If all employees had to abide by the same in person work directive before the Pandemic, how is this new work directive which seems to be more flexible (depending on job task) burdensome?I feel like it was clear the employees say it is burdensome.
If an employee has suffered a mental or physical crisis during his or her required remote work for Apple, I think Apple should and will make the proper accommodations for said people. Barring that exception, I see no reason why the few employees who wrote the letter shouldn't be abiding by the new directive like everyone else.