This would probably hold up as prior art in a court in the US or Europe. That said, this is China, so don’t expect the courts there to be sympathetic.Apple has been using the logo way longer than that. Check out this screenshot of MacOS 10.0, from 2001 (notice the "Applications" icon):
![]()
The recent change is a natural evolution of that design. There's no way they should win.
EDIT: And yes, that is Internet Explorer.
Lol what a joke. They’re gonna lose tho because it’s in china
When Apple released the updated App Store as part of iOS 11, the App Store logo got an overhaul. Instead of an "A" made from a pencil, a paintbrush, and a ruler, Apple designed a simpler "A" that looks like it's constructed from popsicle sticks.
As it turns out, Apple's App Store logo bears a resemblance to the logo used by a Chinese clothing brand named KON, and now KON is suing Apple.
![]()
According to Phone Radar (via The Verge), KON believes Apple's new logo is a violation of Chinese copyright law. KON is a brand that's been around since 2009, and as The Verge discovered, Baidu Baike, the Chinese equivalent of Wikipedia, says the KON brand was inspired by music like the Sex Pistols, with the logo meant to represent three skeleton bones symbolizing power over death.
![]()
KON wants Apple to publicly apologize for using its logo, stop selling devices using the current App Store logo, and pay compensation for economic loss.
The Beijing People's Court has accepted the case and should make a ruling over the course of the next couple of weeks.
Apple in 2016 lost a similar case involving the "IPHONE" trademark that was in use by Chinese leather goods manufacturer Xintong Tiandi Technology. In that case, Apple was aiming to protect its iPhone trademark to prevent Xintong Tiandi from using the iPhone name for its cases, but the Chinese courts ruled against Apple.
Article Link: Apple Sued for App Store Logo's Resemblance to Chinese Clothing Brand Logo
How aggressively did they pursue this though? It's probably somewhat like Disney, they don't like having to send C&D's to daycares unlawfully using their trademarks, but they can't risk dilution and invalidation of the mark, so they defend it vigourously.This is actually funny. After seeing Apple suing for using apple in logo / name etc. I'm from Poland and few years ago they sued the grecery compagny with web site a.pl (pl is polish internet extension) for the use of this logo
![]()
as similar to apple
Then again considering Sir Jony Ive ripped off most of his ideas from Dieter Rams this theft isn't surprising.
What was it his mentor once said? Good artists copy, great artists' steal
The tough part is that Apple, Disney, et. al., have seen too many trademarks get diluted and invalidated through lack of vigourous defence. IIRC, Disney is on record stating they only go after daycares and other "nice" uses because of the fear of invalidation. I'm sure Apple is similar.Heh. That has never stopped Apple from trying to intimidate anyone else using an apple in their logo... no matter how different their market is.
View attachment 742785
Like going after that little street corner cafe. And even dumber, after The Big Apple itself (NYC) over a recycling campaign.
This is such a simple design and so obvious I highly doubt anybody was copying. I'm pretty sure I came up with something similar when I was a kid.
It's just 3 overlapping lines... I wonder what's the simplest thing someone could claim as a unique design?
P.S. I also think these guys have a strong case to sue the ancient Egyptians...
![]()
Can't beat this one
![]()
Off topic, but I just want China to vanish off the face of the earth asap.
Apple has been using the logo way longer than that. Check out this screenshot of MacOS 10.0, from 2001 (notice the "Applications" icon):
![]()
The recent change is a natural evolution of that design. There's no way they should win.
EDIT: And yes, that is Internet Explorer.
Apple has been using the logo way longer than that.
It was a joke... Happy Christmas by the way.Pictures in your comment are completely irrelevant/different.
It has nothing to do with fanboys. I guess the irony of the situation is flying right over your head.The fanboyism is flowing in this thread. Dear lord. This is pretty open and shut. Not sure how much economic loss is viable, but it's effectively the same logo....Apple will settle for a reasonable amount and should change the logo back. Pretty cut and dry.