Because it's only a spec bump, I'd say "today".
You mean the day of WWDC?
Because it's only a spec bump, I'd say "today".
The Macbook Air is dead. Its not coming back, there is no reason with the 12" Macbook and the 13" Macbook Pro both being smaller than it.
Did 6 TB ports make the nMP a better workstation?That's a little harsh. What other laptop has 4 usbc/thunderbolt 3 ports? None. And they are very cool ports indeed.
Apple doesn't up date stuff, people complain.
Apple updates stuff 'not a re-release of stuff you just put out a few months ago.'... people complain.
You are absolutely right. Some of us are slow to learn.
All my external drives with photos and files are formatted in HFS. If I bought a PC desktop I would have had issues and headaches. I truely did not know how behind the times the Mini was until last week.
Yep.You mean the day of WWDC?
Make that the 2012 non-retina form factor with Kaby lake, 32gb, MagSafe, a big honkin battery and a top end mobile gpu ....
I hope theres more to it than just a touch bar
The Macbook Air is dead. Its not coming back, there is no reason with the 12" Macbook and the 13" Macbook Pro both being smaller than it.
Hope they spec bump the Air, its better than the 12 inch MacBook in almost every way for many people, ignoring the Retina display. Replace thunderbolt with USB c, put the latest processor and you, maybe a Retina display and it would be a winner. Apple will never do it because it would sell better than the 12 inch MacBook and that thing is their 'baby'.
The Macbook Air is a tank....nearly flawless. The screen is lower resolution, but very bright. The keyboard / trackpad is the best. The battery is terrific.
For Office productivity and mobility, I can find no flaws. I'd love one with upgraded components, for sure...SSD, 16gb RAM. Either that, or make it as cheap as a Chromebok.
As it stands, it is quite nice.
I think there's a difference with, release an iPad, release it again, release iPhone 7, release it again, release a macbook pro, release it again. While for 3+ years we've been asking to update our business, our households, with workstations and servers, what about all those hosting companies with super oudated mac minis that would love to stay in business because apple discontinued their 19" rack servers and big choices have to be made. The real world continues, it's not always just about your facebook like clicks.Apple doesn't up date stuff, people complain.
Apple updates stuff 'not a re-release of stuff you just put out a few months ago.'... people complain.
I'd be a terrible CEO, but so would you.LoL this made me laugh... very good I think you should be CEO of apple
Quite frequently actually. But I don't just use it for browsing brazzers.While I agree regarding the MBA, I can only assume you've never actually held a Macbook by giving that statement.
Then your compromise is your video card. This simply doesn't always hold up for the rest of us.You need that. I love my Macbook... A workstation doesn't fit my backpack when I travel for work.
Not every workstation requires a monitor. A server you can place in the network or at a hosting provider, etc or the 19" rack downstairs, yes, that would be great if it can stop being windows. Placing laptops in there is not the solution.High-end Pro workstations, sure, but servers?
By we, I mean the people that have a serious hobby, freelancers, business people, corporations, small to big business, school systems, govs, .. where big data to serious graphic work to prosumer usage comes into play. Not just people that browse facebook and vlog and export a 10 minute video and have hours to do so. Why would they max out a laptop to 5k$ and then add another $1500 for a monitor, when they could just buy a $3500 imac? Or have a range of imacs for the serious work and a mac server in the server room for handling all the rest? Still cheaper than a dozen laptops and monitors, external drives and a windows box for the network. No, we isn't just me. I just want an iMac that's not 2 years old.By "we" I assume you mean you personally. Workstation and servers are not Apple's target market and they have noted those specific pro users are a very small amount of their users. So it would make far more sense to cater to a much larger audience who do purchase Macbooks and Macbook Pros. They have admitted they will work on addressing the need of the people with more pro requirements but definitely not their priority.
While I know "983402" is a hyperbole, but I think of those numbers when I think of PC's which have countless endless versions, where is Apple has very few versions of their laptops. Having only three would not make any sense. Since Apple users are fall into different groups. Some want as small and light as possible and less concerned about extreme power. So a Macbook or Air makes far more sense for them. Where is Pro users are fine with bigger and heavier to get more power. So having a Macbook and Macbook Pro line to me makes perfect sense. The air line does make a bit less sense since you would think people would simply get a Macbook, but they dont because the Air is less money which is a top priority for many users, and because they legacy ports and what some consider a better keyboard. I think the air would certianly phase out some day once people stop buying them in large numbers.
Oh please no.Make this guy CEO please. Thanks.
If they make laptops aimed at pro users, let them put a real video card in there, it's ridiculous how windows laptops a third of the price but with a pretty good card cuts the work down by 30 to 50% - That the mac is more expensive for the right reasons (and yes that does include the design and macOS and the apple logo, fine by me) but put a card in there that throttles everything down and spits out an extra 15 minutes on everything.. ugh.No thanks. Having 2 models is good. Just get rid of the MBA as it's just outdated (although I still own mine from 2011). But having a form factors is good have one consumer Mac with option to become pro-sumer and one other Mac that's oriented to pro's and has all the necessary power and necessary upgrades.
Unfortunately that's true. The Air was more powerful, faster, and better equipped with ports, a decent keyboard and magsafe, but the new MacBook is cheaper to produce without all those extra components, and they can still charge a premium for it because it's thin and light, and that is all that matters anymore. These systems went from being marketed to actually being built as fashion accessories.
A 17" MBA would have been a better MacBook Pro than a MacBook Pro.
So it is just another case of 'It doesn't suit my needs, hence it doesn't suit anybodys needs'?Quite frequently actually. But I don't just use it for browsing brazzers.
M.2 slots don't take that much spaces...What I am saying is that a proper 17" MBP would weigh 3kg and probably have 1060 too (proper means that you can install a hard drive, among other things).
I will not buy a serious laptop that doesn't have both M.2 and 2.5".M.2 slots don't take that much spaces...