Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
But it seems that computer buyers are like car buyers: They want the tailfins to be redesigned every year, even if the chassis, engine, suspension, electrical and braking systems are the same for the past 5 years.

You KNOW it's beyond reason when people refer to a 1 year update cycle as "long". Heck, it takes about half that time just to setup the LOGISTICS for a new design!
Didn't you say you had work to do (even if it was on Windows)?

Regardless Mac Mini and Mac Pro users aren't asking for a completely redesigned computer. What they're asking for is updates to the existing designs (current Mac Mini and former classic Mac Pro). That seems completely reasonable to me.
[doublepost=1533149508][/doublepost]
Not if you ask the share holders.
Note he said:

Tim Cook is the worst thing to happen to Mac since Mac.

And not

Tim Cook is the worst thing to happen to Apple since Mac.
 
You have a point about future proofing, but the rest of the world hasn't caught up to Apple. Since I work in IT, this is very clear to me. No desktops we have are USB-C. Desktops we have don't have thunderbolt. I would guess if you live in an exclusive Apple world, then sure it's a great idea. But since the rest of the world around me uses Windows, just a little aggravating having to rely on adapters all the time.
Since you are an IT Pro, I'm sure you are aware there are simple replacement cables for USB equipment that has replaceable cables, and $2 (or less) PASSIVE adapters (at least you didn't call them "Dongles"!) that can easily clip onto the stuff with captive USB cables (which is also likely the same equipment that will be REPLACED before that USB-C/TB3 Mac is replaced).

And it's not like you have to constantly deal with cable-changes nor adapters. You do it once, and it's DONE. I have never been in an office where people SHARED USB peripherals around on a day-to-day basis.

In short: You are WAY overblowing a "problem" that 10 minutes on Amazon will solve. MUST I provide links?
 
Apple needs to create their own chips and control their own release schedule. The more I think about their relationship with Intel, the less it makes sense.
I'd be willing to wager that inside three years Apple will say adios to Intel
 
  • Like
Reactions: DNichter
That's fine, we disagree then. I don't feel that either ever represented the majority of Mac sales. I think the mini may be the first ARM Mac.
I would tend to agree; followed/preceded quickly by a low-end (non-Pro) MacBook or Air.

I think they will eventually divide the Mac Product line into "consumer" machines that will be ARM-based, and "Pro" machines that will remain Intel-based (at least for now). Because of Apple's spectacular and proven abilities to switch CPU platforms without a hitch, I doubt that anyone will notice any difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
....well let's see here....we have a lineup of MacBook Pro's with keyboards that have the feel of one of those $1.99 keyboards you can get at a computer warehouse, the memory can't be upgraded, oh, and by the way, the SSD is soldered into the logic board on all but the cheapest, so when the write cycles of the SSD become used up you have a dead system that's nothing more than basically have a Jony Ive, ultra thin, stylish piece of metal (and probably yet another class action lawsuit in the making). And lets not forget the well loved "idiot bar" ....errrrr I mean "touch bar".To top that off, add a price that's more suitable for a downpayment on a car than a laptop computer.

...now lets look at the Mac Pro (also known as the "Fire Hydrant" or "Trash Can", to name a few). Once again...Jony Ive and style take over instead of functionality. What do we have? Essentially a computer that, instead of costing the equivalent of a downpayment for a car it can actually cost as much as a car, a barren lack of upgradability and for a system that used to be fully configurable now replaced with hardwired, outdated thunderbolt ports. What could possibly go wrong?

Both the Mac Mini and the iMac also suffer from the same short comings. Lack of configurability, lack of serviceability, and high costs for what you're really getting. Now top all of that off with operating systems that are so neglected and buggy that many are now calling "macOS" by it's more appropriate name, "crapOS".

Naaaahhhh....I can't see why they're not selling more.
 
Very misleading headline ignores PC sales trends as a whole.

As we see here, computer sales are on a downward trend as a whole across the entire industry. Everyone is at their lowest sales level in years. Not just Apple. Dell, HP, everyone.

587e5fd4ee14b651008b87d8-960-720.png
PC sales overall have risen in the last Quarter, your chart ends at 2016, this article is about Mac sales for the last Quarter, so they sold less Macs in the last Quarter while overall PC market increased sales over same time period. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/07/13/q2_2018_pc_shipments_rose/
 
Making the new Macbooks Pro have soldered RAM and SSD is like have the tires soldered to a car. So everytime you need to change tires, you need to replace the car...

Whomever designed this should be fired.

Beyond Ridiculous.
For a "consumer" machine, I think it is fine. But I do hope Apple reverses that trend with "Pro" machines.
 
Adding my 2 cents (which is the same as a lot of people have posted on here and worth about .000002 cents) - I've been an Apple advocate for decades. I know their percentage of laptop and desktop sales has dropped compared to mobile devices. So it makes business sense to focus on your strongest selling products. But they still are in part responsible for low computer sales - no updates, no-longer leading edge internals, high prices, abandoning the pro market and creative community, gimmicky costly touchbar, keyboard issues, no touchscreen alternatives. And seeing Apple reach an all-time stock high just now will just encourage them to keep them on the same discouraging track.

I needed a new laptop desperately. I do a fair amount of graphics work and use a PC at work and Mac at home. I still couldn't jump to PC and just added to that stock surge. I bit the bullet hard yesterday and ordered a new i9, 1 TB, 32GB 15" MBP. it cost me $1200 more than my previous 15" model in 2010. I used to be through-the-roof excited and pleased about getting a new Mac. Now I'm just trusting I will like it, in spite of the huge hole in my bank account. I don't like feeling that way.
If you TRULY use it for work, you should be able to expense it off on your Taxes. Problem solved!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bkkcanuck8
Why do you assume that the chips would be slow? Their A series chips have been the best in the mobile business. I'm a professional and I use an iPad as my main computer. With more power and room to breathe, you feel Apple is incapable of creating a high performance laptop chip? As long as they cater to developers and creatives, they'll keep the majority of their Mac user base in my eyes.

Why do you assume content creators would want to use an A series chip? You think the work YOU do is the most demanding on processors?
 
Imho I think the 2013 MBA is the best laptop Apple's made. Right size, all the ports I need and powerful enough to get the job done. Now if Apple made the new MBP with a couple more usb ports and went back to the old keyboard style I'd buy one in a heartbeat but alas I think my '13 MBA will be my last one for a very long time
 
It all started with the trashcan. Apple has lost it. (Computer that is, toys and phones are top notch!)
Wait! You forgot your one-button mouse meme!

Sheesh! The LISA had a Trashcan. Way to hold a GRUDGE!!! ;-)
[doublepost=1533150469][/doublepost]
I'd be willing to wager that inside three years Apple will say adios to Intel
I'd say 5, and it might not ever on its Pro models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
I honestly do wish the Apple would split into two. The idevice division and the Mac division. Get back to making top of the line hardware with great updates and reasonable (for Apple) prices. The idevice market has screwed over development of decent Mac hardware.

No it hasn’t. The latest MBPs are outstanding laptops, as is the iMac Pro desktop.

Apple designs products for its target markets, rather than the relatively tiny handful of people hanging out in tech forums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HenryDJP
Remember the Power PC? Motorola and IBM chips? Those two companies couldn't keep up with Intel. We went with Intel, and reaped huge benefits. Nowadays? Intel is stuck. That is the main reason for the pause in renewed Macs. When Intel gets down to 10 nanometer, and their chips don't fry eggs, there will be a new explosion of desktop and laptop. Or will Apple step in and somehow make a super-speed ARM chip? Stay tuned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
I'm hoping Apple comes on stage next year to say that they've been having "problems" keeping the Mac up-to-date because of third party suppliers and they will now be making their own CPUs and GPUs for new Macs going forward. Their chip team is incredible and the desktop computing industry overall hasn't been keeping pace in recent years. Otherwise arn might need to be looking into alternative domain names for MACrumors.com because this isn't sustainable.
Apple has some of the best engineers and designers in the world... but for some reason they can’t innovate without a new CPU? Nonsense. PCs are innovating. Just not the Macs.
 
Other, large companies do not appear to have a problem with rolling out updates on a regular basis. Why can't Apple?
[doublepost=1533147123][/doublepost]
If tariffs are the cause of higher Apple pricing then it stands to reason those same tariffs would cause higher pricing for other companies.
They don't really "update" anything, that's why.

Other companies don't use a solid block of aluminum for their laptop cases. Duh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.