Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I prefer the alternate title, Morning Wars .... shoulda gone with that for the American version.
 
Apple won't have enough interesting content for another 2-3 years at least, compared to Disney and Hulu altogether, even Netflix or HBO. They're just too powerful. One or two good shows won't make them among the best streaming services.
Having spent 45 minutes looking for something decent on Netflix last night, I am starting to question what the heck they really have that's any good, particularly as they start to lose licensed content like the Office. Netflix has like 3-4 good original shows and tons of garbage.

Disney's content is lightyears (pun intended) ahead and I'd be absolutely terrified as a NFLX shareholder long term. All these companies are going to get their own service and you need owned content and tons of money. Netflix doesn't have a ton of money.
 
Apple won't have enough interesting content for another 2-3 years at least, compared to Disney and Hulu altogether, even Netflix or HBO. They're just too powerful. One or two good shows won't make them among the best streaming services.
Netflix didn't rely on exclusive content for years and years. I think people are forgetting that Apple can just license content to fill in the gaps, and boy do they have the money for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mw360
Did anybody else have a headache after watching that trailer? I did, and that's not a great first impression of the series. I'd love to see Steve Carell in a comedy series again, but I don't think this aims to be a comedy series. That said, I hope there will be some thoughtful examination of bias in news reporting, but I'm not holding by breath.
 
Having spent 45 minutes looking for something decent on Netflix last night, I am starting to question what the heck they really have that's any good, particularly as they start to lose licensed content like the Office. Netflix has like 3-4 good original shows and tons of garbage.

Disney's content is lightyears (pun intended) ahead and I'd be absolutely terrified as a NFLX shareholder long term. All these companies are going to get their own service and you need owned content and tons of money. Netflix doesn't have a ton of money.

Sounds like you need to become a content broker. Maybe you can become Netflix's content warden.
 
I think you're going to see a lot of people confused over what this is supposed to be. It's being advertised as a drama, the 'teaser' sounds like a drama, but it's headlined by three people known for comedy. This is probably going to go the same way as Tina Fey's "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot". A good movie, but totally not what was expected going in.

I respectfully disagree, as Steve Carell has put forth several good non-comedy movies as of late, Reese has certainly done drama well, and Jennifer...well, everyone lovers Jennifer....
 
The morning show's logo looks just like the boring company's logo. Who copied whose logo?
 
Given that Disney+ combined with Hulu and ESPN is going to destroy Apple's offering, I can see Apple trying to compete by creating an attractive bundle with Apple TV+, Apple Music, and Apple Arcade. Otherwise they're going to get destroyed.

It was already showing sings of being dead in the water right when they showed three different subscription costs, they should have just announced it as a bundle right out the gate.
 
I think people are forgetting that Apple can just license content to fill in the gaps, and boy do they have the money for it.

The problem with that is that the studios are starting to pull their content from third party streaming services. Disney (who now owns Fox), Warner Bros. and NBC/Universal have all announced plans to pull content and create their own services. The amount of stuff out there to license could be drying up.

As it stands, with what Apple has currently announced for ATV+, I do not plan to continuously subscribe. I'll sub, watch the 1 or 2 shows I'm interested in and then cancel. Repeat when the next seasons are released. This is how I treat CBS All Access, I sub when ST Discovery is airing, cancel when it is not.
 
Love the hyperbole. Apple will be destroyed or can’t compete or whatever. I’m sure the people at Apple have no idea they’ll be humiliated, destroyed, and have no chance whatsoever. None. I’m sure they are working on hopes and dreams that they’ll be the #1 streaming entity from day 1....

Or, maybe they’re smart enough to have thought through the issues and maybe have a strategy that we don’t see yet? But, no, they’ll be in financial and existential ruin for daring to do any form of streaming without revealing all the details to the masses.
 
I just hope the production quality will be on par with HBO and not Netflix. We don’t need more of the mediocre content.
 
Why cut a promo for a series without showing the faces of any of the stars, each of whom was reportedly paid $1M per episode?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nol2001
Ah, yes, a battle of morning TV shows....because this is 1987? Unless the demographic of The Morning Show is retirees (who actually watch morning programs), I can't imagine a more out-of-touch premise. Good lord.
 
It’s beyond belief that Apple won’t release the price for the streaming service as Disney Plus is about to launch
Disney+ is launching on November 12. Apple TV+ is expected to launch on September, most likely coinciding with iOS 13/new iPhone launch. My guess is that Apple will announce Apple TV+ specifics on September 10, the date Apple is expected to unveil the new iPhone.

As for the price, I expect it to cost $9.99/month, just like Apple Music and Apple News+, with 1 month free trial.

The key question is whether Apple will offer bundling to ease subscription fatigue, such as $19.99/month that lets you pick 3 services (buy 2 get 1 free).
 
Who would pay to watch low quality content when there's so much free quality content?
 
If this is going to be anything like The Newsroom count me in

Indeed, I was gonna ask… from the teaser, it looks a bit like a The Newsroom rehash. Only the execution of that was a little lacking, and so far, nothing in the teaser makes me think "oh yeah, this will be way better"?
 
At this point it makes sense to let all the other services announce their pricing. Not sure what Apple’s strategy is just yet but they don’t have a back catalog so it can’t be priced the same way.

I imagine the "strategy" is this
1) Hype- Apple tends not to advertise stuff too much. They leave it to the people themselves to talk about the product and hype it up for free. (at least before leaks were more common than ever). Like in this case, we are just talking-wow, what the price would be- just keeping ATV+ brand in our brains and on tongues and spreading it around.
2) Keep potential customers interested as long as possible- if they announce price now, example-23,99 $ month. Literally everybody, that was on the fence about subscribing, will bail to Disney or Netflix or torrents or whatever.
 
I think the Apple credit card will be a success and iTunes as a content distribution platform was a success, but original entertainment content creation is not that easy … I'm 50/50 on this one.

It's a risk/reward venture. If it fails, they will have spent tens of millions down the drain. If it succeeds, in 5 years it will be adding billions to their revenue stream annually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: erniefairchild1
The key question is whether Apple will offer bundling to ease subscription fatigue, such as $19.99/month that lets you pick 3 services (buy 2 get 1 free).

I really hope Apple will offer bundles.

Something like this – man, with all these pluses I've to write a math equation:

Bundle = ((Apple Music) + (Apple News+) + (Apple TV+))
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.