patents up the wazoo
If Apple bought TiVo, they'd have pretty much all the IP for set-top boxes in terms of DVR functionality.
*With such a patent portfolio at its disposal and with Apple's cash reserves to fund IP protection, Apple could put a big hurt on the cable companies with their DVR wares.
*TiVo filed a lawsuit against Dish Network (Echostar) over the Dish Player PVR once Dish started throwing in their offering for free with their regular service. The suit is not on antitrust groups but on patent infringement.
*TiVo has never sued Microsoft for the UltimateTV product, nor any of the machines that Windows Media Center PC OS runs atop. There is no evidence that the recent detente (sic) between Microsoft and TiVo in terms of using the TiVo-To-Go Service with Windows Media/Pocket PC portable devices include any sort of payola to cover Microsoft's own IP violations of TiVo's intellectual property in the past.
*TiVo has not sued Comcast over their deployment of the Motorola DVR series. Comcast is/was a shareholder in TiVo. However, that is not a barrier to suing; 3dfx wound up suing Sega over tearing up their contract to supply the graphics chipset in the Dreamcast when Microsoft successfully pressured Sega to opt for the NEC PowerVR chipset instead. The backstory to that was NEC complained to Microsoft over the deal and Microsoft made Sega change chipsets since Microsoft paid for the Dreamcast development (it ran WinCE) and everyone should consider the Dreamcast as the Xbox-beta (or alpha).
*Likewise, TiVo has not sued Charter or Time Warner Cable for offering the Motorola or Moxi set-top boxes.
*TiVo could also challenge DirecTV over supplying a DirecTV branded DVR based upon the design by NDS. NDS of Britain is a company owned by Rupert Murdoch whose News Corp. (aka "Fox") owns 33% of DirecTV stock. It is Murdoch's meddling that is forcing DirecTV to "change" platforms, not a grand design on DirecTV's part to ruin TiVo. If Apple does not buy TiVo, I expect Murdoch to snap it up so he has leverage with the IP portfolio to make sure all the cablecos offer any new channels News Corp. decides to debut. Murdoch picked quite a fight with Time Warner when he launched Fox News and Time Warner refused to carry the network on the Time Warner Cable systems. That was a very expensive fight that Murdoch would most likely want to avoid. NDS has yet to ship working software that matches TiVo, even after boasting for 3 years now that they'd be superior.
*If Apple wanted to dominate the DVR IP, they'd have to buy up ReplayTV (and finally put that product line out of its misery) from D&M Holdings, which is Denon. A few years back (and I can't recall if it was the Replay under SonicBlue or not), ReplayTV and TiVo slugged it out in court over IP...after wasting tons of money, they cross-licensed their portfolios. If memory recalls, ReplayTV licensed some of their IP to Scientific Atlanta for their set-top boxes. TiVo has licensed their IP for some of Sony's DVR products in Japan.
*And of course, Hauppage, ATi, and Nvidia must also have IP in terms of DVR like features on the PC platforms via their tv tuner cards.
All in all, he who holds these patent porfolios and wishes to actually enforce them would be far more successful facing down the cablecos and satellite providers than a company just entering the market today. All the more reason for Apple to acquire TiVo.
If Apple bought TiVo, they'd have pretty much all the IP for set-top boxes in terms of DVR functionality.
*With such a patent portfolio at its disposal and with Apple's cash reserves to fund IP protection, Apple could put a big hurt on the cable companies with their DVR wares.
*TiVo filed a lawsuit against Dish Network (Echostar) over the Dish Player PVR once Dish started throwing in their offering for free with their regular service. The suit is not on antitrust groups but on patent infringement.
*TiVo has never sued Microsoft for the UltimateTV product, nor any of the machines that Windows Media Center PC OS runs atop. There is no evidence that the recent detente (sic) between Microsoft and TiVo in terms of using the TiVo-To-Go Service with Windows Media/Pocket PC portable devices include any sort of payola to cover Microsoft's own IP violations of TiVo's intellectual property in the past.
*TiVo has not sued Comcast over their deployment of the Motorola DVR series. Comcast is/was a shareholder in TiVo. However, that is not a barrier to suing; 3dfx wound up suing Sega over tearing up their contract to supply the graphics chipset in the Dreamcast when Microsoft successfully pressured Sega to opt for the NEC PowerVR chipset instead. The backstory to that was NEC complained to Microsoft over the deal and Microsoft made Sega change chipsets since Microsoft paid for the Dreamcast development (it ran WinCE) and everyone should consider the Dreamcast as the Xbox-beta (or alpha).
*Likewise, TiVo has not sued Charter or Time Warner Cable for offering the Motorola or Moxi set-top boxes.
*TiVo could also challenge DirecTV over supplying a DirecTV branded DVR based upon the design by NDS. NDS of Britain is a company owned by Rupert Murdoch whose News Corp. (aka "Fox") owns 33% of DirecTV stock. It is Murdoch's meddling that is forcing DirecTV to "change" platforms, not a grand design on DirecTV's part to ruin TiVo. If Apple does not buy TiVo, I expect Murdoch to snap it up so he has leverage with the IP portfolio to make sure all the cablecos offer any new channels News Corp. decides to debut. Murdoch picked quite a fight with Time Warner when he launched Fox News and Time Warner refused to carry the network on the Time Warner Cable systems. That was a very expensive fight that Murdoch would most likely want to avoid. NDS has yet to ship working software that matches TiVo, even after boasting for 3 years now that they'd be superior.
*If Apple wanted to dominate the DVR IP, they'd have to buy up ReplayTV (and finally put that product line out of its misery) from D&M Holdings, which is Denon. A few years back (and I can't recall if it was the Replay under SonicBlue or not), ReplayTV and TiVo slugged it out in court over IP...after wasting tons of money, they cross-licensed their portfolios. If memory recalls, ReplayTV licensed some of their IP to Scientific Atlanta for their set-top boxes. TiVo has licensed their IP for some of Sony's DVR products in Japan.
*And of course, Hauppage, ATi, and Nvidia must also have IP in terms of DVR like features on the PC platforms via their tv tuner cards.
All in all, he who holds these patent porfolios and wishes to actually enforce them would be far more successful facing down the cablecos and satellite providers than a company just entering the market today. All the more reason for Apple to acquire TiVo.