it?

Lets say it is two hours since your last backup. You have been working in a spreadsheet and then your logic board fails. What do you do?

1) Send it in to Apple, wait several days for them to recover and get the data to you. And maybe even have to pay them.

2) Restore from the last backup on a spare machine or a new machine, and just recreate the work.
 
If you're not familiar with cryptography, removing this port might be seen as an arbitrary decision. It's not. This is the first Mac to have robust disk encryption, on par with iOS devices. As a result of this design, data is now useless when moved to any other computer. If you extracted the data with the service port, the data you'd get would be garbage. Not even your password could decrypt it. A port is no longer useful.

The longer version:

Until now, Macs just used your login password to encrypt the hard drive. That's not robust encryption, for 2 reasons: (1) almost nobody uses a login password that is sufficient for encryption (128 bits of entropy), and (2) after the data gets extracted from your hard drive, a cluster of computers can try to decrypt the data in parallel.

On iOS devices and this 2018 MBP, the encryption is robust. Every device has a hardware module ("secure enclave") with a secret key, the UID, that is ~impossible to read. Instead of just encrypting your hard drive with your login password, it uses a combination of your login password and the device's secret UID. (Your hard drive's encryption key is "entangled with" the device's UID.) The only way to decrypt the data is to have both the hardware module and the login password. That's what (1) provides more than 128 bits of entropy and (2) prevents the data from being decrypted by multiple computers in parallel (since there's only one hardware module).

This is 2018; all portable devices should be encrypted with robust security by default. If anything, customers should be upset at Apple for taking so long to modernize the Mac's disk encryption. So, yeah, you need a fully functional device to decrypt its data, and no, you can't siphon the data out using a secret service port.
Good post. However, backup now becomes a weak link of the entire information safety, because not many customer portable storage devices support said robust encryption. Even if they have, cross-platform compatibility is a headache to deal with. Attackers, instead of extracting data from internal SSD, will focus on attacking backup media. I would love to see options to keep backup media secure and easily accessible.
 
People love to whine. How hard is it to make backups for ****s sake? Apple has to engineer a port specifically so that your ass can be covered when you’re too lazy to make and maintain a backup when options like time machine exist and are so easy?
Not everybody can make a backup every second they use their computer.
 
Not if you're out and about and away from your Time Machine.

Time machine works once an hour when you bother to plug the thing in. So by this poster's logic, you'd better have your MBP docked to your desk most of the time so it makes backups at least once a day. Don't forget that both disks are in the same location and running while you do this, and an electrical fault or a fire could kill them both.
 
People love to whine. How hard is it to make backups for ****s sake? Apple has to engineer a port specifically so that your ass can be covered when you’re too lazy to make and maintain a backup when options like time machine exist and are so easy?
I sincerely hope that losing 1/2 a day of precious data will offer you some broader perspective in this.
In your perspective, car manufacturers might as well stop offering brakes, as pedestrians are not supposed to be on motorways anyway.
Apple'd better axe the overambitious guy who wanted to save a few bucks on CPU sockets for a $4000+ Pro-device (and the other idiot that decided to save a few millions on TimeCapsule for a multibillion company...)
 
Last edited:
People love to whine. How hard is it to make backups for ****s sake? Apple has to engineer a port specifically so that your ass can be covered when you’re too lazy to make and maintain a backup when options like time machine exist and are so easy?

And other people love to make excuses for Apple's incompetent and unnecessarily fragile engineering. There are a million different reasons why someone might create something incredibly valuable on a laptop in a few hours, and then have the computer die before they have a chance to make a complete backup of the data. Making full backups takes time, even with fast drives. Even a Time Machine backup can be an hour behind, and that's if you've been constantly connected to a network with a Time Machine NAS available.

Oh, and backups fail too. Including Time Machine backups. I've had several fail.

There is no defensible reason for soldering the storage and making it unrecoverable due to unrelated failures of the computer. It's not a valid way of keeping the data from being stolen, that's what encryption is for.

What makes all this so much worse is how Apple has tied so many different systems together in their recent laptops. Virtually any part of the logic board can make the entire system fail and lead to unrecoverable data. Including the Touch Bar circuitry. Watch a few dozen of Louis Rossmann's videos where he traces down the ridiculously common and simple problems that kill MacBooks.

The only way you can justify defending Apple's current portable design is by being completely ignorant of just how pointlessly fragile and single-point-of-failure they have become.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfdlab and Bacillus
Most everyone is complaining about this, but I'm curious how many have had to take advantage of this capability? Anyone?
Ah. Like verifying usage data to conclude you actually don't need seatbelts on airflights ?
 
Wow.

I'm not sure why anyone would trust their data to one of these machines. Your entire installation could literally evaporate at any moment. Apple's newer laptops are already notorious for encountering various failures, and now even a single one of those failures can take out your data too.

If they were smart, they would have designated one of the TB ports as a "diagnostics port" that could be used to inject power into the system and bootup the T2 chip in a recovery mode independently from the rest of the logic board. From there, it should be possible to recover the data from the SSD since you shouldn't need to fully boot the machine to access it when the T2 already has full access.

The fact Apple didn't design their machine to accommodate this only highlights their growing contempt towards their user base and overall arrogance when it comes to hardware maintainability and servicing.

-SC
 
Wow.

I'm not sure why anyone would trust their data to one of these machines. Your entire installation could literally evaporate at any moment. Apple's newer laptops are already notorious for encountering various failures, and now even a single one of those failures can take out your data too.

If they were smart, they would have designated one of the TB ports as a "diagnostics port" that could be used to inject power into the system and bootup the T2 chip in a recovery mode independently from the rest of the logic board. From there, it should be possible to recover the data from the SSD since you shouldn't need to fully boot the machine to access it when the T2 already has full access.

The fact Apple didn't design their machine to accommodate this only highlights their growing contempt towards their user base and overall arrogance when it comes to hardware maintainability and servicing.

-SC
It really leads me to believe that Apple ultimately wants to merge the Mac line and MacOS with iOS mobile devices. They all become non-repairable/non-upgradable throw-away devices. The only cure for a broken or underpowered device is to buy a new one. Another article on this forum this morning concerns a new Apple store opening in Milan. In one of the photos of the store's interior, there is absolutely no product in sight other than Apple Watch bands. I get it that the photo was taken some days before the store is to open, but wouldn't even the Apple marketing folks think that long time Apple customers would notice the absence of anything but watch bands showing on the floor? No Macs, no iPhones, no iPads to be seen.
 
I love the MacOS, but whenever I use my MBPro 15 from 2016... the battery life is awful... I'll barely get 3 to 4 hours, and we're just talking web, emails, and maybe office applications. The butterfly keyboard is alright, but the shallow depth of travel means it gets tiring to type for an extended period of time. I have dongles hanging around. And it would be nice if a few basic things were upgradeable (RAM, storage).

... and yes, I back up regularly, but there have been instances where the backup was imperfect, or for some reason, it just failed.

I love the Apple aesthetic, but I think the goal of achieving thinness is now sacrificing basic functionality.

I'll might end up switching to Lenovo's ThinkPad line up. Windows 10 is good enough these days. Ah well...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfdlab
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.