Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If they stated "Apple Stores will remain Closed until AT LEAST the END of April," I would believe it.

As such, I do NOT !

ALSO, as it currently stands, I believe the NBA will END its suspension on ~June 1st.
 
Apple should close all of its stores indefinitely until a cure is found. Will Apple employees disinfect every iPhones, iPads, laptops, and other devices each time a customer touches the ones that are on display?
 
Everyone seems to be picking 2 weeks to close things. The local schools in my area, Disney World, Universal, Busch Gardens, and now all the Apple stores.... Is there a magic fix coming within the next 2 weeks?
Yes. In 2 weeks we will all be under mandatory lockup with national guard policing the streets. I’m not joking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn
I know all the numbers. I know markets recover. I know this is likely very temporary.

What I simply can't understand is how 80,000 Americans can die of influenza in single year and people keep pounding the table about flu vaccines, Tamiflu, and built up immunity which makes flu "not a big deal" in comparison to Covid19. Is it more contangious? Maybe, but the flu is evidently pretty damn contagious. The 80,000 deaths in the US is a fact and worldwide, that number is estimated to be 646,000 in a new study for a single year. Those are dead people from the flu.

In fact, the ONLY nugget of information that is even remotely supportive of Covid19 being worse is the fact it currently has a higher mortality rate, very early on. However, simple logic tells you the unreported cases are likely astronomical in comparison to the reported cases, but death rates are far more likely to be closer to the truth. This indicates the true mortality rate is quite a bit lower, which Fauci published early on and despite somewhat walking it back, still is extrapolating the unknown.

I fully realize the unknown is what's scary. I fully understand it. I support being careful, taking precautions, and even some extreme measures. I just question, when and where does it stop? We gave a new virus a fancy name and it cripples the world while other viruses are causing far more damage and no one cares.

The likely end game is this virus becomes another virus we very poorly combat with vaccines and treatments, but this kills the elderly and weakened at a disproportionate rate...just like the flu does currently (except a lot more people die from it than Covid19).
With 80,000 flu deaths in 2018, that implies 80 million were infected, with a death rate of 0.1%. With a mortality rate of 1-2%, those 80,000 deaths would have been 800,000 to 1.6 million.

Note that in my original post that you quoted, I mistakenly wrote that 100,000 to 200,000 deaths would be expected from 100 million infections. I should have written 1-2 million. (I’ve corrected the original post.)

The fact that there is an asymptomatic period of contagion and that the number of additional people a person with the virus will infect (R0) of this Coronavirus is about 2.2 compared to the flu at 1.3 means that the total number of cases could potentially be as high or higher than the seasonal flu.

The only way to lessen the impact of COVID-19 is to minimize the number of infections. Anything that can be done to reduce infections will pay off greatly.

It’s not that the flu isn’t bad, but this has the potential to be much worse. Dr. Fauchi hasn’t somewhat walked back his earlier statement, he’s completely thrown it away. The reason the mortality rate has not been adjusted down is that is not the case that there are large numbers of asymptomatic or unreported cases. Those that are sick are getting tested, and positives are in the denominator (reported cases).

The fact that the virus hits hardest the elderly and those with compromised immune systems and existing health issues is not comforting to me in the least.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
"If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%," Fauci and his colleagues explained.

"This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza pandemic [which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%] or a pandemic influenza [similar to those in 1957 and 1968]," the experts wrote.


Nice extrapolation of death rates, but that's not how this works. THE expert in the field published the above, Dr. Fauci.

You just took 3% (ridiculous mortality rate assumption if denominator does indeed rise to anything huge) and assumed nearly every person on the planet would be infected, equally ridiculous.

It's no surprise there is this much panic with the numbers people are doing in their heads.

80,000 Americans died from the flu (CDC) in 2018 and basically no one cared or talked about it.

[automerge]1584234056[/automerge]
Well believe me or not...I have a direct family member who worked directly with Dr Fauci who was leading the measles and mumps outbreak in the 90s that hit the nation at a major University and their health Center ...they said their estimates are always on the high end and Fauci has to be more pessimistic because unfortunately if he’s optimistic and he’s wrong then there will be hell to pay. They always side on the worst case and rejoice when it’s almost never that.[/url]
[automerge]1584204961[/automerge]


That’s also a northern state that’s winters last into April where most of us will be in warmer weather in 2 weeks which slows respiratory viruses drastically.
Winters don’t last into April in Washington State. It doesn’t even snow in Seattle most of winters. It’s not a northern state. It’s Pacific Northwest, which is moderate in both winter and summer with a lot of rain. Has nothing to do with a northern state, which has continental climate with severe winters and hot summers.
 
Last edited:
Yes. In 2 weeks we will all be under mandatory lockup with national guard policing the streets. I’m not joking.
That is quite alarmist, and nothing but a guess. But if you’re right and the government intends to put us under lockdown, they better damn well have effective testing by then.

There’s no worse place for a healthy person to be than locked down with someone who is infected. That has the potential to at least double the number of infected persons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
What I simply can't understand is how 80,000 Americans can die of influenza in single year and people keep pounding the table about flu vaccines, Tamiflu, and built up immunity which makes flu "not a big deal" in comparison to Covid19.
It's not that the flu is "not a big deal," but flu outbreaks only go so far because of herd immunity. That is not the case here. The potential number of infections for Covid-19 is basically everyone. That's not the case with the flu. So even if they had the same mortality rate, the potential downside risk of Covid-19 is vastly greater.
 
With 80,000 flu deaths in 2018, that implies 80 million were infected, with a death rate of 0.1%. With a mortality rate of 1-2%, those 80,000 deaths would have been 800,000 to 1.6 million.

Note that in my original post that you quoted, I mistakenly wrote that 100,000 to 200,000 deaths would be expected from 100 million infections. I should have written 1-2 million. (I’ve corrected the original post.)

The fact that there is an asymptomatic period of contagion and that the number of additional people a person with the virus will infect (R0) of this Coronavirus is about 2.2 compared to the flu at 1.3 means that the total number of cases could potentially be as high or higher than the seasonal flu.

The only way to lessen the impact of COVID-19 is to minimize the number of infections. Anything that can be done to reduce infections will pay off greatly.

It’s not that the flu isn’t bad, but this has the potential to be much worse. Dr. Fauchi hasn’t somewhat walked back his earlier statement, he’s completely thrown it away. The reason the mortality rate has not been adjusted down is that is not the case that there are large numbers of asymptomatic or unreported cases. Those that are sick are getting tested, and positives are in the denominator (reported cases).

The fact that the virus hits hardest the elderly and those with compromised immune systems and existing health issues is not comforting to me in the least.
Just logic would tell me the death rate in 2018 for the flu was higher than 0.1% and/or the infections were lower than 80M.

I also still don’t see how more positive cases won’t decrease the mortality rate. Thing is, the damn virus is still not very widespread. Maybe we will get there.

Our quasi quarantine in the US is a complete joke, so we are going to find out how serious this is.
[automerge]1584235855[/automerge]
It's not that the flu is "not a big deal," but flu outbreaks only go so far because of herd immunity. That is not the case here. The potential number of infections for Covid-19 is basically everyone. That's not the case with the flu. So even if they had the same mortality rate, the potential downside risk of Covid-19 is vastly greater.
That is one of the first fair points I’ve seen, but clearly the heard immunity doesn’t work *that* well. It’s at minimum overrated.

As I responded to above, let’s just ASSUME a 0.1% death rate in the year 80,000 people in America died from the flu, that implies 80,000,000 people got the flu....which is 1 in 4 people in America.

The flu has many strains which is very key to the vaccine being so ineffective in some cases.
 
Last edited:
Re: S Korea, they’re still at the beginning. They’ve got a lot of active cases. Only 786 cases have reached resolution, with 72 of them having died. Of course that doesn’t mean there’s a 9% fatality rate, because most of the active cases will recover. But their current death rate has already edged up to 0.9%.

View attachment 899153


And while it’s true that early on, Dr. Fauchi did mention a lower fatality rate, he has changed his thinking. He now talks about a death rate that may be as low as 1%. It doesn’t seem to be as high overall as the WHO estimate of 3.4% (increased from an earlier 2% estimate). China is at about 4.7%. Something in the range of 1% to 2% would be a decent guess it seems to me. (Don’t forget that by all accounts, it’s also more contagious than the flu.)

The outcome of this pandemic in the US will ultimately depend on how many people contract the virus. If 100 million get it, I think it’s likely that the number of deaths will be in the 1-2 million [corrected] range. Without treatment, a vaccine or any immunity, it’s very important to stop the spread of the virus as much as possible.

There’s nothing to be gained by soft pedaling this situation. Without any real testing having been conducted yet, it’s safer to overreact than it is to rely on the fact that it’s not that bad (yet).

What happens to the market happens to the market. Two or five years from now it likely won’t have mattered whether Dow 21,000 was the bottom or if it hits 15,000 in a few weeks or months. See it as a buying opportunity and continue to dollar cost average in.

This is a natural disaster and the markets will recover. But with both supply and demand shocks to producers and consumers, it would seem likely that we’re in for a global recession. Hopefully short lived.

Without consumers spending, the government needs to step in and increase demand. Best done by an increase in transfer payments, i.e. checks to citizens. Sick pay, unemployment benefits, medical expenses, childcare etc. That money gets spent quickly.

Maybe something as simple as $2,000 per taxpayer and $1,000 per child. Anyone making under maybe 250k. Just get it out there and quick to minimize the damage and keep this to maybe a one year blip.
So far, consumers have been spending like there is no tomorrow. People spent thousands on groceries and all sorts of products to last them for a long time.
 
Apple should close all of its stores indefinitely until a cure is found. Will Apple employees disinfect every iPhones, iPads, laptops, and other devices each time a customer touches the ones that are on display?

A ‘cure’ doesn’t stop the issue at hand. It’s controlling the masses to ‘slow the spread’ per se. keep in mind, if this strain continues to mutate, there is no ‘one’ cure either. This is a very dynamic situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
That is quite alarmist, and nothing but a guess. But if you’re right and the government intends to put us under lockdown, they better damn well have effective testing by then.

There’s no worse place for a healthy person to be than locked down with someone who is infected. That has the potential to at least double the number of infected persons.
Are you living in a dorm? Because if you are living with your family, you will be stuck with them whether one or more is sick or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
That's a mischaracterization of what I wrote. Disinfect metal, glass, and plastic components of electronic devices on display before touching them.

Or use hand sanitizer on yourself after touching them.

In the world are infinite numbers of things you touch all day that are also touched by other people. In any store you go to, pretty much, are products that any number of people touch during a day. You can’t keep every store closed forever.
 
How could I not see that? You've gotten that hospital factoid from the millions of times it's been said on TV. I get it. That is an issue and I totally concede and agree with it.

What I don't agree with is that COVID19 is worse than influenza. You also just infected 300M people in America and said 10% would need hospitalization. I mean, I'm just not going to say, "Yeah, I agree with that." I'm having a problem with the extrapolation of infection and people calling this 20X deadlier than the flu.

What I'm preaching for is more calm, less media fear mongering, and a little perspective. The flu facts are relevant also.

And BTW, everything is NOT closing. If your solution is shutting down Disney, closing Apple stores, and cancelling sports, this is going to fail miserable and already has if it's anywhere near as bad as you're extrapolating.

I'm in a top 5 city and people are out and about, if nothing more than congregating at the gym, grocery stores, restaurants, fast food, Starbucks, and malls that are all still open. Think about that. That's nothing like what China did. We are already screwed if it's bad.

This is out...now we are going to have to deal with it. We'll see if I'm wrong and 300M Americans get it with a 2.7% death rate.


Why do you put words into my mouth? I never said that 10% WOULD need hospitalization, I said IF. You HAVE to plan for worst case situations. You can’t just hope things aren’t as bad, or say “we”ll see”. “We’ll see” is not a plan of action. By the time we see, it is too late.

I do agree with you that more needs to close though. Not all of that. Restaurants and fast food may be the only way some get their meals for whatever reason. I am certainly not an advocate for cutting off people from food. Using that logic we’d have to close all the grocery stores too. Then what?
 
All this is doing is shifting the burden to Authorized Service Providers, who are too small to shut down. We had a huge uptick in business today, mostly from canceled Apple appointments, and most of them were angry at us, and few produced much money.
 
what “word choice” do you refer to?
Greater China, which includes Taiwan. How often you hear people use that kind of term to refer to these places. As CEO got to be mindful and sensitive to word they use. The whole thing is almost giving china credit for controlling the outbreak that they started and saying everywhere else is more dangerous. CDC still list China as level 3 and what is Apple to say it is safe or safer. The term is like saying US' s continent but the continent doesn't belong to US.
 
Apple should close all of its stores indefinitely until a cure is found. Will Apple employees disinfect every iPhones, iPads, laptops, and other devices each time a customer touches the ones that are on display?

Well there won't be a cure for at least a year so that is not happening.
[automerge]1584244596[/automerge]
Yes. In 2 weeks we will all be under mandatory lockup with national guard policing the streets. I’m not joking.

No, first of all there are not enough resources to enforce that, second, people would still need to go out for certain things.
 
Greater China, which includes Taiwan. How often you hear people use that kind of term to refer to these places. As CEO got to be mindful and sensitive to word they use. The whole thing is almost giving china credit for controlling the outbreak that they started and saying everywhere else is more dangerous. CDC still list China as level 3 and what is Apple to say it is safe or safer. The term is like saying US' s continent but the continent doesn't belong to US.

Apple always uses the phrase “greater china.” That’s how they do their financial reporting every quarter and in their annual report. “Greater China” doesn’t mean “better” china. It means China + Taiwan + Hong Kong + Macau. They’ve consistently used this term for years. See, e.g. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-01/apple-in-greater-china

It’s also a commonly used term, not just by apple. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_China

(P.S. I don’t know what you are talking about once you get past the first sentence. The U.S.’s continent is North America. It’s also my continent. And Canada’s continent. And Mexico’s continent. I’m not really sure why it’s allegedly objectionable to say “US’s continent” according to you. But if you’re that sensitive, maybe choose more carefully what you read?)
 
That is one of the first fair points I’ve seen, but clearly the heard immunity doesn’t work *that* well. It’s at minimum overrated.

As I responded to above, let’s just ASSUME a 0.1% death rate in the year 80,000 people in America died from the flu, that implies 80,000,000 people got the flu....which is 1 in 4 people in America.

The flu has many strains which is very key to the vaccine being so ineffective in some cases.
But it's not JUST herd immunity. It's also the fact that people who got the flu vaccine and still get the flu (my whole family this year!) tend to have much better outcomes than people who get the flu without a vaccination. The flu vaccine both keeps the infection rate a lot lower than it would be and keeps the mortality rate down among those who do get the flu after getting the vaccine. Obviously, neither of these benefits are in play with covid-19.

All of which is to say: yes, the flu is very dangerous, but this is a whole different beast with the *potential* for much worse outcomes.
 
A ‘cure’ doesn’t stop the issue at hand. It’s controlling the masses to ‘slow the spread’ per se. keep in mind, if this strain continues to mutate, there is no ‘one’ cure either. This is a very dynamic situation.

My comment was not so much about as it was about changing behaviors. My point was this: crowded Apple stores with devices on display that are not disinfected each time a customer touches them is not safe.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
No, the actual death rate won't increase over time - its a rate and presumably roughly constant - at least for a particular population (it may well vary between countries with different age distributions and healthcare quality).

You're missing the point that we simply don't know the real total number of infections. The experts are guessing that it might be 5 to 10 times the number of reported/tested cases, because most people with mild symptoms simply haven't been tested. Any "death rate" figure you get based on the number of reported infections will likely be an over estimate, as the reports are skewed towards more serious cases. Going forward, in the UK at least, they've said that they're only going to test people who are ill and in hospital, so there won't be any validity to the deaths/cases figure.

As you say, there will be a time lag between deaths and infections - so if you did know the current number of infections the death rate you got might be an under-estimate. But deaths/reported infections could still be a huge over estimate.

The point is there is a factor of 10 between the worst and best estimates of the number of infections - any death rate calculated from that data is therefore hogwash. The only definite thing we know is that the number of reported/tested infections is less than the real number.

Those same experts who initially said that (e.g. Fauci) have since backtracked, saying that the WHO investigation into the outbreak in China does not support those assumptions and it's unlikely that those guesses are correct. Another poster referenced this before you replied to me. Continuing with the bolded thinking in order to reduce panic or make people think that the death rate looks worse than it is, is politically-driven at best and deluded at worst. The UK deliberate (in)action over testing will not have a long term pay off. It is worse than China was accused of in fudging the figures, because it's overtly doing so.

The death rate by any data we can get will increase over time, especially where thorough testing still occurs. People don't die immediately. Some take time to die in the same way everyone takes time to recover. The initial outbreak and huge number of cases suppress the death rate and it takes time to catch up.
[automerge]1584255731[/automerge]
Just logic would tell me the death rate in 2018 for the flu was higher than 0.1% and/or the infections were lower than 80M.

I also still don’t see how more positive cases won’t decrease the mortality rate. Thing is, the damn virus is still not very widespread. Maybe we will get there.

Our quasi quarantine in the US is a complete joke, so we are going to find out how serious this is.
[automerge]1584235855[/automerge]

That is one of the first fair points I’ve seen, but clearly the heard immunity doesn’t work *that* well. It’s at minimum overrated.

As I responded to above, let’s just ASSUME a 0.1% death rate in the year 80,000 people in America died from the flu, that implies 80,000,000 people got the flu....which is 1 in 4 people in America.

The flu has many strains which is very key to the vaccine being so ineffective in some cases.

I question why you're making these wild - and incorrect - assumptions when data exists.

 
For all of you that think this is overkill! Listen to your medical professionals and not politicians, COVID-19 is no joke! It is going to get 1000 times worst! Watch the Joe Rogan interview with Infectious Disease Expert Michael Osterholm!

1000 times worst, jeez!!!! Yet in China its slowed to a trickle of new cases!!! Government enforced 2 week lock down kills the spead!!
#washyourhands!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.