Is that so? How long have you spent using it?
Required for what? They aren't required to just use it as a laptop. Dongles are optional to the extent you want to use your legacy peripherals.
Is that so? How long have you spent using it?
Standard Apple pricing. Apple has always been priced high.
There are function keys.
Yep. Same as every other comparable laptop of similar weight, size, and battery life.
You know, as someone who uses laptops on his lap, I tend to prefer my laptops not burn my thighs. Also, I do occasionally hold my laptop up while using it. And now that you've got me thinking about it, I spend most of my time carrying it, holding it, or sitting with it on my lap. I almost never use it sitting on a table, desk, or anything of that sort.Nope. I have no idea what Intels roadmap has. I don't shop in their "Intel Weekly" catalog either. All I know is component manufactures have a wide variety to meet lots of different needs.
Maybe if Apple didn't have this insane desire to think their laptops to be air light, not like you or I hold up a laptop while using it, they could have a higher heat/watt envelope to put in Intel's higher level chips that don't have the 16GB limitation.
Let's be honest. Apple's irrational desire for thinness, therefore light weight, has compromised many aspects of what majority of people would consider a pro premium product. Heck, not even pro premium, just a stinking laptop in general.
Think of it this way, in what way would adding a pound or quarter inch of height compromise a device that is almost always sitting upon a fixed platform, ie a desk? None unless your surface/desk is that unstable that a pound will cause a structural failure. Therefore, you are left to conclude that the desire is purely aesthetic in nature which has caused a compromise in features of what is priced at as a high end laptop.
I've got a 2008 model (NOT MacBook, a desktop model) that is still going fine - after I replaced the graphic card. I cannot replace it in all good faith with a model that has not been updated in 3 years. Why would I spend money for a used 3-to-6-year-old model? Apple needs to update its line of desktop computers.Yeah really, I've got some 2011 machines running just fine...
5 years has always been Apple's standard cutoff for support, so this is nothing new. Nobody made a big deal about this previously.
Funny how you don't provide excuses for WHY this is Apple disrespecting customers. 5-7 years in technology, especially with RAM and SSD developments in the last five years, makes for a huge difference in computer performance and software development. And, like many posters here said, the reason the 2011 MBP are here likely are because of the GPU failure warranty running out after December, so timing this with that makes sense.2011 MPB with the Sandybridge processors are still plenty fast, but this is just more evidence that Apple doesn't respect consumers.
I expect excuses for this though.
iPhone 7 is a legacy peripheral? Sad.
iPhone 7 is a legacy peripheral? Sad.
I think it's unlikely these models will be getting the next year's macOS upgrade. And I think that's reasonable. If people want to be taking advantage of all the great features and innovations in the newest versions of macOS then they really need to help support Apple by buying new systems. 5 years is long enough.
Ok. You work, I assume. I also assume you've got a savings account and retirement. I also assume those are non-zero. Therefore, following your logic, we should stop paying you above your minimum requirement of survival, right? You stated that exact thing above - you have more money than you need, so why give you more?1) They have billions to spare and don't need help!
2) They have to listen a little better to what people want and do with their machines.
There once was a guy who kind of knew (and was mostly correct) and then pushed
the Apple users into that direction.
But, that person with a vision is no longer at Apple.
The current crop of executives claims to be courageous, but are far from it.
Sorry, can't support Apple at the moment.
They get my money again when they deserve it.
Funny how you don't provide excuses for WHY this is Apple disrespecting customers. 5-7 years in technology, especially with RAM and SSD developments in the last five years, makes for a huge difference in computer performance and software development. And, like many posters here said, the reason the 2011 MBP are here likely are because of the GPU failure warranty running out after December, so timing this with that makes sense.
I love Tim, he's a number cruncher, but get somebody with a vision for the product development in there. Ivy seems to have kicked the bucket somehow.I have an early 2011 15" MBP. I have yet to find a worthy replacement worth my money. Apple, this is a problem. I waited all this time to have the following:
Let's get Tim out of there. Please. Seriously.
- Weak, under-powered machine
- Dongles are required
- Gimmicky Touchbar
- $2,400 Starting Price
- No Function Keys
- 16gb RAM cap
Same, with the same laptop. But it's well within Apple's rights to stop seeding software, offering repairs and etc. because they own the software and original hardware parts. We can go to third parties, if we want, but Apple as a business has this right, as do every business.I recently upgraded my late 2011 MBP with a 1TB SSD and my RAM to 16GB. I'll replace the battery soon.
I suppose this is why Apple has made all of their new machines non-upgradable. No money to make when my 2011 MBP is running perfectly fine.
Outside of having a non-retina display, which I really don't care about since I'm using an external monitor, I have no reason to buy a new Mac anytime soon. Apple knows this.
Apple is making the 2011 Pro MacBooks obsolete because of the GPU failures that they don't wan't to deal with. That's why the 13 inch 2011 (and 2010 and even 2009) models aren't being made obsolete as well.
The hard drive is a pretty easy upgrade to do yourself, even in the iMacs of that generation. If the drive goes bad on you again, I'd look into that. The hardest part is just getting the display out and back in, but as long as you've got a compatible drive and the ifixit kit (~$50), you could probably do it.well during the 2000s 5 years were a long time for computers. Nowadays the improvements don't feel nearly as drastic as before. My mid 2010 low end iMac still runs perfectly smooth with the latest osx. However, it had some hardware failures that were due to the fact that Apple used crappy hard drives in this model. Glad I again had it replaced just a couple months ago, but next time the hdd fails it is going to be so expensive that I probably have to throw away the whole thing.
I'd actually be willing to bet that all of these machines will receive the 2017 OS update. In fact, I'd expect the 2011 models to receive those yearly updates for another two or three years.Why not? Apple have already written the drivers for all of the hardware in these older laptops. Those same drivers would continue to work with the next macOS upgrade. The reason you won’t be allowed to run the next macOS has nothing to do with OS development cost or any technical limitations (like when 32-bit instructions were dropped). It is nothing more than Apple blacklisting older hardware in an attempt to force people to buy new machines.
Might as well put the entire computer product line on the list now. That would be a more honest way to warn people not to buy their products as they are all being discontinued at an alarming pace.
I think you have an issue with reading comprehension. I never once insisted that Apple should "make new parts". I said:As for being green, I agree that the new Macbook Pros with soldered everything are not green. No debate there. But that's not what you said initially. You also insisted that continuing to make new parts for old devices would be green. That is wrong, and that is what I took issue with.
The 2011 models will probably just be classified as vintage, which means a few more years of software support. The 2009 models may still be eligible for software updates as well, considering my 2007 iMac is still getting security patches on El Cap (just missed qualifying for the Sierra update). So I wouldn't write off the software world just yet.
We're in a period of a different kind of development. Right now, streamlining (the size and temperature of) the current/slight improvements on hardware and the display are the two biggest changes. Anyone using a 2011 laptop, given the chance to use a 2016 MBP, won't ever go back to that low resolution junk screen.I think it's because, previously, the machines were actually falling behind in performance. That is no longer the case to the same extent. Allow me to explain.
The top-end 2016 MBP has a multicore Geekbench score of 13294 and a single core score of 4235.
The top-end 2011 MBP has a multicore Geekbench score of 8218 and single core score of 3076.
There is a difference but not as much as there used to be. For instance, the oldest score I could find on their current benchmark chart is the 2007 MBP. It has a multicore score of 2179 and a single core score of 1285.
So in four years from mid (June) 2007 to early (Feb) 2011 (1360 days) we had a 277.15% increase in multicore and 139.38% increase in single core. From early 2011 (Feb) to late (Oct) 2016 (2072 days) we had a 61.77% increase in multicore and a 37.68% increase in single core. So over a period that was 52.35% longer, we had a roughly 77.71% drop in expected performance increases over the previous period for multicore and 72.97% drop for single core.
Hopefully I got all that math straight as I'm more of the creative type. Either way you guys can see the numbers haven't changed as dramatically from one period to the next.
There have been other advances, such as graphics capabilities, but since it's a non-retina display, I don't see that being as big of an issue aside from some Open CL specific issues. The SSDs have also gotten a lot faster, but considering we put up with HDDs for decades that barely got any faster, and Apple is still shipping their 21" iMacs with 5400rpm drives (LOL), I don't see that as an issue holding things back.
As I said in my earlier comment, we're entering this weird period of our machines not really getting much faster and yet we still need to buy new ones for some reason. It's not a problem unique to Apple and why I think Apple wants to get more into the hardware game on the Mac. The iPhone gets much faster every year because of Apple's team of engineers. The competition can't even beat the 6s with the A9 for crying out loud.
Wrong.
![]()
Proof they're getting "humiliated"...? Just because someone has a different valid opinion than yours doesn't immediately make them a blind apologist. If anything, you're the blind Apple complainer.This type of apologist attitude is the reason why Apple is getting humiliated both in sales and overall customer satisfaction. It's as if you think people's very valid complaints of Apple don't matter.
Man. You can predict the future? Why are you wasting time here instead of with the lottery or stock market?Yeah, the lack of numbers cuz you know Apple won't share anything. It's only going to get worse in the coming months seeing how much of a RIP OFF the new MacBooks are and absolutely nothing worthy of purchasing on the desktop end.
It's going to be bye-bye to Apple for a lot of people. Get used to it.
If you've got an early 2011 MBP it's worth getting the battery replaced by Apple now - even if it doesn't need it.
Because once it's become Vintage the only option is to try and find some dodgy third party one. Endless hassle as I found to my cost...