I work in a Windows office with two Macs. The Windows machines, bought in 2009 for the most part, are broken, each in its own way. The two Macs, made in 2008 and 2012, work like the day they were bought.
Thank god they run Windows..... so one can keep using it with the latest OS when Apple decide to cut SW support for a pretty good machine![]()
I had totally forgotten about the flower power iMac! Oh man, I wonder if I can find one of those on eBay...The replacement is the late 2011 or 2012 MBP or one of the newer rMBPs. Maybe you don't like the retina form factor, but no computer company sells the same laptop for 6 years.
[doublepost=1480448512][/doublepost]
2001
![]()
Ok. You work, I assume. I also assume you've got a savings account and retirement. I also assume those are non-zero. Therefore, following your logic, we should stop paying you above your minimum requirement of survival, right? You stated that exact thing above - you have more money than you need, so why give you more?
Smh
If you've got an early 2011 MBP it's worth getting the battery replaced by Apple now - even if it doesn't need it.
Because once it's become Vintage the only option is to try and find some dodgy third party one. Endless hassle as I found to my cost...
This is not what I meant. It looks like they are discontinuing most of their computers (Mac Pro, iMac, mac mini etc.). My point is that these are all obsolete already as we are seeing the last iteration of Mac computers.
I love mine, upgraded the RAM to 8gb a few years back machine runs like a champ
This vid just shows how relatively needless it is to upgrade to a new machine for most home users that don't need the absolute fastest processing power. For day-to-day usage and the user experience, there just isn't that much (if any) difference.Gonna miss my 2010 and 2011 MacBook Pros
In fact I was a little disappointed by the overall 'average' speed of my 2016 Touchbar MacBook Pro vs my 2010 MacBook Pro...
So true! I wish they'd make a new one :/The 17" MacBook Pro was an extraordinary machine!
I think it's unlikely these models will be getting the next year's macOS upgrade. And I think that's reasonable. If people want to be taking advantage of all the great features and innovations in the newest versions of macOS then they really need to help support Apple by buying new systems. 5 years is long enough.
I had an early 2011 15" MBP that I replaced with the retina 2012 model. They aren't significantly different hardware wise. That 2011 model was and still should be pretty powerful. It has a quad-core i7 and SSD with a graphics card plenty powerful enough to drive a non-retina display. Can't remember, does this mean it won't get macOS updates either?
We're coming into a weird age where computers aren't getting much faster each year but companies are still having to obsolete older ones despite the fact that they still run fine. It's weird and seems wasteful.
Five years has ALWAYS been Apple's guideline for marking a machine "Obsolete" for service purposes, which is all this is.
It is the customers' fault. If the customers demanded the cMBP, Apple would sell it. The only people who want it are those who really need an internal DVD drive or hate the super nice retina display for some reason. So... not enough to make it worth producing.
Now, you can argue that all the stuff Apple is discontinuing this year is actually in high demand and should be worth producing. IDK what their problem is.
Somehow never heard of that term until now. In some ways Apple has really been pushing things forward, cutting down on materials that are bad for the environment and building robots like Liam to deconstruct iPhone for recycling. But on the other hand there's the issue at hand about obsoleting devices that work fine. Looking at the definition of greenwashing, I'd say out of all the companies out there, Apple is one of the lightest offenders. But they still have work to do. It's tricky to balance being environmentally friendly with making money. If they make their devices too well then they'll run forever. Having a fast machine that runs forever is the ultimate environmentally friendly thing to build, but it directly contradicts capitalism. On the other hand, capitalism and communism gone rampant has caused global warming. Many intelligent people would agree that we need a better system, but as flawed humans we're thus far incapable of creating such a society without killing off freedom and diversity.That's because it is wasteful.Greenwashingly wasteful.
Since the day Tim took over....whoa!Whoa, when did Apple start selling flowers? MacRumors, you totally missed that story...