I've said it before and I'll say it again. Apple. Release the usual 3.5 and another 4.3 inch super thin version. See how many buy the 3.5 version
This is just what Gruber made up not what Apple is doing. No one at Apple that actually know what is going on is talking, and those sources people talk to get their info from reading the blogs which just make up stuff. Look at what happened last year, everybody was sure the new iPhone was going to be a teardrop case with a 4" screen, and it never happened. All the sources were wrong.
The next iPhone design would have already been finalized by now and parts manufactures are already tooling up and production of the parts will start soon or they will never get it out the door by October. They may be testing different screen sizes but they will not change the aspect ratio and stuff they are still testing now will not be produced this year.
It would be stupid to change the aspect ratio and not increase the screen width. All it would do is create backwards comparability issues with new apps being developed for the extra height that would not work on older phones without side boxing which actually makes the screen width even narrower on older phones for those newer apps. And all existing apps would have to be boxed top and bottom until rewritten. It makes no sense at all, there is no advantage except a marketing blurb to say it has a larger screen, without really being larger and Apple does not work that way.
thought - Ios could set up apps to use a black frame - like SD res. on a wide screen TV. That'd lets "old" apps work without everyone freakin' out about needing to update their apps.
That mini connector is a game breaker for me. Seems pointless to invalidate the ten or so cables I have (car, truck, RV, 1 per room, recharching dock/alarm clock, etc). What would be the point of this?
Because Micro-USB is less capable than the 30-pin iPod connector (A USB to HDMI adaptor for example would not be feasible)
I think the main problem with having the aspect ratio change now is that Apple still has not released a method for delivering device/resolution specific application bundles. Adding more aspect ratios would cause application bundles to continually grow unnecessarily in size. While a small shift may not change that many applications, there are quite a few I can imagine which would have to add more graphic variations. This is only if the developers have programmed their applications correctly.
They're just saying that to avoid negative comments about Tim Cook's engineering strategies and talents. Also, saying that Steve had input on this design will boost sales when the phone is released. You can't believe every rumor you hear or every book you read.
Extra screen real estate is the perfect place for iAds. Maybe an iAd enable phone would allow Apple to sell these unlocked at the subsidized price direct to consumers? Kind of like Kindle??
I agree that the 30-pin connector is more capable then the Micro-USB, but that's not what my post was about. I was saying, if they are changing it, then why are they making a new type? Either keep the same old port, or change it to either Mini or Micro USB. Don't make a new type.
Changing the height only makes it very easy to deal with for most apps. In fact, because of the way Cocoa Touch is designed, many existing apps should "just work" at the new height.
Changing the width, on the other hand, would be significantly more complicated.
The problem would be finding an existing, small port that is capable of the speeds Apple may be going for. I think also somebody recently made a statement about wanting to "own all integral technologies" and less on licensing, in regards to Mapping - but the same could apply with Hardware - A smaller port would also be pretty great as then they may finally put stereo speakers on the bottom.
That doesnt meant the devs dont have to start working harder to accommodate yet another res. I lot of them wont even make an ipad version of their apps. Look at Google+, a huge company puts out an iphone only version and the 2X looks like crap.
I agree that the 30-pin connector is more capable then the Micro-USB, but that's not what my post was about. I was saying, if they are changing it, then why are they making a new type? Either keep the same old port, or change it to either Mini or Micro USB. Don't make a new type.
But, it doesn't. I just said that.
"The common chargers will be based around micro-USB technology and could see the end of proprietary power ports on handsets."(From the BBC link)
The EU require either
1. For you to have a micro-USB port, and, naturally a Micro-USB charger.
2. To provide an adapter so people can use standard chargers to charge the phone.
I'm confused by your replies. So if you're saying the adapter is optional and the charger meets the standards, then what are you saying the EU requires?
That's interesting...I used a 4" Windows Phone this weekend and typed on it (Portrait orientation) and it made a world of difference compared to my iPhone. Wish Apple would increase the iPhone vertically and horizontally.
Especially if you're using your iPhone in landscape to type in iMessage, you only see one line of the other person's text. It would be nice to see more than that...
Steve would have never allowed this
I am not saying it shouldn't be 1138 but isn't this nitpicking.
1138 / 16 = 71.125
1136 / 16 = 71
640 / 9 = 71.11111
And it's only 2 Pixel difference, they are so small you won't even see them.
I would prefer the new iPhone to be wider and have the same aspect ratio than a taller iPhone.
Technology changes. Deal with it. Were you complaining when we moved from RCA cables to HDMI? They are making the connector small to free up space for other things.
Also if you need to have 10 cables so you don't have to lug the cable around that's your problem.
Why not 1138x640? It would be true 16:9 aspect ratio?! Ridiculous rumor...
GROSS! Why even type that?