Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Thank god they run Windows..... so one can keep using it with the latest OS when Apple decide to cut SW support for a pretty good machine :D

My 2010 17" runs Windows much, much better than MacOS. Linux of course runs very well, too. It'll be supported for Windows/Linux operating systems for many years to come yet.
 
The replacement is the late 2011 or 2012 MBP or one of the newer rMBPs. Maybe you don't like the retina form factor, but no computer company sells the same laptop for 6 years.
[doublepost=1480448512][/doublepost]
2001
the-evolution-of-the-imac-9-728.jpg
I had totally forgotten about the flower power iMac! Oh man, I wonder if I can find one of those on eBay...
 
Heck...Last year Dell didn't have a motherboard to sell me for my XPS 2710 which I believe I bought in '13.
 
Ok. You work, I assume. I also assume you've got a savings account and retirement. I also assume those are non-zero. Therefore, following your logic, we should stop paying you above your minimum requirement of survival, right? You stated that exact thing above - you have more money than you need, so why give you more?

Smh

Your examples don't really apply. Individual vs. large corporation.

And yes, IF I had a lot of money (like they do right now) I would be just fine,
not needing any support.
 
If you've got an early 2011 MBP it's worth getting the battery replaced by Apple now - even if it doesn't need it.

Because once it's become Vintage the only option is to try and find some dodgy third party one. Endless hassle as I found to my cost...

That is exactly what I recommend to people as well. A couple of years ago, I was giving a MacBook Pro to my mother, and took the computer into Apple to get the battery swapped.

They ran the standard battery test, then had to get a senior manager to allow them to replace the good original battery with a new one at the Apple Store. It was not a problem, paid the fee for the battery service and had a new one in the computer an hour later.

It was worth it to not deal with third party batteries.
 
This is not what I meant. It looks like they are discontinuing most of their computers (Mac Pro, iMac, mac mini etc.). My point is that these are all obsolete already as we are seeing the last iteration of Mac computers.

Certainly looks like it.

Maybe their ultimate vision is that we can sit down with a device any place where there is a cloud connection. That connection then runs their macOS, with all of our bought apps, which are also in the cloud, so we don't even have to have any computers other than iPads/large phones or hybrid devices we do not know yet.

We are telling that macOS via voice commands what to do. (Probably not SIRI, which was always doa for me)
Waiting for that wristband computer we can talk into. (Not the iWatch)

Apple certainly has given up on many aspects of pro business and seem no longer be interested in certain markets. (Gaming, etc.)


Maybe they'll make one more iMac people can get upset about.

The entire high tech field seems saturated with nothing revolutionary on the horizon and everybody copying each other.
 
still rocking a 21" Imac from 2011, use it everyday it's been a great machine, I5, 12gb Ram, itsupports my Plex media and I use it for almost everything.
 
Well, guess it's time for the Early 2009 Mac Mini I have (that I've only had for a month, picked it up for free from a college) to prepare to meet its maker.

I upgraded it to 8GB RAM and an 840 EVO SSD, but it still chugs fairly often on El Capitan. I could try dropping back to Yosemite or even Mavericks, but I don't know.

I've been wanting to do a Z170/Skylake Hackintosh build... but I don't think I can discuss that here. ;)
 
Gonna miss my 2010 and 2011 MacBook Pros

In fact I was a little disappointed by the overall 'average' speed of my 2016 Touchbar MacBook Pro vs my 2010 MacBook Pro...

This vid just shows how relatively needless it is to upgrade to a new machine for most home users that don't need the absolute fastest processing power. For day-to-day usage and the user experience, there just isn't that much (if any) difference.

p.s. Even my "vintage" 2008 15" MBPro (+SSD) C2Duo runs flawlessly for web browsing/word processing etc. The only trick is to NOT upgrade it past Snow Leopard... :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Retrofire
This whole thing is cracking me up. I'm writing this from my Early 2011 MBP. It just had its motherboard replaced for the GPU issue (for free) earlier this year. And it is on its 3rd HDD (last two being SSDs, the 2nd of which just got too small).

I will eventually replace it with a new MBP, even though I have a new work-provided Dell laptop sitting next to it that I haven't logged into for a few days. (It contains the older Samsung 830 originally in this MBP)

I'm simply better at my job when working from a Mac, so to me it's worth it. Nearly everyone seems to be whining about the cost of a new MBP. They've always been expensive. And people have always whined about it. Yes, I would have liked to have seen more "revolution" than "evolution" in the current MBP lineup, but honestly, I haven't heard a single negative thing about the new ones from people who actually own one. But I have heard MANY surprised reactions at how much they love them.

So yeah, maybe I'm a fanboi. But it works for me, and if I get 6 years out of a $2,500 computer, ≈$450/year ain't bad for a tool I use all day every work day.

But obviously YMMV.
 
I think it's unlikely these models will be getting the next year's macOS upgrade. And I think that's reasonable. If people want to be taking advantage of all the great features and innovations in the newest versions of macOS then they really need to help support Apple by buying new systems. 5 years is long enough.

This is not about great features or innovations on Macs (no one really asked for or really needs)

It is about security updates (this could be an android thread)

Machines left without os upgrades will be phased out of security updates not so long after

Nowadays computers last a lot longer than they did 10 or 20 years ago. 5 years to a computer today is nothing. I have a machine from 2009 that is running perfectly fine today. Well, I have one Windows and one Apple machine from 2009. Guess which one still is supported...

Good suppport sells but unfortunately not in the short term.

In the meantime, as computers continue to last longer than ever before, the PC age has been replaced by a smart device age with devices that evolve and get obsolete as quickly as once did computers. And so, margins are shifting from computers to smart devices. and so, support wise ... this is what we get.

The computer and notebook world today is a totally different kind of animal as the smartphone (and tablet) world. Smartphones today are getting obsolete at a pace as did PCs ... 20 years ago. And even smartphones slowed down in the last couple of years.

Just do not treat PCs the same as you did 10 to 15 years ago. MS did get it with W8 and 10, Apple does not. This is what is really sad. Not users hanging on to 5 year old perfectly good hardware. Not a good mindset.

Better not mention the Mac hardware upgrade cycles .. those are even more sad

It is dangerous for a company to focus and rely on on one product family only. Forgetting about computers today is not caring about your safety net you might desperately need tomorrow.

The rebels have become fat and lazy ...
 
I'm hoping the quantum shift to SSD and retina will mean 2012 rMBP stay out the obsolete list for a very long time. Especially considering most models of similar price now are worse. It'd be hard for Apple to justify dumping support on those.

Apple please don't be dicks
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
I had an early 2011 15" MBP that I replaced with the retina 2012 model. They aren't significantly different hardware wise. That 2011 model was and still should be pretty powerful. It has a quad-core i7 and SSD with a graphics card plenty powerful enough to drive a non-retina display. Can't remember, does this mean it won't get macOS updates either?

We're coming into a weird age where computers aren't getting much faster each year but companies are still having to obsolete older ones despite the fact that they still run fine. It's weird and seems wasteful.

That's because it is wasteful. :apple: Greenwashingly wasteful.
[doublepost=1480454424][/doublepost]
Five years has ALWAYS been Apple's guideline for marking a machine "Obsolete" for service purposes, which is all this is.

Willfully obsolete. It's a choice.
 
It is the customers' fault. If the customers demanded the cMBP, Apple would sell it. The only people who want it are those who really need an internal DVD drive or hate the super nice retina display for some reason. So... not enough to make it worth producing.

Now, you can argue that all the stuff Apple is discontinuing this year is actually in high demand and should be worth producing. IDK what their problem is.

Oh, trust me, there is a lot of demand for a full tower from Apple (at least from the creative community). 4,1 and 5,1 cMPs still get a good price on eBay and many people (including myself) just keep upgrading them (SSDs, better GPUs, USB 3 cards, new CPUs, etc.,). If Apple release a nMP in a normal tower form factor that had user upgradeable parts it would sell like hotcakes.

Not that this is scientific or anything, but in my 15yrs of working in the very Mac centric world of video/film post production I've never seen such a low opinion of Apple as I have over the past few years. Many people I know have moved to Windows or built HackIntoshes (or are doing everything they can to upgrade their cMP).
 
That's because it is wasteful. :apple: Greenwashingly wasteful.
Somehow never heard of that term until now. In some ways Apple has really been pushing things forward, cutting down on materials that are bad for the environment and building robots like Liam to deconstruct iPhone for recycling. But on the other hand there's the issue at hand about obsoleting devices that work fine. Looking at the definition of greenwashing, I'd say out of all the companies out there, Apple is one of the lightest offenders. But they still have work to do. It's tricky to balance being environmentally friendly with making money. If they make their devices too well then they'll run forever. Having a fast machine that runs forever is the ultimate environmentally friendly thing to build, but it directly contradicts capitalism. On the other hand, capitalism and communism gone rampant has caused global warming. Many intelligent people would agree that we need a better system, but as flawed humans we're thus far incapable of creating such a society without killing off freedom and diversity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.