Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-03-16 at 12.35.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-16 at 12.35.07 PM.png
    443.9 KB · Views: 2,421
Love my iPhone X, but you could have solved the UI bug at least on he ad...
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-03-16 at 1.35.30 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2018-03-16 at 1.35.30 PM.jpg
    381.1 KB · Views: 193
  • Like
Reactions: canesalato
That ad was entertaining in the same way the Microsoft Surface dancing ads were. I'm sure someone thought they were amusing, but they aren't to my taste at all.

If Apple wanted to get the the FaceID unlock message across they would have been much better off showing one person across multiple scenes with a hat, sunglasses, long hair, short hair, bleached hair, a beard, a huuuggge pimple, and other changes to demonstrate FaceID "just works" regardless of how you change your appearance.

This ad missed the mark pretty bad IMHO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yallmeansall
Ever since Steve Jobs passed away and that clueless MBA suit Tim Cook has been CEO, Apple’s ads have been both forgettable and filled with clutter. That’s because that mediocre hack Cook got rid of Jobs’s decades-long practice of using TWBA\Chiat\Day (one of the best ad agencies on the planet, the same agency that did the legendary “1984” commercial and the “Get a Mac” campaign) and instead decided to create Apple’s ads in-house.

Thank you. :apple:
 
Ever since Steve Jobs passed away and that clueless MBA suit Tim Cook has been CEO, Apple’s ads have been both forgettable and filled with clutter. That’s because that mediocre hack Cook got rid of Jobs’s decades-long practice of using TWBA\Chiat\Day (one of the best ad agencies on the planet, the same agency that did the legendary “1984” commercial and the “Get a Mac” campaign) and instead decided to create Apple’s ads in-house.

That was probably Schiller's decision, as he is head of Marcom. I doubt Tim gets too involved with marketing because he knows it's way outside his area of expertise.

I don't disagree that the ads have by and large been worse since they started producing ads internally though.
 
Ever since Steve Jobs passed away and that clueless MBA suit Tim Cook has been CEO, Apple’s ads have been both forgettable and filled with clutter. That’s because that mediocre hack Cook got rid of Jobs’s decades-long practice of using TWBA\Chiat\Day (one of the best ad agencies on the planet, the same agency that did the legendary “1984” commercial and the “Get a Mac” campaign) and instead decided to create Apple’s ads in-house.
Except for the fact that they still use them, in LA. I'm not saying that they may use others as well.

Just my opinion, the ad made me laugh, was light and fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maine82
It's their typical bland, lowest common denominator kind of ad. Like their TV Shows, and the musical acts they invite onstage (U2?!), etc... Just tacky, cluttered, kitschy,... but it earns them loads of money. Gotta reach the masses (who, overall, are simple, unrefined and have no taste).

I, too, am a bit of an art snob, so I'd prefer the more Zen, minimalist, Scandinavian sensibility, the clean uncluttered beautiful stuff Jobs went for... it worked for boutiquey upstart Apple, but that's no longer who Apple is, now that their products are mass produced in China, fairly inexpensive and used by everyone, including teens and 8 year olds... a company that's gotta answer to their shareholders.
 
Last edited:
This ad demonstrates how far the Apple brand has fallen. I love Apple. But what happened the ads that expressed the importance of technologies such as Siri, TouchID and now FaceID. For example ads that show how Siri can help in an emergency situation. This ad expresses disorder.. from a brand that used to stand for perfection down to the packing material used for the boxing of each product.

uh, ipod ads have long expressed disorder and did not really demonstrate the importance of the tech.
 
What a terrible ad. Are they trying to imply that FaceID grants a user access to things that they should not have access to? (By the way, I love FaceID, just not this ad)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.