What annoys me about this is that a year ago Steve Jobs said that he didn't see much point in netbooks or tablets and that aside from browsing the Internet in the bathroom, he didn't see the point of them. This is pretty much all they have given us, yet Apple are now touting this as the holy grail of electronics devices.
They haven't given us much more than a large iPod Touch. Granted I'm sure it would be nice to read ebooks on, but I'd much rather pay twice as much and get some proper next generation features. I was hoping to be able to use it as an input device for my Mac, like the Wacom Cintiq. Or use it as a universal remote to control IR devices around my office and home. Use it as a large format GPS device and video chat to loved ones when away from home.
Why on earth can't we multitask applications with this if the processor is 'a screamer'? Working with iWork, especially Pages and Keynotes without the ability to flick between the app and the web, or email, or image editor etc seems a little daft.
It pains me to say this, but the MS Courier concept video looks far more appealing than the iPad. Granted that's only a concept, but I really had high hopes for the iPad and I would have been willing to pay/wait in line for it should Apple deliver.
I don't need yet another device to duplicate my emails on! I have my Mac, my portable Mac and my iPhone!
At best I can see my buying one of these for the kids to watch films on in the car! But then what will the iPod Touches be used for?
