Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why doesn't Apple utilize air tags inside the products when using this service? It will minimize left and in the end it will cost more to replace or even get into a legal battle down the road.

Activation-lock it to the customer's account before it gets shipped, that would be cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Somian
Why doesn't Apple utilize air tags inside the products when using this service? It will minimize left and in the end it will cost more to replace or even get into a legal battle down the road.
Or Apple could just require a signature and an ID check for any item over a certain amount. Right now, they can mark it delivered without even getting a signature which is absurd.
 
Sooner or later someone's going to try to activate the devices, right? The serial numbers should be on the invoice. So Apple will be able to see where they went.
 
I have used this service once (Postmates era) for AirPods max, went without a hitch. Now though? Never. Not worth the headache.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
"police departments in some jurisdictions refuse to investigate petty theft."

What you want is what you gets. ;)))
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Sooner or later someone's going to try to activate the devices, right? The serial numbers should be on the invoice. So Apple will be able to see where they went.
I absolutely won’t use any gig-economy delivery service. Uber, Lyft, DoorDash… I don’t trust any of them. They are overly expensive, and you’re trusting your driver not to cause an issue. I’d rather just pay a little extra for overnight shipping.

Hopefully the guy can just do a chargeback on his purchase.
It's really simple. In Poland, when I order something and want to pick it up, I have to enter the SMS code that the company sends me.
If the driver does not know the code, he cannot lie that he gave the goods to the customer. It's child's play.
 
Then the police would happily take a report for documentation purposes. Apple made the right decision. Sometimes it’s just obvious to most of us.
Well unfortunately what's 'obvious to most of us' often results in witch hunts and mobs attacking innocent people. We prefer to work on a system of evidence in civilised society. I'm not attacking Apple for a change, because they probably really do need a police report to evidence the claim. But I am attacking this standard of evidence you have for 'obvious' before you start potentially libelling people. You have no idea what did or didn't happen, and I think what he's saying is perfectly believable - or at least there's no evidence to call him a liar. Using pure reason, given that he's gone public with his story and attracted media attention, the police could very quickly shut him down and given he would be engaged in fraud arrest him, so I tend to believe him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 00sjsl
In Ca it is civil, so file small claims against all involved companies and let the Judge or more likely, the Pro Tem, decide who is liable. Judges in small claims love to let the plaintiff win because they vote, and Pro Tems are lawyers wanting to become judge. And down the line when they want to run for different office, these peeps will be more inclined to vote for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nonmacuser2023
I tried same day delivery once. It was delivered by Uber.
One thing I did not like was the Uber driver could clearly see what I ordered.
Since an Apple Store receives the order, they just pack it in a a bag and send it for delivery.
Not really a safe way to deliver.
He should have just went and bought it himself. Those delivery services are too unreliable. Hopefully he can get his money back or take both companies to court and get a sweet payout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flightcrew2
How this usually goes:

Apple screws over customer
Customer makes a big deal about it online
Apple makes it right with the customer
Apple looks bad

If Apple just skipped straight to the making it right with the customer part, they wouldn’t have to look bad online. But for some reason they keep shooting themselves in the foot. Sure the $2000 isn’t worth the huge PR problem this causes for a company that rakes in untold billions per year.

I’d be pissed too if someone stole $2000+ worth of stuff from me and I wouldn’t take it laying down. And since when is $2000 petty? That seems major to me but I’m not a fancy boy. Inflation is crazy.
I feel both Apple And Uber are in the wrong here. Hope they both get sued for a tidy sum.
 
Perhaps but it also sounds exactly like what a fraud attempt would sound like it. When you're gonna try to defraud Apple you buy a couple of expensive things at once, not just one.

Oh I definitely agree it sounds shady. The real problem is that there was no system in place that can actually prove whether it’s fraud or not. No signature, no gps tracking, no investigation by Apple or Uber and apparently the police don’t care either.

It’s the perfect storm for fraud so why even offer it except to shift delivery expenses and liability onto Uber and the customer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
But did the customer pick same day? Those usually come Uber or Postmates etc... Unless it was like my Best Buy order. Saturday I picked 2day, but they did it same day for free. Then ordered early Sunday.

I believe the merch should be delivered the same day, but I cannot say for sure.
The wording everywhere implies so.
However, it never reached the customer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
There’s absolutely a recourse: File a dispute with your credit card.

Since trying to issue a chargeback will get you banned, it might be better to actually file a lawsuit.

They could also try to issue a chargeback and then threaten to sue Apple if they are banned (assuming they are right), but going for a straight lawsuit and asking for a compensation might make more sense.
 
If you have more than $2k to by Apple products, then you also have a car to drive and get it... WHO IN THE WORLD would trust an UBER Driver? Jeeeezz

Not necessarily. Sometimes an Apple store is not available nearby.
If Apple screwed up, then it's them who are to blame. The person who had their phone stolen is the victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Uber Eats?

Apple's responsibility. So easy to get photo proof of delivery for each and every delivery by apparently non-insured delivery service.
 
Uber should really implement a policy where it is required to have a customer's signature on orders above $50.00. How UPS does it with UPS Signature Required.
Signature seems like such a low-security method. You know that every driver has a phone with them - how about taking a picture of the person that accepted the package? THAT would be true verification!
 
I was molested/sexually harassed by a gay driver and Uber did absolutely nothing about it. If they don’t have concern for the safety of passengers, I don’t see why they’d much care about your iPhone delivery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ac1d 8urn
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.