I am sure Apple knows the best way to manage this. They'll still continue to have great quarters. It's been the same doom and gloom for years, just hasn't happened.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Taking 'Cautious Approach' to iPhone Assembly This Year, Lowering Component Orders by 20%
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I kept my iPhone 5 until last year(5yrs), when I bought the iPhone 8 plus. I have no intention of replacing this phone for at least 5 years(2022), and only if Apple get rid of that stupid notch. I have a 2014 27" iMac, and have no intention of getting another one until Apple give me what I want. A 30", or 32" iMac with a Pro 34" widescreen model. I also want my 17" laptop again. I bought three of them. I will not buy that toy 15" laptop. Apple's range of software and hardware is very boring, zero true updates. To wait until 2019 for the Mac Pro is as bad joke. There are some great widescreen 4K monitors available now Apple. Apple is so behind the trend, so far behind, so deaf to what customers want, slow, slow product updates, unless you want a watch strap every year, or Fisher Price/Crayola coloured headphones, or yet another phone. Apple only updates the iPhone, every year or two. Why does Apple employ so many people, to produce so little?
Or, or, just bear with me here... they've learned all too well. They've learned to manipulate the market so well that even lay people can tell what time of year it is based on analyst predictions.
Analyst aren't fans. They don't care whether Apple does well or not. They just care if Apple can make them money.
Are you referring to the latest version of Android? Oh wait there event two months ago only featured things Apple did last year, but it was new to them I guess. There a great YouTube video showing off the coolest 100 new or updated features for IOS 12. Many times Apples updates aren’t fresh to the public in recent years because of all the leaks months or sometimes years in advance to them fully developing the tech to make it work on the level they require. Remember the IPad was really initially shelved to do the iPod because the touch screen technology did not exist to realize their vision.
Sadly, I think you are right. I would like to think that after the last round of negative iPhone news was proven to be dead wrong, people would learn to be a little wiser and more skeptical of any news that spreads doom and gloom about Apple, but I guess there’s just something about Apple which draws the haters and the naysayers out of the woodwork.
All I can say is - bring it on (cracks knuckles).
Leopard was also the last version of OSX to support both PowerPC and x86. A lot of what made Leopard RAM hungry and have a large footprint was that it essentially had two sets of libraries for everything - one for each architecture. There were apps back then that would strip one or the other from Leopard, that really reduced it's size and RAM dependence. For example, even today, you can find unofficial installs of Leopard that are x86-only or PowerPC-only.
Snow Leopard was the first version of OSX that was x86-only. While Apple did focus on stability and all, a lot of those gains were simply stripping out the legacy PowerPC stuff.
It will be interesting to see if Apple decides to leverage the most loyal of their customer base by offering to wave their final 1-2 payment(s) if they preordered the X last October.
From a marketing standpoint alone it's a cheap way to nudge your most loyal customers a bit more to buy your next newest thing. Think of it like this IF someone with an X is interested in upgrading, but finds out they have 2 months of payments left, they may decide to hold onto their X for 2 months until they upgrade. Fine you'll get the sale 2 months from now right - it doesn't matter.
Not exactly. After two months "newness" of the new model has faded, the need to own it first isn't there anymore, and now this person says "yah know what I'll keep my X until next year and upgrade then". So you've lost a sale of an iPhone for ~$100.
That's not it though, it could get even worse for you because next year rolls around and this person now realizes "hey my iPhone X may be 2 years old, but Apple makes really solid products maybe I'll hold onto it for another year and ditch the monthly payment entirely, afterall I didn't miss out on much last year anyway." Now, for $100 you've lost 2 cycles of iPhone sales to your most loyal high end buyer.
It would be interesting to me to see which of these two options is more profitable for the company long term. I'd imagine Apple would see a pretty strong return on the investment of offering to pay the last month or two to ensure that these people upgrade to the newest phone and stay locked into their upgrade cycle, but it really comes down to how many people who want to upgrade would fall into the scenario above.
They don't put "emphasis" on the supply chain numbers, nor are the analysts "relentlessly negative." The supply chain is only one of many factors that analysts take into consideration in an effort forecast earnings, which is their job. Supply chain turns out to be a reasonably good marker for future sales. If it wasn't, they would not be researching the supply chain, and investors would disbelieve the research. Neither is the case, and that is true for a reason.
I usually wait until the third year to change my iPhone, having gone from 4, to 5s, and then 7. But the Lightning port on my 7 has been wonky for the past half year and I'm really tempted (read:want) to get this year's mid-tier phone to replace it. Anything from $900 up is too expensive for me to spend in a phone.
So federal securities crimes are being committed? Please elaborate.
I very much doubt that the yearly upgraders made up more than 10% (if that much) of all iPhone sales. If every fifth from that group then decides to switch to two years, that only reduces iPhone sales by 2%.
The problem is you're trying to apply "fan logic" to capitalism. It doesn't work. You care about Apple, they don't. They care about making money. You'd point to Apple's revenue and profit. They'd point to Apple YoY sales decline. You'd say Apple's positive numbers should drive the market. They'd say Apple's growth (or lack thereof) is the determining factor.
You talk about analysts and forum "haters" as if they are the same or the arguments against either group are interchangeable. They're not and they're not. Analyst aren't haters. They're capitalists.
Obviously i know wtf i signed... I'm saying apple releasing the X at a later time then releasing it earlier the following year is messing everyone up with the iPhone plan.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah but they end up with clicks either way. They generate interest with this and then when the phone launches, long before we get any firm numbers, they'll be talking about how the phone is doing poorly because availability is good.
June: "Apple slows orders on components based on weak previous iPhone (whichever) sales"
September: "iPhone sales tepid at launch as buyers continue to buy lesser iPhone models"
December: "New iPhone sales more popular than all other models combined but removal of headphone jack remains controversial..."
click click click...
OMG... I was thinking about that too last week.
I do like the iPhone upgrade option. However Citizens Bank customer services & website is HORRIBLE!!!!
Not an option to pay in advance at all just an account balance summary....
I called them and it took 45 min going through there auto prompt system to try to get to a rep & I was hung-up on.
2nd attempt 1hr 20 min to get to a live person and explain what I want to do which was pay in advance to make sure I'm ready for next launch. for the advance payment was an additional $10 service charge.... WTF!!!!
So I admit I could have just used my barclays card but figured I save it for new MBP & iPad but after this who knows...
Apple needs to have a chat with Citizens....
I'm not surprised that orders are expected to decline. I have an iPhone 7, and I'm very happy with it, even though this is the first time I haven't purchased a new phone every year. I'll probably get a new phone in the fall, but it's definitely not a sure thing.
Still, a 20% reduction seems huge, which makes me doubt the rumor is correct. There are other possibilities, too. Maybe Apple is trying to optimize its supply chain in some way to ensure better just in time manufacturing. Maybe there are more colors or some other reason to keep inventory more responsive to demand.
Still, a 20% reduction seems huge, which makes me doubt the rumor is correct. There are other possibilities, too. Maybe Apple is trying to optimize its supply chain in some way to ensure better just in time manufacturing. Maybe there are more colors or some other reason to keep inventory more responsive to demand.
At what point do rumor sites stop printing this garbage? Every year it’s the same crap then Apple reports record numbers. Rinse and repeat.
10-bit color "capture & display" is the ONLY new feature / capability that will prompt the masses to Upgrade ... and AAPL very-likely knows this ... as such, if they are reducing their Orders, then 10-bit color support is very-likely NOT being added later this year
I don’t see Apple giving up millions of dollars for loyalty. Either someone will need to compress their 12 month obligation into a shorter time period (effectively raising the per month fee) or wait. Apple won’t give up that much money just for goodwill. Now I can see them adding the overage onto the monthly payments instead of making people pay it upfront. That would solve the problem without them losing out on millions.
[doublepost=1528472676][/doublepost]
I very much doubt the masses even know what 10 bit color is. Most displays for years were really 6 bit and people thought they were awesome. What will trigger upgrading is likely going to be more computational photography options.10-bit color "capture & display" is the ONLY new feature / capability that will prompt the masses to Upgrade ... and AAPL very-likely knows this ... as such, if they are reducing their Orders, then 10-bit color support is very-likely NOT being added later this year
True story. And other part of this fan logic is that every bit of unfavorable news about Apple is automatically "stock market manipulation" (i.e., a federal crime). It's pretty much impossible to explain what analysts do to an audience of fans who don't understand the markets, or that while analysts are hardly always right, their job is to be as close to on the money as possible. You can explain all of that until you are blue in the face, all the while knowing that juicy conspiracy theories are going to be so much more appealing than the dull truth.