Chromebooks have a greater marketshare than Macs but Apple's strategy appears to be ARM-based everything. Makes sense as a CPU that outperforms Intel costs $12.
Regardless of the reasons, today I read Apple stock reached an all time high. That means even with outdated products and lagging quality and innovation, they are still making a ton of money. I am beginning to feel some of that in part may be due to customer loyalty. I read comments from the cheerleaders here on these forums every day.
The only thing is if loyalty is driving profits, that could be short lived. If they don't provide products people actually want to buy they will lose customers, and new users might be turned off by the lack of innovation and updates and decide to try something else.
I notice you didn't say that Omnigraffle is inferior to Visio; just that people want Visio diagrams. Pretty lame unless they are supposed to EDIT the diagram. Just send them a PDF. Oh, and people whine on Windows-centric forums ALL the time about Visio. People want PowerPoint, too; even though Keynote is VASTLY superior.
Oh, and although I don't use Omnigraffle (and have only used Visio a few times), I thought there might be a way to get to/from Visio from Omnigraffle.
Well, there is:
https://discourse.omnigroup.com/t/e...ormat-readable-by-visio-or-excel-word/22273/2
Oh, and that took exactly 0.5 seconds searching on Google. You must not have looked very hard.
That's just like my Mac-using architect-consultant client/friend. He uses the (VASTLY Superior) VectorWorks for CAD. All of HIS Clients use that abominable AutoCAD. But since VectorWorks does a 100%-fidelty Import/Export from/to DXF/DWG Formats, it hardly matters. He Imports the AutoCAD file, reviews/makes his changes (or simply adds his "Approval"), then Exports it back out. It has been MANY years since there were any compatibility problems.
Oh, and a GOOD OS (like macOS) doesn't NEED to be "tamed". But you saying that just proves my point about Windows.
iPhone ASPs are up. Wearables are on a roll. Service revenue is strong. iPad sales have stabilised, leaving Mac sales as the sole sore thumb sticking out.
It is clear that customers’ willingness to pay higher prices for flagship iPhones has been grossly underestimated, while services and wearables will continue to boost revenues just nicely. There is nowhere for Apple to go but up.
Apple is on a roll, and they do make good products that people are willing to pay a premium for? Apple’s user base are not sheep that can be led around. Let’s give them more credit than that.
To the haters claiming that Apple is doomed, sorry, but it looks you will have to hide in your little holes for just a little longer.
I expect that to be more or less fixed for the last quarter of this calendar year. I have a strong feeling that after letting the Mac ecosystem languish for too long, they are really trying to make the hardware worth it again (for those that don't mind paying a little more for their hardware and getting macOS for freeiPhone ASPs are up. Wearables are on a roll. Service revenue is strong. iPad sales have stabilized, leaving Mac sales as the sole sore thumb sticking out.
Thats quite the rosy outlook you have there.
I wonder if there is a correlation between iPhones using flagship technology and selling like hotcakes, and outdated Mac's left festering in the abyss.
One new (I mean updated) MBP is not going to be enough to turn around a whole market especially when the MBP was released after the second quarter earnings had ended.
I know I won't be buying another MacBook Pro until they design something as solid as the last generation. Or even a Mac Pro until it is user upgradable and repairable like the last generation. See a pattern?
Those USB-C only butterfly keyboard MacBook Pros must be flying off the shelves /s
We all know what is happening here, Jobs cared about the personal computer and the user. Cook cares about money, and only money. iPhones, Emojis, simple apps, Subscription makes money. He is not "Thinking Different" like Jobs did, he is not out there to make things better, they are just another HP or Dell now milking the loyal MacOS users
"I am more than sure...". What evidence is this optimism based on?I am more than sure that they are building up to a big event in September where they refresh the entire Mac desktop and laptop line with new machines and at some point if not at the same time, introduce a Mac refresh program similar to the iPhone refresh program.
Sad, how things changed.
I think Apple devices appeal to users of all ages because they are easier to use. Some older people are quite tech savvy and can use any technology. My mum isn't one of those people she switched to the mac in 2011 and thank god because she was forever calling me about her windows machines and I'd be giving her tech support over the phone and sometimes would have to go and fix whatever the problem was. Since she got her mac she's not called me with any issues.I would be interested in seeing a survey based on the age of the Apple customer. Is it older folks, such as my self at 73, that are more likely to prefer desktop/laptop hardware as the hub of an ecosystem with mobile devices as handy synched peripherals? It was very easy for me to transition from desktop to laptop but to ditch Macs and go strictly iPad/iPhone would be an impossible leap. Perhaps my career, which was in mainframe/workstation IT, also contributes to my preferences. I have to know where my files are and I enjoy organizing them as I see fit. Finder is of huge importance for me. So is word processing and spreadsheets which require a decent keyboard and screen. Why lug around a big iPad? (I should also confess that my mobile phone is a 3G for emergencies; I am not a 24x7 consumer of the internet, nor do I put heavy demands on my AIRS 11 & 13.)
It is natural that Apple's business model would be focused on younger buyers and what they want for what they do.
To maximize shareholder value, Apple should start selling sugar water.
I looked into this as others have. Intel doesn't have an 8th gen 15W CPU with an appropriate GPU (Iris Plus) to run a Retina display.
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/26303525/
Sadly I think the entry level 13" MBA is the only laptop in their range that represents acceptable value (despite being so old).
Apple chose the AMD GPUs because they were the only ones that would let the MBP drive 2 5k Externals (plus the internal) Display.
Issues with Adapters/cable-swaps are a one-time thing, easily obtainable and inexpensive. Time marches on. In 5 years, you'll still have that MBP and all your USB-A peripherals will be dead and replaced with USB-C (Apple isn't the only one putting USB-C on computers, ya know...)
I have an SD slot on my 2012 MacBook Pro. I have used it exactly ONCE (just to see if it worked!).
There are a ZILLION $50 docks (or less) listed on Amazon that hook up with ONE measly USB-C cable, and give you your USB-A, HDMI, Gig Ethernet, and not only SD, but MicroSD and CF Card slots (something NO Mac has EVER had!). Those docks are sleek, about the size of a dollar-bill, and cheap enough that you can have one at your work and home. One cable, and ALL your peripherals are "plugged up" (oh, how I hate that term!). And you STILL have THREE identical ports FREE!
What's not to like about THAT?!?
80 Gb/sec I/O bandwidth (more than ANY other Laptop!), that you can configure in about a Googolplex variety of ways! You can expand that I/O up to FIFTY-THREE ***SIMULTANEOUS*** Ports! Sorry; but I'll take that over a couple of USB-A connectors ANY day!
Actually, they use AMD GPUs because AMD is willing to Apple to use them just for the hardware. Apple has full control over programming the driver stack for Metal etc. nVidia requires you to go through their driver stack etc.
The secondary issue was the last time Apple used nVidia in laptops, the chips did not live up to Apple's expectation with regards to reliability -- and they never came to an amicable agreement on nVidia reimbursing Apple for that issue.
So they're behind on releasing the 10nm chips. Are the A series chips at 10nm? IMO the success of the iPhone and iPad are not due to the A chip. But I'm welcome to see evidence to the contrary.
[doublepost=1533172204][/doublepost]
This has always puzzled me. IMO the OS takes a backseat to the applications that run on top of it. Yet there are Mac users who place the OS at the top of their requirements.
This is nothing to be proud of... I look around and see my Apple Ecosystem decreasing. Apple TV's are gone now, Sony smart TV with the same apps replaced them. Content is ruled in our house by Netflix, Youtube, Plex, Spotify. We love and enjoy Amazon Echo, Google Home, Sonos. Apple Airports were all just replaced with Linksys, Apple Monitor replaced with Dell.. only thing left is our iPhones, MacBooks. Something is wrong with their marketing plan...and ability to execute and come to market.
I see a pattern, it’s called “never gonna happen”. I am pretty sure that the “modular” mac pro that everyone is hoping for, will not be that modular or upgradeable and it makes sense - better pay full price for a new computer than Lower price for 1-2 components - it’s simply not profitable for Apple. Wait and you’ll see that this will be the case with the “modular” mac pro...
Apple is just coasting on the momentum of the Mac's popularity and cashing in, but it's clear they don't have a long-term vision for the Mac. The Mac is 34 years old this year; I don't think it will survive another decade.
THey have the ipad. Add a bt keyboard and you have the same concept. A non-computer computer where the customer are the merchandise.