Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I will wait a few months to see the rest of the lineup, but I would consider the new MacBook Pro to be a solid purchase option... you know the laptop computer with the most powerful expansion options built in (thunderbolt3/USB).

It is also the port that is used by none. I own nothing that uses USB-C, not even my own iPad, iPhone, and Macbook.

The USB-C is good, but its too early to fully implement it. Its like going HDMI only in 2001.

This is the PRO machine after all, they could go USB-C only with entry level stuff like Macbook Air.
 
It is also the port that is used by none. I own nothing that uses USB-C, not even my own iPad, iPhone, and Macbook.

The USB-C is good, but its too early to fully implement it. Its like going HDMI only in 2001.

This is the PRO machine after all, they could go USB-C only with entry level stuff like Macbook Air.
Got it, 'PRO' now means... the shape of the ports... using old technology... not new...
 
Personally I think they should have kept at least 1 USB-A style port (USB3), the Kensington lock slot, magsafe power and an ethernet port (extra points for a 10Gbit one).

The form factor was perfectly fine on the machines that had all those style ports.
 
Personally I think they should have kept at least 1 USB-A style port (USB3), the Kensington lock slot, magsafe power and an ethernet port (extra points for a 10Gbit one).

The form factor was perfectly fine on the machines that had all those style ports.

Except when you compare that model with the 2016-2018 MacBook Pro, it now feels like a boat anchor. Even if you did not mind the weight, it was bulky and a bit unwieldy and usually required two hands when moving anywhere with it. The 17-inch MacBook Pro certainly did.

I have a 15" Late 2011 and I very seldom use the DVD drive any more...I suppose I could replace it with an HDD or SSD once I find a definitive article that shows me what is safe to put in that bay. It is a good laptop, but it is not a small laptop - not now, at least.

I do not miss USB Type-A in the least. I found USB-C equivalent cables for everything that I need. Never used the Kensington lock slot and it seems like this has disappeared in general, not just from Apple products. MagSafe was fine, but Apple never released it, so that it might catch on as a standard and USB-C lets me have power/charging, data and video over a single cable now, which makes MagSafe feel like a waste of space and effort.

Leaving an Ethernet port on a laptop really limits how thin it can be all the way around. I see this constantly with Windows laptops, because the OEMs have almost no backbone to kill VGA dead once and for all. Apple had a tough decision to make when it created the original Retina MacBook Pro and most would agree it was the correct one. A few outliers still continue to cling to Firewire 800 and an Ethernet port.

Although I do not personally rely on a wired connection any more, I know that some do and they should be overjoyed with having USB-C as it allows them to pick whatever kind of 10GBps connection they want, something like the Akitio Thunder 3 10G, Thunder3 Dock Pro or Sonnet Technologies Solo 10G, among others. That's what makes the USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 ports so versatile. You may need 10Gbps, but I do not, most do not...having it natively on the MacBook Pro is going to need x2 lanes of PCIe 3.0, which could be used elsewhere. Or maybe you need it at work, but not at home if you use your MBP on a wireless network primarily.

USB Type-A cannot provide this amount of bandwidth and you cannot smart it up, at least with you USB-C, you can dumb it down if you need to hook up to an older USB peripheral, such as a printer or an audio interface, or even a serial port for a managed switch. YMMV.
 
Subjective criticism are not facts. Those products were not failures.
[doublepost=1533267227][/doublepost]

It is NOT subjective criticism. THey are facts.
I was waiting to buy the new Macbook refresh on 2016. When I saw the poor design I end up buying the older model. Not only that I think it had the most returns ever in an Apple line products. Many Pro users that end bought it they ended up returning it.

Furthermore, the quality was a disaster. The $5.99 keyboard feel, which actually Apple is having a class action lawsuit due to the problems and the battery issues as well.

The Mac Pro, was an overpriced failure. Why, because most of Pro users did not upgrade their machines to the new Mac Pro due incompatibility and bad design. So much so, that even today people are still looking for upgraded old Mac Pros (cheese grated). Either that or they are building Hackintoshes since they are tired of waiting for Apple to come up with a solution.
 
Last edited:
This suggests to me more that Apple have run up against the price gouging limit that the faithful are willing to pay for MacOS. To get the ball rolling again they probably need to rethink the line with MacBooks covering the 12 to 15 inch screen sizes and prices starting at $1,000-$1,300. This is unlikely to happen though as they’d rather sell everyone a touch bar pro at $1,800 and up 13” and $2,400 and up 15” so they can keep justifying that trillion dollar market cap...
 
Not sure why 256GB of flash storage running at 3.2GB/s Read and 2.2GB/s Write is such a joke to you, but the Dell XPS 15" equipped with Coffee Lake H-Series comes with the exact same size in an m.2 NVMe blade.

THe difference is that Dell is way much less money. In addition, Apple used to lead, and now is trailing. You are trying to compare a Mercedes with a Fiat. Or so people claim that Apple suppose to be so much better...

Some users prefer a smaller system disk, because all their storage is external. Some don't, and Apple gives customers the option to go all the way up to 4TB of flash storage.

I certainly know that we can carry a 4tb external HD. Which actually defeats the purpose of portability. 256gb internal in todays world when phones can have 256gb capability seems like a joke for Pro Computer.

You do not need a dock, but you might need to buy a few new cables. If you do not want to buy a Lightning to USB-C cable, which you can use with a 2016-2018 MacBook Pro's charger and an iOS device, then you can always sync your iPhone via wireless.

A new cable and new connector is not a poor design, it is called progress. Would you prefer that Apple had stuck with the 30-pin Dock Connector for the iPhone and iPad? Or never included a faster interface than Firewire 400 and USB 2.0 on its computers?

Is progress alienating your entire customer base and not be able to connect you own Apple products? That is extremely poor design. They just could have included one old USB port so people can still use all the external HDs and legacy USB Hardware including connecting their own iPhones and save themselves alot of issues... but they did not...

Whether having a socket for DRAM and SSD upgrades is more or less reliable can certainly be debated, Apple chose to solder them to the motherboard because then it has a reasonable chance in guaranteeing the minimum performance of what it sells to the user. With Dell and other manufacturers, who source from different vendors, even within the same product line, you might get a Toshiba SSD in one Dell XPS 15 or a Samsung SSD depending on what day of the week you order. It might be flexible, but it sure isn't a consistent experience.

It is NOT debatable. Again it is just an excuse for Apple to charge for more expensive repairs. It is ridiculous that a so called Pro Machine cannot be upgraded. Furthermore, having all components soldered has been proven to be more prone to data loss should any of the components fail.

Failure rates among PC manufacturers and Apple will tell us if Apple has made the right choice, but they have been doing this for a while with their various product lines, and I have not heard that Apple is having more returns due to fauly DRAM and flash storage.

We do not have to wait. Apple has been doing wrong choices for many years already. You can see that in the poor quality and design of the latest Macbooks. The 2016, had problems with battery, has a class action lawsuit for the keyboard problems (which they new and concealed) and they discounted all the adaptors to ridiculous prices due to the so bad PR it got on release due to the lack of ports and expandability.

and what is worse no one is fired...


Plenty of auto manufacturers would love to figure out how to seal the engine bay shut and never have to replace tires on a car, leaving us to replace the whole car once it dies. Volvo was the first to concept that, they will not be the last.

The TouchBar does not add $300 to the cost of the MBP, at least not the 15". The 2015 base started at $1999, but had no discrete GPU, which would have added at least $200 to the price. You can figure $200 maximum for the TouchBar, maybe less. Some people love it, some people hate it, but it is what it is. I will mark you down in the "Hate It" category.

Trying to force a useless touchbar on the entire line in order to overcharge the All the customers, it does not look like a good idea. That is why people are voting with their wallets and waiting to buy for the Macbooks without the touchbar.

Apple has not been selling less due to poor design. They have been selling less because they have 3 product lines that have not been upgraded in 3 years or more (Mac mini, MacBook Air and Mac Pro). Hopefully, along with an overdue upgrade for the iMac, these lines will be refreshed and Apple will provide some much overdue commitment to the Mac.

I would love Apple to disclose the return rates of the 2016 Macbook Pros... but they won't.
Not just the Macbook, but the entire Apple computer line up is so outdated that is beyond ridiculous.
What is worse, is that in the past 9 years, we have not seen any major computer innovation in any of Apple computers.
Apple only upgraded internal components. I think that is quite a long time for the customers to wait.

They even say clearly on their Ads.... What's a computer...??
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • 5110CD87-1EC8-461B-8FCF-1CC7320E5ACA.jpeg
    5110CD87-1EC8-461B-8FCF-1CC7320E5ACA.jpeg
    459.5 KB · Views: 81
THe difference is that Dell is way much less money. In addition, Apple used to lead, and now is trailing. You are trying to compare a Mercedes with a Fiat. Or so people claim that Apple suppose to be so much better...



I certainly know that we can carry a 4tb external HD. Which actually defeats the purpose of portability. 256gb internal in todays world when phones can have 256gb capability seems like a joke for Pro Computer.



Is progress alienating your entire customer base and not be able to connect you own Apple products? That is extremely poor design. They just could have included one old USB port so people can still use all the external HDs and legacy USB Hardware including connecting their own iPhones and save themselves alot of issues... but they did not...



It is NOT debatable. Again it is just an excuse for Apple to charge for more expensive repairs. It is ridiculous that a so called Pro Machine cannot be upgraded. Furthermore, having all components soldered has been proven to be more prone to data loss should any of the components fail.

Failure rates among PC manufacturers and Apple will tell us if Apple has made the right choice, but they have been doing this for a while with their various product lines, and I have not heard that Apple is having more returns due to fauly DRAM and flash storage.

We do not have to wait. Apple has been doing wrong choices for many years already. You can see that in the poor quality and design of the latest Macbooks. The 2016, had problems with battery, has a class action lawsuit for the keyboard problems (which they new and concealed) and they discounted all the adaptors to ridiculous prices due to the so bad PR it got on release due to the lack of ports and expandability.

and what is worse no one is fired...


Plenty of auto manufacturers would love to figure out how to seal the engine bay shut and never have to replace tires on a car, leaving us to replace the whole car once it dies. Volvo was the first to concept that, they will not be the last.

The TouchBar does not add $300 to the cost of the MBP, at least not the 15". The 2015 base started at $1999, but had no discrete GPU, which would have added at least $200 to the price. You can figure $200 maximum for the TouchBar, maybe less. Some people love it, some people hate it, but it is what it is. I will mark you down in the "Hate It" category.

Trying to force a useless touchbar on the entire line in order to overcharge the All the customers, it does not look like a good idea. That is why people are voting with their wallets and waiting to buy for the Macbooks without the touchbar.

Apple has not been selling less due to poor design. They have been selling less because they have 3 product lines that have not been upgraded in 3 years or more (Mac mini, MacBook Air and Mac Pro). Hopefully, along with an overdue upgrade for the iMac, these lines will be refreshed and Apple will provide some much overdue commitment to the Mac.

I would love Apple to disclose the return rates of the 2016 Macbook Pros... but they won't.
Not just the Macbook, but the entire Apple computer line up is so outdated that is beyond ridiculous.
What is worse, is that in the past 9 years, we have not seen any major computer innovation in any of Apple computers.
Apple only upgraded internal components. I think that is quite a long time for the customers to wait.

They even say clearly on their Ads.... What's a computer...??

If I buy a Dell XPS 13 (9370) with a Core i7-8550U, 8GB RAM, 256GB m.2 NVMe storage and upgrade to the UHD display they offer, I am at exactly the same cost as the base 13" MacBook Pro w/Touch Bar - $1799.00. So, no, the Dell is not "way much less money".

For the same amount of money, users have to decide on a couple of tradeoffs, would they rather have a faster CPU with the MacBook Pro or the higher resolution screen in the Dell. Make sure you decide how much DRAM you need with either one, because it is soldered to the motherboard on both the Dell XPS and the Apple MacBook Pro. The Dell lets you exchange out storage, should you want, so points go to Dell for that. All in all though, they are very similar, and so are their prices. Any premium laptop, which is what Apple sells, is going to cost more money, whether it is from Dell, HP, Lenovo or Apple.

Apple has the widest array of storage options compared to others when it comes to their laptops now. 128GB all the way up to 4TB. The upgrades are not all that expensive if you look at the cost of a top tier m.2 NVMe drive and not the New Egg Shell Shocker of the Day deals, which these Apple's are not. You cannot even buy a 4TB m.2 NVMe drive as far as I can find. If I sit down and seriously analyze what I have on my work MacBook Pro, 512GB is plenty for my usage. A post from another user said that he finally felt like he had breathing room now that he could upgrade to the 2TB tier on the 13" MacBook Pro. Maybe he has a valid reason, maybe not, maybe he never deletes anything. I personally do not need that much storage, especially not on a portable computer, too many things can happen. Again, YMMV.

Whether or not the iPhone can be purchsed with 256GB of storage is not germane to the issue. The iPad Pro has a 512GB version, but having that much storage does not make it any more or less "Pro" for the user who cannot get the work done on it that they need to do...64, 256 or 512GB, it is still just as useless.

Any time there is progress, people are going to get alienated, it is human nature. I remember when USB was introduced and I worked with people who were pissed off to no end, because USB was not nearly plug and play as everyone would like to think. And it was designed to replace the Serial, Parallel and PS/2 ports on a computer. Again, if you need to connect your iPhone to a USB-C port, there is a cable for that. If you need to connect it to a USB printer or USB audio interface, there is cable for that. If you need to connect it to your Kindle or Android phone, there is a cable for that. If you need to connect to a managed switch with a DB-9 serial port, there is a cable for that. Sure, not everything is going to get a cable or they have USB Type-A permanently attached, but there are adapters for that. Adapters are a fact of life for both PC and Mac users. I have an old Microsoft Office keyboard that I adored, but it was USB only and the computer I was using it with did not have USB, it had PS/2 ports, so I had to use an ADAPTER/DONGLE. My Kindle Fire tablet and my Surface RT have HDMI out, but it is mini-HDMI connector, so I had to buy a new cable or buy an adapter. I did not spend my days crapping on Amazon and Microsoft because they did not make it a full size HDMI port.

Yes, it is debatable, unless you have specific information (case studies, reports, et al.) that clearly point out that soldering on the memory and flash storage is inherently less reliable. I would argue that it is more reliable as Apple can do individual QA of the components while qualifying the boards before assembly into the enclosure. They could do the same with an m.2 socket or an SO-DIMM slot, but those require human hands to seat those components, which is another way for static electricity to be introduced into the system. After sale, you also have unknown variables when people decide to upgrade, including whether or not the person buys the right parts and knows how to install them correctly. I did have one Apple Genius tell me that people upgrading their DRAM themselves was the single largest failure point for Macs. Take it for what it is worth, it is one Genius at one store who told to me, so anecdotal and not gospel.

If you do not back up your data, you have no one to blame but yourself. Stuff breaks, no matter who makes it...Apple is not some guy in a top hat twirling his moustache waiting for your computer to break just so he can stick it to you.

Reliability of Apple's computers and your opinion that Apple has been making the wrong choices for years are not the same thing. Battery problems are not exclusive to Apple and are not limited to the 2016 MacBook Pro (can you say Samsung). While the keyboard does have issues (although, I have not had one single issue with mine), the problem has been magnified 100x by a certain segment of users on this forum who are upset with Apple about the design of the 2016-2018 MacBook Pros in general and latched on to the issue to try and prove what a horrible computer Apple made. Someone could literally find the cure for cancer using a 2016 MacBook Pro and there would be sneers of, "Bet he could have found it faster if he didn't have to use that s***y keyboard!" on this forum.

Again, while the Touch Bar might be useless to you, it is not useless to others. Apple made a decision that it was enough of an innovation that they included it in the entire MacBook Pro series. I would love to see a standalone keyboard with the Touch Bar, but I suspect that it would be around $200-$250 and I think Apple knows that the market for that is quite small at this time. Perhaps, Apple will introduce it and lower the cost of the MacBook Pro in the future.

The low sales for the quarter come from the fact that several of the product line need refreshes desperately (Mac mini, MacBook Air, MacBook and Mac Pro), along with the fact that there were no new Macs introduced during the quarter. Both the MacBook and MacBook Air are waiting on CPUs to be released by Intel (Amber Lake Y-series and Coffee/Whiskey Lake U-series with Iris Plus GPUs), the Mac Pro is 2019 and that leaves the 21.5" and 27" iMacs that will most likely get 9th-Gen Coffee Lake CPUs, skipping the 8th-Gen. Heck, even the iMac Pro might soon be updated to a 22-core Xeon if Intel has it ready when they release the 22-core version of the Core i9 X-Series.

Apple probably will not disclose anything to you or me. So what?

The entire Apple computer lineup is not outdated. The MacBook Pros all use the most recently released CPUs, the MacBook has the latest shipping CPUs from Intel, the iMac has Kaby Lake, which is hardly outdated or slow, just not the most recently released. The Mac mini, MacBook Air and the Mac Pro all need to be updated, and hopefully, they will be.

The personal computer is a mature product, I am not exactly sure what major innovations you are looking for from Apple, or anyone else for that matter.

Indeed, what is a computer? Your iPad, your iPhone, your Mac, your Watch? There is nothing wrong with emotional investment until it turns into entitlement and outrage, but I digress.
[doublepost=1533333173][/doublepost]
A 2014 model bought in 2015?
Don't be facetious, Apple update the iMac twice in 2015, just as I posted earlier. Nice try.
https://support.apple.com/en_US/specs/imac
 
Last edited:
Yeah but the 2016 MBP was using a "hardware" hack in order to do it; and it didn't do it very well.

Initially TB3 did not support DP 1.3 and above....but....



So pretty much any modern laptop with TB3 is going to be using the Titan Ridge chip.

Of course the desktop part crushes the laptop part. I will give you a big hint; the people asking for more GPU power don't care that it drains battery life; and the main reason is they want CUDA support for scientific stuff, and content creation.

FYI current consumption is the wrong term, what you mean is watts. And I am pretty sure that is what automatic GPU switching is for.
It seems like the Titan Ridge controller supports DP 1.4, but it is confusing as to whether that really means anything in a practical sense, yet.

As far as CUDA on AMD, there appears to be a solution through Ocelot and/or otoy:

https://code.google.com/archive/p/gpuocelot/

https://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/40199-otoy-allows-cuda-to-run-on-amd

Also, you need to learn this equation: P = I * E

Power (Watts) = I (Current in Amps) * E (Volts)

Or as my electronics teach taught me: "Power is as easy as PIE."

Often seen as:

P
-----
I E

So you can see the relationship, and easily "solve" for any of those values, if you know the other two.

So, Power and Current are inextricably related. Can't have Watts without Current. Sorry, you're simply wrong on this one.
[doublepost=1533336431][/doublepost]
I am pretty sure it could be done for under 10k.
You've never designed a consumer product in your life, have you?

$10k wouldn't pay for the PCB prototypes, let alone the packaging.

Do you really think the engineering on these could be done for < $10k? :

https://512pixels.net/2017/04/the-cheese-grater-mac-pro/

https://www.engadget.com/2013/12/23/apple-mac-pro-review-2013/
 
You didn't bother to read my findings.

Had you clicked on the link for the GPU comparison, you would have noticed the 8th Gen 15W iGPU gets beaten significantly in many tests by the 7th gen Iris Plus that's in the 2017 nTB MBP.

That's irrelevant. My point was that a lower class iGPU is able to drive a 4K display in addition to its own internal display. Intel's UHD 620 is capable albeit inferior to the Iris (Pro) options. Apple has choices, even if it comes with trade-offs. Apple could always add an Nvidia MX150, but we know Apple's stance on this....
 
Apple knows that demand for computers isn't going to get better. The general population is turning to mobile devices for everyday "computing" experience. Japan was the first country where something similar happened. In fact Japan went so far in that direction that computer literacy is incredibly low there. Anyway, Apple knows this is going to happen to the whole world, so they have little reason to focus on their mac computers.
 
That's irrelevant. My point was that a lower class iGPU is able to drive a 4K display in addition to its own internal display. Intel's UHD 620 is capable albeit inferior to the Iris (Pro) options. Apple has choices, even if it comes with trade-offs. Apple could always add an Nvidia MX150, but we know Apple's stance on this....
The question should be why didn’t Intel release an Iris Plus GPU variant of the 15w U-Series 8th-Gen (8250U, 8350U, 8550U, 8650U) when they first announced them back in August of last year? Apple has choices and they consistently choose the Iris series of iGPUs...many articles have been written highlighting the emphasis that Apple places on GPU performance. People can complain all they want that Apple could have used these CPUs, but then that means they truly do not understand where Apple comes from in making these decisions. What compromise Apple makes for the 13” MacBook will be interesting g to say the least.

NVIDIA will not see the inside of an Apple computer ever again, which does not bother me one bit. NVIDIA can shove off, keep on walking and not bother stopping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Apple knows that demand for computers isn't going to get better. The general population is turning to mobile devices for everyday "computing" experience. Japan was the first country where something similar happened. In fact Japan went so far in that direction that computer literacy is incredibly low there. Anyway, Apple knows this is going to happen to the whole world, so they have little reason to focus on their mac computers.
Yes is true 1000 dollar iphone x sell better then 1000 dollar imac, maybe 1000 vs 1 ratio. But if no application build by developer, iphone just a dump phone. Apple force developer to update latest library and who does run testing without iphone X emulator.So you need min 8GB ram and more much better. But, not just developer/programmer. Asset also need to be done by artist which might use logic x/final cut pro and so on. Believing apple just a phone company kinda bad but in reality it become a phone company..

If apple don't maintain quality other product, the margin share reduce maybe 5% around the world . Apple hardware is pretty rare anyway.
 
Except when you compare that model with the 2016-2018 MacBook Pro, it now feels like a boat anchor. Even if you did not mind the weight, it was bulky and a bit unwieldy and usually required two hands when moving anywhere with it. The 17-inch MacBook Pro certainly did.
.

Well the idea of the PRO machine is not to be light and thin, its supposed to be powerful and versatile and for work. If you don't want the bulk there is always the Macbook Air and Macbook. You can carry that with 2 fingers probably.
 
Apple Computer becomes Apple. Roots forgotten or just company and product evolution? iGadgets aren't born from Apple without standing on the shoulders of the Mac and its supporters—Apples foundation which has been cracking for years and it doesn't even look like they (Apple) care too much.

Not excited about the upcoming, already outdated 13" MacBook priced under $1000 (which means $999). You can predict it's going to have a lackluster entry model at 128Gb storage, MAYBE 8Gb RAM, A year-old i-5 chip w/uhd 620 graphics and FINALLY Retina display. Value? Nope.

I'm 43 and have been an Apple fan/supporter/customer since I was 15, but I swear if this new entry level MacBook starts over $899, I'm gone. Sticking with Apple forces you into a laptop/desktop if you prefer to or have to work with a mouse. I was looking into switching from Mac Mini to iPad Pro 12.9" and from Adobe to Affinity, but its looks like it can't be with an iPad unless you use your fingers or Apple Pen...meh. Shame on you Apple, don't force me to jump ship and swim for PC island.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iop
Well the idea of the PRO machine is not to be light and thin, its supposed to be powerful and versatile and for work. If you don't want the bulk there is always the Macbook Air and Macbook. You can carry that with 2 fingers probably.

What if the user wants both? A light yet powerful device which you can dock to a 5k display and e-gpu should extra horsepower be required. Seems like the current 15” MBP would represent the best (and arguably the worst) of both worlds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
Apple Computer becomes Apple. Roots forgotten or just company and product evolution? iGadgets aren't born from Apple without standing on the shoulders of the Mac and its supporters—Apples foundation which has been cracking for years and it doesn't even look like they (Apple) care too much.

Not excited about the upcoming, already outdated 13" MacBook priced under $1000 (which means $999). You can predict it's going to have a lackluster entry model at 128Gb storage, MAYBE 8Gb RAM, A year-old i-5 chip w/uhd 620 graphics and FINALLY Retina display. Value? Nope.

I'm 43 and have been an Apple fan/supporter/customer since I was 15, but I swear if this new entry level MacBook starts over $899, I'm gone. Sticking with Apple forces you into a laptop/desktop if you prefer to or have to work with a mouse. I was looking into switching from Mac Mini to iPad Pro 12.9" and from Adobe to Affinity, but its looks like it can't be with an iPad unless you use your fingers or Apple Pen...meh. Shame on you Apple, don't force me to jump ship and swim for PC island.
no wrong jumping ship. But windows os 10 pretty same bad nowdays.The most i like is window server 2008r2,no need re-install. The introduction with tablet era making all focus on netbook and tablet. The term workstation is rare exist and become server edition. Linux much nicer this days, osx just alternative. But mindset about keyboard is worst mine transition between windows and mac...
 
The question should be why didn’t Intel release an Iris Plus GPU variant of the 15w U-Series 8th-Gen (8250U, 8350U, 8550U, 8650U) when they first announced them back in August of last year? Apple has choices and they consistently choose the Iris series of iGPUs...many articles have been written highlighting the emphasis that Apple places on GPU performance. People can complain all they want that Apple could have used these CPUs, but then that means they truly do not understand where Apple comes from in making these decisions. What compromise Apple makes for the 13” MacBook will be interesting g to say the least.

NVIDIA will not see the inside of an Apple computer ever again, which does not bother me one bit. NVIDIA can shove off, keep on walking and not bother stopping.

It would be great if Intel paired Iris Pro with a 15W CPU, but this has never been part of their product lineup. It has always been paired with 28W CPUs. I wonder if this is simply a case of creating artificial market segmentation or if there is another reason?

Either way, a 15W U-series paired with Iris Pro is likely only a dream.
 
Also, you need to learn this equation: P = I * E

Power (Watts) = I (Current in Amps) * E (Volts)

Or as my electronics teach taught me: "Power is as easy as PIE."

Often seen as:

P
-----
I E
When did voltage start using the 'E' symbol? It was always a 'V' when i was at school/uni.

Power is as easy as PIV doesn't sound as good though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Also, you need to learn this equation: P = I * E

Power (Watts) = I (Current in Amps) * E (Volts)

Or as my electronics teach taught me: "Power is as easy as PIE."

Often seen as:

P
-----
I E

So you can see the relationship, and easily "solve" for any of those values, if you know the other two.

So, Power and Current are inextricably related. Can't have Watts without Current. Sorry, you're simply wrong on this one.

Clap clap for you. Before you try to school someone maybe you should find out their background a bit more. I was an ET in the Navy for 4 years, so I ****ing know that formula.

Nobody in the world says "currents" when describing how much power something uses.
[doublepost=1533391488][/doublepost]
When did voltage start using the 'E' symbol? It was always a 'V' when i was at school/uni.

Power is as easy as PIV doesn't sound as good though!

Voltage was represented by "E" in Navy ET School.
[doublepost=1533391936][/doublepost]
Apple Computer becomes Apple. Roots forgotten or just company and product evolution? iGadgets aren't born from Apple without standing on the shoulders of the Mac and its supporters—Apples foundation which has been cracking for years and it doesn't even look like they (Apple) care too much.

Not excited about the upcoming, already outdated 13" MacBook priced under $1000 (which means $999). You can predict it's going to have a lackluster entry model at 128Gb storage, MAYBE 8Gb RAM, A year-old i-5 chip w/uhd 620 graphics and FINALLY Retina display. Value? Nope.

I'm 43 and have been an Apple fan/supporter/customer since I was 15, but I swear if this new entry level MacBook starts over $899, I'm gone. Sticking with Apple forces you into a laptop/desktop if you prefer to or have to work with a mouse. I was looking into switching from Mac Mini to iPad Pro 12.9" and from Adobe to Affinity, but its looks like it can't be with an iPad unless you use your fingers or Apple Pen...meh. Shame on you Apple, don't force me to jump ship and swim for PC island.

Unfortunately you will be back faster than you think. I tried living Windows10 only and it lasted about 2 weeks; it was an interesting experiment due to my hackintosh being bricked (yes they are more fun to update sometimes). But I quickly got it back working and here we sit. Honestly OS X is the reason we want Macs.

Depending on what Apple does in regards to the vaporware MacPro or possible MacMini update, I will either go with one of those or just build another Hack with updated kit once Mojave is released.
[doublepost=1533392396][/doublepost]
You've never designed a consumer product in your life, have you?

$10k wouldn't pay for the PCB prototypes, let alone the packaging.

Do you really think the engineering on these could be done for < $10k? :

https://512pixels.net/2017/04/the-cheese-grater-mac-pro/

https://www.engadget.com/2013/12/23/apple-mac-pro-review-2013/

Really? The only reason Apple designs PCBs is so they can shove custom silicon on it or put it in some wildly designed enclosure that they feel is "revolutionary." Apple could just as easy use a motherboard from Gigabit or Asus; and design a case that works with those. But they will not because that would mean they would have to make it work without some "custom" silicon telling OS X it is a genuine Mac.

Intel does all the work designing the CPU and Platform Controller Hub.

Of course all of this will become a moot point if Apple decides to ditch Intel in favor of A-something chips designed for desktop/laptop power envelopes.

The pure fact that Hackintosh PCs exist and work proves my point.
 
It would be great if Intel paired Iris Pro with a 15W CPU, but this has never been part of their product lineup. It has always been paired with 28W CPUs. I wonder if this is simply a case of creating artificial market segmentation or if there is another reason?

Either way, a 15W U-series paired with Iris Pro is likely only a dream.
If I may offer a slight correction, in my OP, I referenced the Iris Plus, not the Iris Pro. Iris Pro on a 15w CPU would be interesting, but the time for that kind of experiment has passed, I am afraid.

To answer your question, the Iris Pro was never well received by PC OEMs, who are looking to cut costs whenever and wherever they can. Evidence of this can be seen in the plethora of Intel Z170 chipset motherboards that were released containing Thunderbolt 3. Gigabyte had seven motherboards that featured Thunderbolt 3. Asus had 2 or 3, IIRC. I do not know about ASRock and MSI, unfortunately. Now look at the number of Z370 chipset motherboards containing Thunderbolt 3...ZERO. Intel must have given away the Alpine Ridge controller, to try and spur adoption by Windows users, but it just did not take off. Instead, ASMedia took over the USB 3.1 controller market and Thunderbolt 3 is relegated to an add-in card.

I also do not think it is simply a case of creating artificial markets, it was prodding from Apple and a bit of a passion project for Intel’s GPU engineers that gave us the Iris Pro GPU. This article on Anandtech from 2013 is a great read - https://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested

Intel is rumored to be refreshing the 8xxxU CPUs soon - https://wccftech.com/intel-whiskey-lake-u-8th-gen-core-i7-8565u-core-i5-8265u-cpu-leak/ - but this article mentions nothing about these containing Iris Plus GPUs or even mentions a variant (most likely called 8665U and 8365U) that would contain Iris Plus. Given that Apple chose not to use Iris 580-equipped H-Series CPUs for the 2016 MacBook Pro, Intel basically ceasing development on the Iris GPU line in favor of UHD GPUs, on package Vega GPUs (G-Series) and its soon to be launched discrete GPUs - https://www.anandtech.com/show/1201...ete-gpus-hires-raja-koduri-as-chief-architect - this leaves Apple in a tricky place as they really need a true successor to the MacBook Air.

Why, when they seem to not care about Macs any more? Well, unless they release Xcode for the iPad (impractical) or Windows (unlikely, I hope), they need a constant stream of new developers to continue the iOS hit parade and in turn those kids/students/people starting a new career need a decent Mac to help them get their feet wet. The 12” MacBook is not that computer or Apple would have killed the MacBook Air in 2015 or 2016 or 2017, instead of that pitiful 200MHz upgrade at WWDC 2017. Perhaps, Intel’s UHD 620 GPU is fast enough and an Iris Plus just will not be part of the equation. If the HD Graphics 6000 in the Core i5-5250U, i5-5350U and i7-5650U was good enough for the 2015 MacBook Air, perhaps Apple simply wanted to wait for Whiskey Lake. What this tells me is that Apple probably decided not too long ago (late 2017, is my guess) that they need to reverse course and actually replace the MacBook Air, probably at an October event. I guess we will see fairly soon.

Last thing, if there are no more Iris Plus GPUs planned for the 15w U-Series, this explains why Apple did not upgrade the 13” nTB MacBook Pro and it will die on the vine, so to speak. No way they would put UHD graphics in it, even Apple is not that cheap. Pretty sure...like 90% sure. LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Val-kyrie
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.