Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, I've been a mac guy since 7100/66...I have wanted an iphone since day one but have always been partial to Verizon. So I decided to jump and get a droid x, it nice. Is it comparable...it's similar and will do way more than I'll ever need and will(with a little effort) sync with my mac. If the iphone had been on Verizon I would have purchased it.

obliviously you are not mac enough.
 
Over the next year I think it will become clear that Google isn't really just an iOS copycat. Look at the new features today - the flip phone feature is pretty cool. In six months you will have a web-based Android market, cloud based streaming music, google docs with editing ability, all sorts of TV streaming products and a brand new UI. The competition in this field will be intense over the next few years and Google is a formidable competitor. Should be exciting.
 
Uh, slow down everyone. Does it matter that Nokia has the #1 spot and has had that spot in the past? No. We never cared.

So if Android (in total) moves ahead of just the iPhone by itself, why would that matter?

Apple's goal was never to be #1 in phone sales. Just to carve out a significant and profitable chunk of the market. The phone market is far too big for any one company to take it over. It will always be fragmented. The key is to pick up a big fragment. Apple has done that. Seems as if the Android combined market has done it too. Everyone wins.

Exactly the only reason market share matters is if the company is viable and will still be around for the service life of the product and for a platform product like a smartphone maybe beyond that if a really like what they make and would want to keep buying. Ok so a platform product then we also want the app store to be viable.

Even in Apples Darkest Days developers still made lots of money with professional software on the platform, sure no games which is what drove the Windows platform, but a lot of those games had a big share of Mac in their production chain so apple still had a bite of all that cash too.
 
Over the next year I think it will become clear that Google isn't really just an iOS copycat. Look at the new features today - the flip phone feature is pretty cool. In six months you will have a web-based Android market, cloud based streaming music, google docs with editing ability, all sorts of TV streaming products and a brand new UI. The competition in this field will be intense over the next few years and Google is a formidable competitor. Should be exciting.

That's exactly Google's problem. They copy the majority of the user interface and then slap a bunch of new features in the OS claiming that makes it superior. But the superior part was really the user interface and how well it flows, not all the features you can shove in it.
 
Could we please drop this ridiculous argument already? The consumer pays the same amount for an Android phone or an iPhone. Typically $199.

The lame "Apple's overpriced hardware" chestnut doesn't work in the mobile space. Deal with it.

Actually you need to look at the total cost of ownership, not just the price paid for the initial hardware.

AT&T is substantially more costly than say Sprint. I have two Sprint Android phones but would gladly have 2 iPhones if it wasn't for the fact it would cost me hundreds of dollars more per year over a two year contract.
 
That's exactly Google's problem. They copy the majority of the user interface and then slap a bunch of new features in the OS claiming that makes it superior. But the superior part was really the user interface and how well it flows, not all the features you can shove in it.

did'nt google buy android in 2005? we dont know what that os look like before or how the user interface was, google never said it was superior
but the features were, cut and paste,google maps,multitasking,those were great additions that apple decided to add to there ios also , exept for maps i think,

the more features the better i think if you dont like something it can always be uninstall.
 
Actually you need to look at the total cost of ownership, not just the price paid for the initial hardware.

AT&T is substantially more costly than say Sprint. I have two Sprint Android phones but would gladly have 2 iPhones if it wasn't for the fact it would cost me hundreds of dollars more per year over a two year contract.

Sprint only made there plans affordable because they were bleeding customers left and right. Once Sprint regains it's footing you can kiss those sweet plans good-bye.
 
Android will sell ship on a lot of devices. Given the multi-manufacturer model, no doubt more than Apple.

But 2 points:
1) This particular study doesn't define devices called 'iOS'. Just iPhones, or touches and iPads as well?

2) Having gone down the '2-fer' route (buy one, get one free), stats about Android are now permanently in doubt in my mind. Anyone can give away product. Not the same as selling it.

as per #2, does not Apple give those Touch thingys away free with school computer purchases etc?. stats about iPod sales are now permanently in doubt in your mind also right?
 
Personally, I'd go for the bigger market if that was my only criteria as a developer, but I'm sure iOS is still potentially very lucrative if you get the right app accepted in the store. Best of luck!

Actually, iOS is still a far larger platform/market than Android. One superior quarter of Android smartphone sales does not a "bigger market" make.
 
Hasn't the iPhone had voice control for a year already? And if Android voice control works as well as my Google Voice voicemail transcription...I'll pass.

Unless Apple drastically improved the quality of its Voice Control in 4.0 - it's not nearly as good as Google's implementation. Last I used Voice Control on my 3GS - it was practically useless. Since I switched to Android, I find myself using Voice Control all the time.. and I will probably use it even more with the latest round of updates Google released today.

Android is hardly blowing the doors off iOS with current features. And the overall interface still leaves much to be desired.

Have you tried 2.2 on a recent 1Ghz SnapDragon handset? In terms of fluidity and polish - the UI is probably about 95% on par with latest iPhone. In terms of pure features, flexibility and customization - it's about 1-1.5 years ahead of iOS 4.
 
Actually, iOS is still a far larger platform/market than Android. One superior quarter of Android smartphone sales does not a "bigger market" make.

Possibly - certainly from a US perspective I'm sure you're right. But Apple have had a couple of year's head start over Android, and if Android keep accelerating their take-up (and there's no sign currently that they won't do that) then I think they will soon get the bigger market share between the two. They're probably already achieving that outside of the peculiar market in the US.
 
Have you tried 2.2 on a recent 1Ghz SnapDragon handset? In terms of fluidity and polish - the UI is probably about 95% on par with latest iPhone. In terms of pure features, flexibility and customization - it's about 1-1.5 years ahead of iOS 4.

I have not yet tried 2.2 yet, but all the reviews I've read indicate Android still lags iOS when it comes to the overall UI and user experience.

Gizmodo said:

The UI is largely the same—it's still more complex and less elegant than either the iPhone or Palm's webOS—but it's striking how much nicer it feels thanks to even a few tweaks.

They also said:

basic things like copy-and-paste can feel as slippery as brain surgery on a snail

and

Except the touch keyboard. It still feels like you're typing with two fingers glued together

Bottom line: from all the professional reviews I've read by knowledgable technorati intimately familiar with both OSes, Android has still not caught up to iOS - let alone passed it - in many areas - despite the most ardent arguments to the contrary from the Android proponents.

As for pure "features, flexibility and customization" - in what features does iOS lag behind Android by 1-1.5 years? As far as flexibility and customization goes - these are not necessarily points of advancement or innovation as Apple has chosen not to follow the same route as Google when it comes to being able to tweak the operating environment.


Possibly - certainly from a US perspective I'm sure you're right. But Apple have had a couple of year's head start over Android, and if Android keep accelerating their take-up (and there's no sign currently that they won't do that) then I think they will soon get the bigger market share between the two. They're probably already achieving that outside of the peculiar market in the US.

Not possibly, certainly. Does Android have anything to counter the almost-3-years-old iPod Touch? No. And nothing yet to counter the iPad. Apple has a huge user base for iOS and is the place to be for developers right now from both a market size and potential profitability perspective.
 
I have not yet tried 2.2 yet, but all the reviews I've read indicate Android still lags iOS when it comes to the overall UI and user experience.

Well, try it sometime. I did acknowledge some things are still not 100% on par (Android copy/paste certainly needs improvement).. But coming from iPhone - the UI on my EVO running 2.2 is just as smooth and responsive as any iPhone. 4.3" screen doesn't hurt either. ;)

As for pure "features, flexibility and customization" - in what features does iOS lag behind Android by 1-1.5 years?

Let's see.. proper notification system (vs. overlapping pop-ups that stack on top of each other).. multi-size widgets.. content shortcuts.. active wallpapers.. voice control that's actually useable.. proper file sysem.. API-based cloud-to-phone push.. And those're just UI-oriented features (not even mentioning WiFi hotspot, Flash 10.1, etc).

So yeah, I'd say Apple has some catching up to do. But I am sure Apple will tell you "our users don't need these features".. they are "too confusing" etc. Until they finally introduce them themselves, then of course they become "magical".
 
Open Your Eyes!

What models are Nokia selling 111,000 of? I can't even remember when I saw a Nokia phone in stores in the last 4 years.

Well I see tons of Nokia, World is not just US, here in Europe Nokia is the leader, and I own a Mac but as mobile phone Nokia just rules! Symbian is a great OS, with very powerfull memory management, it just need a face lift, thing that Nokia is doing, quality is so much better than the iPhone. And I even can do 3g video calls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Well, it would make sense that Android will capture a larger market share given the sheer number of manufacturers making devices.

However, I have yet to meet a single person who uses an Android based handset. Not that *my* social circle counts for anything, but the smartphones that I personally see in people's hands are either RIM or Apple devices... so far.

Androids not all that big here in Canada. It's either you support the home grown RIM or Apple. Android is essentially non-existant here.
 
Androids not all that big here in Canada. It's either you support the home grown RIM or Apple. Android is essentially non-existant here.

We only have Rogers to blame for that. They have only carried sub-par models so far (Samsung Spica, HTC Dream/Magic).

With Telus and Bell getting into Android and now pushing the higher end models, you'll see that change somewhat. Not to mention the Galaxy S coming.
 
Hasn't the iPhone had voice control for a year already? And if Android voice control works as well as my Google Voice voicemail transcription...I'll pass.

android's voice control was better before the latest update. with the latest update it totally stomps iOS voice control.

That said, Android is hardly blowing the doors off iOS with current features. And the overall interface still leaves much to be desired.

you mean actual features that ship with the phone? Android without a doubt. That's why when you hear apple nerds trying to diss some android phone its always something about how its not as smooth, or how the interface isnt as good (because its not ios duh). Or its not as pretty or elegant. It's always some stupid subjective thing. Rarely any criticism about the actual featureset of the OS.
 
Unless Apple drastically improved the quality of its Voice Control in 4.0 - it's not nearly as good as Google's implementation. Last I used Voice Control on my 3GS - it was practically useless. Since I switched to Android, I find myself using Voice Control all the time.. and I will probably use it even more with the latest round of updates Google released today.



Have you tried 2.2 on a recent 1Ghz SnapDragon handset? In terms of fluidity and polish - the UI is probably about 95% on par with latest iPhone. In terms of pure features, flexibility and customization - it's about 1-1.5 years ahead of iOS 4.

I have HTC Wildfire with 2.2 and it's nowhere near as smooth as iPod touch 2G with iOS 4.
 
So yeah, I'd say Apple has some catching up to do. But I am sure Apple will tell you "our users don't need these features".. they are "too confusing" etc. Until they finally introduce them themselves, then of course they become "magical".

After using Android 2.2 i could say the same thing. Looks great as a list on a sheet of white paper, but in real life doesn't look that good. And iOS copy/paste is way better than Android copy/paste, so could be magical for all i care.
 
People on here need to try Android before knocking it...

I had an iPhone 3GS with iOS 4 on it for a while and it was a great phone. Games on it are really its strongest point compared to the Android platform but feature wise Android as an OS blows iOS out of the water. "Speech to text" is flat out amazing and adds so much to what it can do, the map application (go figure) works a bit better/faster and the OS over all is MUCH more customizable. The first time I played with my friends Aria, I was blown away (and he was an iPhone user as well).

Don't knock Android, right now the MOST powerful handsets on the market are all Android (sorry iPhone 4) and the most advanced OS is Android 2.2 (you could even argue 2.1 is a bit more advanced than iOS4 having widgets and what not). Don't be afraid of the unknown if you like the iPhones form factor and you are tired of iOS just not giving you enough depth, go check out the Galaxy S line of phones. Pretty much same CPU w a fast (much faster) GPU than iPhone 4 and then a better screen and all the other Bells and whistles including BlueTooth 3! Apple had a good run and is definitely responsible for getting smart phones where they are today, but they have some work ahead of them if they want to stay in the game long term.
 
Žalgiris;10826965 said:
After using Android 2.2 i could say the same thing. Looks great as a list on a sheet of white paper, but in real life doesn't look that good. And iOS copy/paste is way better than Android copy/paste, so could be magical for all i care.

What phone did you use Android 2.2 on? Each manufacturers UI changes how certain features work. Also I'm sure you didn't get into all the "Bells and Whistles" of Android. Samsungs UI destroys iOS's in pretty much every way possible (mostly because they copied iOS's and has all the extra stuff Android has ;) )

Also you compared an HTC wildfire to in iPod touch 2G. I think the touch has almost 2x the ram and is a full 150mhz faster than the wildfire. It looks like an Aria though and Android screams on that phone.
 
I had an iPhone 3GS with iOS 4 on it for a while and it was a great phone. Games on it are really its strongest point compared to the Android platform but feature wise Android as an OS blows iOS out of the water. "Speech to text" is flat out amazing and adds so much to what it can do, the map application (go figure) works a bit better/faster and the OS over all is MUCH more customizable. The first time I played with my friends Aria, I was blown away (and he was an iPhone user as well).

Don't knock Android, right now the MOST powerful handsets on the market are all Android (sorry iPhone 4) and the most advanced OS is Android 2.2 (you could even argue 2.1 is a bit more advanced than iOS4 having widgets and what not). Don't be afraid of the unknown if you like the iPhones form factor and you are tired of iOS just not giving you enough depth, go check out the Galaxy S line of phones. Pretty much same CPU w a fast (much faster) GPU than iPhone 4 and then a better screen and all the other Bells and whistles including BlueTooth 3! Apple had a good run and is definitely responsible for getting smart phones where they are today, but they have some work ahead of them if they want to stay in the game long term.

PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT NUMBERS! People care about experience and easy of use. Design + Ease of Use + Integration with OS + Support Quality + Apps = WHAT COUNTS.

iPhone still owns any Android phone out there.
 
What phone did you use Android 2.2 on?
Wildfire and i had it with 2.1 for quite some time.
Each manufacturers UI changes how certain features work.

That's right there is no consistency and adds to fragmentation of already very fragmented system.

Also I'm sure you didn't get into all the "Bells and Whistles" of Android.

Standard reply i hear all the time. First is "try it's awesome and kills iPhone hands down" and second if you didn't like it is "Well means you are too stupid".

Samsungs UI destroys iOS's in pretty much every way possible (mostly because they copied iOS's and has all the extra stuff Android has ;) )

Biggest amount of lipstick on a pig i have ever seen.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.