So by this rational I should either:
A. Run an ultra book and hackintosh it to support my Apple only tools I use? This is in response to the 'sufficient selection of competition products available' comment btw
Strange reply. I mentioned the Ultrabooks as an example for progress that changed the whole market, despite being belittled at the beginning. If you really want to hackintosh something, there are enough huge and heavy "professional-grade" notebooks out there, that also offer big and/or swappable batteries.
The better advice, though, would probably be to adjust your workflow accordingly (as a professional user usually does): Either to the available selection of Apple hardware or to a different OS platform.
or
B. Wait for the MacBook Pro-Pro - the device for actual professionals?
Mankind also developed a MacBook Pro with a great battery that isn't THAT big in all honesty.
You make me curious: Which MacBook Pro has a "great battery" that is better than the one in a 1st gen rMBP or a current MBP?
Not to mention, there are way more people who own the PREVIOUS gen (2011-and prior) who don't care about a thinner MacBook Pro either.
Judging by Apple's market and stock success, I tend to believe that they know their markets and opportunities and decide by commercial and strategic rationales. Surely there are people who don't care about a thinner notebook, but if they did not purchase anything since 2011 or longer, chances are their demands would already be more than fulfilled with a current MBP.
If they prefer to stick to their outdated tech for whatever reason, they are not of interest for a big company anyway. So why should Apple develop and produce products in homeopathic doses for those few people perhaps interested, but (more often than not) not buying, because it's too expensive / too slim / is lacking ports / has lacking battery time?!
The ultrabook argument is interesting too as they were originally positioned against the 2012-2015 rMBPs.
"Against"? You mean they were meant to complement the notebook portfolio, with the focus on mobility, right?
So for mobility for those who don't want Pro notebooks, there's the retina MacBook which sure only has one port, but does a great job for those who aren't trying to work in the Pro space.
Wow - elitist much? Care to share your opinion of what the "Pro space" actually is?
Take a poll and check the results, nobody demanded a thinner MacBook.
Henry Ford: "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses". Or in other words: "Everyone is for progress, but noone likes the changes that go with it."
You said a bit unwieldy, but you didn't demand it.
Rear guard battle.
You asked: "I'd like
ONE owner of the 2012-2015 generation of Retina MacBook Pro to chime in and tell me they wanted a thinner notebook."
I told you: "*raises hand* I'd want a thinner notebook. "
If you would have written "demand" in your original post, I'd have written that word in my reply as well. Deliberately ignoring the fact that neither you nor me are in a position to actually "demand" a product from a huge company like Apple.
Maybe it's not us "Pro's" who should be looking for the competitor's offerings- especially given Tim's recent comments about Apple not ignoring the Pro space (all IMHO mind you).
Why haven't you already reacted and adjusted your workflow accordingly? Especially, as Apple's negligence for their "Pro" products (especially Macs) is going on for several years now. You just need to look at them acting, not at Phil or Tim talking.
Is it so hard to realize that the "Pro" moniker is not representing a generally accepted, common definition of a certain group of products or people, but is merely marketing speech by Apple?