Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It doesn't matter what they price this at. While the sound is good - actually very good - it's crippled by software.

I preordered one and received it the second week of February. Got it all hooked up and realized it's just an extension of a single iPhone. The d@mn thing is a PERSONAL speaker - in the middle of a public space.

This silly little speaker is just another Apple push for their subscription music service. **** that!

Returned it 3 days later and went back to the Sonos Play 5.

I swear I wonder every day if I'm no longer Apple's target customer: despite having been an Apple customer for almost twenty years and spent well over $25K on Apple products in that time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Keep on with pointless and overpriced devices like this and Apple watch...
And Apple will look set to dominate with yet another record-breaking quarter?

You do know that the Apple watch market is for all intents and purposes the smartwatch market, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DNichter
Apple is, I’d guess, holding back global availability until AirPlay 2 is ready. Which, to double-guess, is September with the next major OS release. With AirPlay 2, HomePod stops being a quasi-beta product, and then I buy another one.
 
The problem with the HomePod is that its highly overpriced compared to how much it cost to assemble and shouldn't cost no more than $229.
 
Build a time capsule and AirPort Extreme into it, and stick a plug for an old fashioned airplay speaker setup into it, and we'll talk.

And make a cheaper version of HomePod similar to the Airport express to make a mesh wi-fi network at home, so with one device you bring connectivity and music+siri to other rooms
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderSkunk
And Apple will look set to dominate with yet another record-breaking quarter?

You do know that the Apple watch market is for all intents and purposes the smartwatch market, right?


I know and I am a grumpy die hard mac fan which makes me feel sad to see the amount of time they put in consumer products and not making a real pro mac book pro or Mac Pro for 5 years. But I know the money is there too.
Maybe its time for Apple Pro and Apple Consumer divisions.
 
That’s a pretty minuscule percentage of the population that buys smart speakers. The HomePod, thus far, is a dud at it’s current price point.

If you look at the HomePod and all you see is a more expensive, dumber Dot, then you’ve badly miscategorized it. The same thing happened with the Apple Watch at first — “it’s just a much more expensive FitBit, and is doing very badly in the FitBit category.”
 
Apple has only released this HomePod to 3 countries. I live in Canada and it is still not available. I managed to get one on a vacation to the U.S. and I love it. But, find it insulting that they will not release it everywhere. Perhaps this sales figure would be much higher if released to all countries.

Manufacturing and logistics is not simple. I am sure they would have wanted to bring to more countries, but the product was delayed as is.
[doublepost=1526646038][/doublepost]
And make a cheaper version of HomePod similar to the Airport express to make a mesh wi-fi network at home, so with one device you bring connectivity and music+siri to other rooms

This would be a great idea.
 
I would love to have a product that fails and gets 600000 sales each worth of $350

The determination of "fail" or "succeed" in business world isn't determined by the volume, even at a pricepoint that it moves at.

The determination of success in business is profitability. More importantly, Return on Investment. Apple will have created financial plans and budgets that will revolve around certain revenue necessities to offset costs involved with bringing the product to market (from inception to transaction). This determination is really the only "was it successful" metric that is really of value.

Apple might have sold 600,00 unites bringing in $210,000,000 in revenues, but that number in of itself doesn't determine success or failure.

FOr example, as you said, you'dLOVE a "failed" product that gets 600,000 units shipped. But what while bringing in $210,000,000 in revenues, it cost you $300,000,000 to R&D? What if you actually produced 1m units expecting to bring in $350,000,000 in revenue to offset those costs?

Honestly, Nobody here on MacRumors can make the claim of sucess or failure unless we know what Apple's financial budgets for this device was. All we can do is play Armchair CEO (which I do often :p) and make guesses based on rumour and speculation. 600,000 units doesn't sound bad IMHO, but the rumours of Apple reducing orders for more from vendors and reports of units sitting not moving on shelves leads me to believe they over-estimated how many units they would sell
 
Amazon and Google have created market leading standards for smart speakers. Price over sound quality is the major selling point. If this trend continues, Apple is out of business.

Lmaooo out of the HomePod business, or business in general?

Where do you guys come up with these statements.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DNichter
600k is pretty low volume for Apple, but I think comparing it to the smart speaker market is a bit disingenuous. How does it compare to Sonos?

You can't really say that people chose a $30 Echo Dot or $30 Google Home Mini over a $350 speaker, because those "speakers" sound like literal trash, you are better off playing music out of your iPhone speaker. That is my point - HomePod is bought for playing music, Echo/Home are bought for checking the weather every morning. Sonos One would be a much better comparison as they are more functionally equivalent. Or at least limiting the Alexa comparison to the full size echo's which I am sure are much less prevalent.
 
I'm well on the record here that I'm not a HomePod fan as it was released. But, 600K really isn't a terrible # for a product that shipped without it's full claimed feature set and almost non-existent marketing by Apple, even in it's own stores. Peanuts for Apple, yes, but only if Apple was really pushing sales. It's not. It's mostly a viral info product.

Apple has not admitted as much, but HomePod really feels like AppleTV when it was released. The much noted "it's a hobby" kind of product that truly dedicated Applephiles (vs technophiles) will buy while Apple gets the kinks out. Eventually it could be a decent general consumer product and, hopefully, a full line. Will be interesting to see how Apple nurtures it, and if it will become more than essentially an Apple Music accessory that it is today.
[doublepost=1526648291][/doublepost]
I swear I wonder every day if I'm no longer Apple's target customer: despite having been an Apple customer for almost twenty years and spent well over $25K on Apple products in that time.

I know how you feel as and "old timer" myself -- Mac since '88, dabbled with Apple II's in HS. Part of the problem with aging is getting use to what once was transition into something else entirely. That is Apple right now. In my life computers have gone from business machines to something everyone had and back to the future of today where they are again mostly business machines. That's not a business that can sustain Apple because Apple never served main st. business like MS did, just the more artistic industries.

Even iPhone growth has really peaked, so services is Apple's next growth sector. All it's new hardware is going to support that endeavor. We see it with AW LTE, now HomePod, which incidentally isn't compatible with Home Sharing so you can stream music from your Mac to HP. Wonder why!

So yeah, Apple is become less relevant to us aging Gen Xers and even late baby boomers. We've progressed to the demographic age that doesn't matter.
 
And Apple will look set to dominate with yet another record-breaking quarter?

You do know that the Apple watch market is for all intents and purposes the smartwatch market, right?
Out of curiosity, does it ever feel like a let down to know the richest company in the world, doesn't care to spend a little money to make Siri better, or to fix any of the multiple hardware and software issues? I mean look at the quality batteries they use, or how horrible iOS is? The fact that cheaper Android handsets beat the almighty bionic a11 in real world usage must feel like an insult from the company that only cares about its own profits, and not its customers.

With that being said, what does Apple having a record breaking quarter/year do for the customer. I am not talking about investors or someone who has stocks, but strictly a customer. It just seems that finances/profit is the new deflection tactic that fans use to switch the goalposts of users comments when they have no answer.
 
Except it really doesn’t sound that great. I returned mine. I was intrigued by the idea of controlling Apple Music with voice commands and must admit that Siri worked quite well for that purpose. However, sound quality does not compare to my Sonos Play5 (which I consider to have good, but hardly great, sound).

I’m sure HomePod could sound a lot better if Apple allowed the user to adjust settings or select different EQ settings on the fly. As is it’s way too much bass most of the time and sometimes there’s so much separation that vocals especially sound almost disembodied. I was not impressed. To my ears the sound is somewhat cold and overly processed whereas the Play5 sounds warmer and more balanced. I played a number of songs on both devices, alternately muting one, then the other, and I always preferred the Play5.

600K shipped. How many returns? I wish Apple would get back to focusing on the Mac and stop wasting energy on me-too products that aren’t ready for prime time. The old Apple wowed us when a new product was released. Now we get products announced too soon, shipped late, and feature incomplete with vague promises of updates to come.


"Except it really doesn’t sound that great."

Mine sounds excellent, especially after the update. I especially appreciate the automatic room acoustics equalization each time HomePod is moved, and that the sound is excellent no matter where I'm located in the room. Also like that I can communicate with HomePod in a normal voice no matter how loud it is currently playing music, and no matter where I am in the room - even 20 feet away.

And that I can watch videos on any of my Macs and stream the audio portion to HomePod. The real plus is that it works seamlessly with Apple Music, always on, never having to boot it or something else up. And never worrying about an open mic to google or Amazon in my house.


"600K shipped. How many returns?"

I don't know. Geez, why would I care? How about Amazon's and Google's shipments, how many returns? Same thing...why would I care about that as well? That's something for tech bros to get lathered up about on tech forums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Allow native Spotify support and l’ll buy one no doubt!

Just get an echo dot for $30-50. I will let you use Amazon's music service or if you have Spotify, Spotify as the music services. All of your collections, favorites, and playlist are available with a few words. And it come with Bluetooth and a 1/8" jack you can plug into a proper sound system with big speakers. I use the echo as source for my audio system that plays indoor and in my backyard for parties and dining outside. Best 30 bucks I ever spent.
 
My gripe is with this article itself. The headline claims that Apple sold 600,000 units, but refers to the products by Amazon and Google as shipments. I'm not in sales, but I would think that shipments is a better indicator of a product's penetration into a market. If 100,000 homepods are still on shelves, then it really isn't the same as 600,000 shipments. Additionally, the article that the story is based on (check the link) refers to all three product lines as "shipments" - it does not distinguish between sold and shipments so why is one product in the story referred to differently than the others. Otherwise, the Homepod is a great product, but it is late to the show, too expensive, and is essentially an-iOS device. While their are a ton of Apple users out there, a non-iOS user would be an idiot to get this thing (which is not true for the other devices).

I'ts a bit misleading as none of these companies report unit sales or shipment. Those two terms are often conflated with eachother because of a lack of real numbers directly from the vendor. These numbers tend ot come from 3rd party analysts who collect data elsewhere to compile these.

When talking "shipments" and "sales", often time these numbers just mean devices that have been "sold" or "shipped" from the original company (apple/microsoft/samsung) to end point sales. once they reach 3rd party retailers, they're to have been considered "sold" already. Even if they sit on the store shelves.

any of these numbers rom these 3rd party analysts do need to be taken with a bit of a grain of salt, as they cannot be considered 100% accurate. They're meant to provide an educated guess on to the market health.
 
Apple has only released this HomePod to 3 countries. I live in Canada and it is still not available. I managed to get one on a vacation to the U.S. and I love it. But, find it insulting that they will not release it everywhere. Perhaps this sales figure would be much higher if released to all countries.

Language issues mainly. For products to be able to be sold in Canada, especially voice assistance, they need to be fully available in both English and French. I know SIRI on the phone supports French, but it's possible that hasn't been made to work yet on the HomePod (maybe someone else can answer?)

this also includes packaging, so maybe to maximize US exposure, they only produced the first batch of packaging that was English only because they thought they'd be able to sell enough.

Same issue happened with Google Max. It actually only officially launched in Canada last month.
 
600k is pretty low volume for Apple, but I think comparing it to the smart speaker market is a bit disingenuous. How does it compare to Sonos?

You can't really say that people chose a $30 Echo Dot or $30 Google Home Mini over a $350 speaker, because those "speakers" sound like literal trash, you are better off playing music out of your iPhone speaker. That is my point - HomePod is bought for playing music, Echo/Home are bought for checking the weather every morning. Sonos One would be a much better comparison as they are more functionally equivalent. Or at least limiting the Alexa comparison to the full size echo's which I am sure are much less prevalent.

But, every Echo has Bluetooth and a 1/8" jack. So it can connect to any Bluetooth speaker you can buy. Or to a huge sounds system, just like the rest of your audio gear. And you have your choice of music services. You can uses Amazon's free service, or a wider service like Spotify.

And all of this is before you consider the Alexa eco system where 3rd parties have written hundreds of interface skills that make service and products accessible from Echo devices.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.