Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's still a tumor I wish wasn't there. Considering how fugly most (not all) iPhone photos look with the gross over-processing, I can't imagine there being much difference if the z-height was shrunk to fit in the device's chassis again. Or make the rest of it thicker. Either way. Weight shouldn't be too much of an issue since the phone should be the size of a so-called mini anyway #GotEm.
 
Why not just bring back Ive so products at least start to look exciting? Then bring back whoever was running retail before the ex-Burberry lady came and messed it all up. Together, they can take a shot at making the Apple experience great again. :)

And then bring back LCD screens for the phone and do away with temporal dithering on the Mac.
 
I wonder if you can eject the camera by pushing a pin into that black hole:

1707264012065.png
 
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but if they wanted to reduce the camera thickness without quality loss couldn’t they just make the camera wider instead?
 
What if, instead, they make the phone thicker in order to alleviate the "bump" and add a larger battery? 🤔💡
If somebody did the math on the volume of the current battery minus the volume of the camera bump, I would be curious to see what percentage of battery loss that would be? Im betting I would be ok with that battery loss in exchange for a flush camera.

Or if they are rearranging the inside (I know this is easier said than done) then find the volume of the camera bump, and translate that to extra thickness for the same battery life. Couldn’t be much more than 2-3 mm extra?
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.