I will never forget the time when I was driving with new, clunky snow boots on, and as I took my foot off the gas to hit the break, my boot (size 13 + snow boot girth) got wedged in between the gas and the brake pedal, and I could not immediately unlodge it. In fact, as I was trying to unlodge it, my big boot hit the gas briefly and the vehicle accelerated before I was able to break free. I had to swerve not to hit another car. It was a flook, never happened before, but it was a terrifying few seconds - and sometimes, that's all it takes.
If his foot got stuck on the accelerator it means he couldnt get to the brake, no skid marks would be seen.I know the area well including that shopping area. He may have had 500' to get up to speed; maybe 600 if he came from behind the store across the parking lot from apple. If not deliberate, where are the skid marks from attempted braking? Did those fail as well?
Interesting since the vast majority of fault for auto accidents of any type is attributed to "youngsters" 35 and younger.Welp, guessing an oldster is about to lose his/her license.
....or an oldster who shouldn't be driving any more. Happens a lot around here.
It still doesn't explain the direction the SUV traveled?If his foot got stuck on the accelerator it means he couldnt get to the brake, no skid marks would be seen.
You don’t need 500’ to build up enough speed to kill someone. An accident like this happened a couple of miles away from me in a tiny car park with about 30 spaces and no run up. Older driver had an episode got confused, hit the accelerator thinking it was the brake, killed 2 people. The thing about hitting the pedals that way is that when instinct makes you hit the brake hard, you actually accelerate aggressively.I know the area well including that shopping area. He may have had 500' to get up to speed; maybe 600 if he came from behind the store across the parking lot from apple. If not deliberate, where are the skid marks from attempted braking? Did those fail as well?
Surely that would be easily explained by him swerving to avoid pedestrians or other traffic?Look at the below image, how did a SUV hitting the accelerator go from the right side of the lane going thru the parking lot, into the Apple store, that direction is considerable off to the left?
He should have in all rights drove into Burtons which is right in from of the lane you would utilize? That kinda implies he had lost control of the SUV before he got close to the Apple Store.
![]()
The recall only affected cars made roughly 10 years before this one was built.The vehicle is a 2019 model 4Runner. Those are made in Japan. Did the accelerator issue affect Japan made vehicles also or only US made.
There are so. Many. Ways. To stop a vehicle besides the brake pedal. How about shifting out of the drive gear? Or shutting it off?
I get that people panic, but he truth is that this guy has DUIs on his record. I don't believe for a second that his foot got stuck.
Look at how angled the SUV position is after going through the plate glass. The store was off to the left somewhat not in line with the street approaching Burtons. Yes he could have swerved at the last couple of seconds, but he made it a lot worse.Surely that would be easily explained by him swerving to avoid pedestrians or other traffic?
Everybody has an opinion here, but facts would be a great thing when leveling serious accusations against someone.There are so. Many. Ways. To stop a vehicle besides the brake pedal. How about shifting out of the drive gear? Or shutting it off?
I get that people panic, but he truth is that this guy has DUIs on his record. I don't believe for a second that his foot got stuck.
Yeah that's the case here. Don't be disappointed when the state police release their findings.You don’t need 500’ to build up enough speed to kill someone. An accident like this happened a couple of miles away from me in a tiny car park with about 30 spaces and no run up. Older driver had an episode got confused, hit the accelerator thinking it was the brake, killed 2 people. The thing about hitting the pedals that way is that when instinct makes you hit the brake hard, you actually accelerate aggressively.
That means they can not establish nefarious intent and charged him with what seems to be the correct charges based on what I am reading in most places.What the driver is charged with (reckless homicide with motor
Vehicle), seems pretty light given what he did, 1 person dead, 20 injured.
wait for the trial when video evidence is made public. I can guarantee everyone deflecting the blame away from him will be disappointed.You don’t need 500’ to build up enough speed to kill someone. An accident like this happened a couple of miles away from me in a tiny car park with about 30 spaces and no run up. Older driver had an episode got confused, hit the accelerator thinking it was the brake, killed 2 people. The thing about hitting the pedals that way is that when instinct makes you hit the brake hard, you actually accelerate aggressively.
The first SUV into Apple Store incident I’m aware of happened in Temecula in 2012.This store has been there since 2006, so who would have ever thought an event like this would occur. The other thing is the store was clearly using thick security glass.
People have two feet. One time mine got stuck so I hit the brake with my left while I got it unstuck. And there is also an ebrake. I don't think some cars would let you shift since they don't let you in reverse going too fast. There needs to be a way on cars to instantly drop to neutral. Would rather have a blown engine than people dieIf his foot got stuck on the accelerator it means he couldnt get to the brake, no skid marks would be seen.
I'm not sure why you say that. The people "deflecting blame" are simply saying that we don't actually know what happened yet, and just discussing possibilities. Everything from intentional to the "foot got stuck" option is quite possible at this point based on the information available to the public. I'm not deflecting anything, but I'll wait to blame the driver for anything more than an accident until I see evidence.wait for the trial when video evidence is made public. I can guarantee everyone deflecting the blame away from him will be disappointed.
I’m sorry I don’t understand your insistence that a person who has lost control of their car would only drive in a straight line directly into a brick wall. I don’t know where that’s coming from at all. He doesn’t claim to have been unconscious or unable to steer, so why is the straight line his only option?Look at how angled the SUV position is after going through the plate glass. The store was off to the left somewhat not in line with the street approaching Burtons. Yes he could have swerved at the last couple of seconds, but he made it a lot worse.
I certainly will be disappointed if it turns out a guy drove at a store full of people on purpose. Who wouldn’t be? But I won’t regret keeping an open mind and questioning truthy logic, and anonymous sources.wait for the trial when video evidence is made public. I can guarantee everyone deflecting the blame away from him will be disappointed.
Yep... Happens fairly often here in the St. Louis area. Older person tries to park in one of those spaces with lines painted for them across the front of a shop. Accidentally hits accelerator instead of brake and drives through the front window/entrance.You don’t need 500’ to build up enough speed to kill someone. An accident like this happened a couple of miles away from me in a tiny car park with about 30 spaces and no run up. Older driver had an episode got confused, hit the accelerator thinking it was the brake, killed 2 people. The thing about hitting the pedals that way is that when instinct makes you hit the brake hard, you actually accelerate aggressively.
Please keep an open mind especially when the state police release their findings, video is released and the DA can’t substantiate their claims.I’m sorry I don’t understand your insistence that a person who has lost control of their car would only drive in a straight line directly into a brick wall. I don’t know where that’s coming from at all. He doesn’t claim to have been unconscious or unable to steer, so why is the straight line his only option?
I certainly will be disappointed if it turns out a guy drove at a store full of people on purpose. Who wouldn’t be? But I won’t regret keeping an open mind and questioning truthy logic, and anonymous sources.
You won’t have to wait long.I'm not sure why you say that. The people "deflecting blame" are simply saying that we don't actually know what happened yet, and just discussing possibilities. Everything from intentional to the "foot got stuck" option is quite possible at this point based on the information available to the public. I'm not deflecting anything, but I'll wait to blame the driver for anything more than an accident until I see evidence.
There were signs everywhere when we went to Philly stating the massive increase of death chance for a pedestrian hit by a car going 35 vs 25Yep... Happens fairly often here in the St. Louis area. Older person tries to park in one of those spaces with lines painted for them across the front of a shop. Accidentally hits accelerator instead of brake and drives through the front window/entrance.
Yep... Happens fairly often here in the St. Louis area. Older person tries to park in one of those spaces with lines painted for them across the front of a shop. Accidentally hits accelerator instead of brake and drives through the front window/entrance.