Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sounds like you've never owned one.

Wrong.

bJ13BKn.png
 
Is that so? How long have you spent using it?


Required for what? They aren't required to just use it as a laptop. Dongles are optional to the extent you want to use your legacy peripherals.


Is that so? How long have you spent using it?


Standard Apple pricing. Apple has always been priced high.


There are function keys.


Yep. Same as every other comparable laptop of similar weight, size, and battery life.

iPhone 7 is a legacy peripheral? Sad.
 
If you've got an early 2011 MBP it's worth getting the battery replaced by Apple now - even if it doesn't need it.

Because once it's become Vintage the only option is to try and find some dodgy third party one. Endless hassle as I found to my cost...
 
Nope. I have no idea what Intels roadmap has. I don't shop in their "Intel Weekly" catalog either. All I know is component manufactures have a wide variety to meet lots of different needs.

Maybe if Apple didn't have this insane desire to think their laptops to be air light, not like you or I hold up a laptop while using it, they could have a higher heat/watt envelope to put in Intel's higher level chips that don't have the 16GB limitation.

Let's be honest. Apple's irrational desire for thinness, therefore light weight, has compromised many aspects of what majority of people would consider a pro premium product. Heck, not even pro premium, just a stinking laptop in general.

Think of it this way, in what way would adding a pound or quarter inch of height compromise a device that is almost always sitting upon a fixed platform, ie a desk? None unless your surface/desk is that unstable that a pound will cause a structural failure. Therefore, you are left to conclude that the desire is purely aesthetic in nature which has caused a compromise in features of what is priced at as a high end laptop.
You know, as someone who uses laptops on his lap, I tend to prefer my laptops not burn my thighs. Also, I do occasionally hold my laptop up while using it. And now that you've got me thinking about it, I spend most of my time carrying it, holding it, or sitting with it on my lap. I almost never use it sitting on a table, desk, or anything of that sort.

So you're argument just justified Apple's decisions for my use case pretty soundly. Guess that's why I'm not upset with the choices they made.
 
Yeah really, I've got some 2011 machines running just fine...
I've got a 2008 model (NOT MacBook, a desktop model) that is still going fine - after I replaced the graphic card. I cannot replace it in all good faith with a model that has not been updated in 3 years. Why would I spend money for a used 3-to-6-year-old model? Apple needs to update its line of desktop computers.

Where are the numerical identifiers for those models?
 
5 years has always been Apple's standard cutoff for support, so this is nothing new. Nobody made a big deal about this previously.

well during the 2000s 5 years were a long time for computers. Nowadays the improvements don't feel nearly as drastic as before. My mid 2010 low end iMac still runs perfectly smooth with the latest osx. However, it had some hardware failures that were due to the fact that Apple used crappy hard drives in this model. Glad I again had it replaced just a couple months ago, but next time the hdd fails it is going to be so expensive that I probably have to throw away the whole thing.


Edit: Also those machines are very expensive. I paid more than 1600 Euros for mine (with Apple Care I think, but after student discount). So basically in the past 6 years I paid more than 20 Euros a month for my computer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Stella
2011 MPB with the Sandybridge processors are still plenty fast, but this is just more evidence that Apple doesn't respect consumers.

I expect excuses for this though.
Funny how you don't provide excuses for WHY this is Apple disrespecting customers. 5-7 years in technology, especially with RAM and SSD developments in the last five years, makes for a huge difference in computer performance and software development. And, like many posters here said, the reason the 2011 MBP are here likely are because of the GPU failure warranty running out after December, so timing this with that makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TiquanS
I think it's unlikely these models will be getting the next year's macOS upgrade. And I think that's reasonable. If people want to be taking advantage of all the great features and innovations in the newest versions of macOS then they really need to help support Apple by buying new systems. 5 years is long enough.

Why not? Apple have already written the drivers for all of the hardware in these older laptops. Those same drivers would continue to work with the next macOS upgrade. The reason you won’t be allowed to run the next macOS has nothing to do with OS development cost or any technical limitations (like when 32-bit instructions were dropped). It is nothing more than Apple blacklisting older hardware in an attempt to force people to buy new machines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idunn
1) They have billions to spare and don't need help!
2) They have to listen a little better to what people want and do with their machines.

There once was a guy who kind of knew (and was mostly correct) and then pushed
the Apple users into that direction.
But, that person with a vision is no longer at Apple.

The current crop of executives claims to be courageous, but are far from it.

Sorry, can't support Apple at the moment.

They get my money again when they deserve it.
Ok. You work, I assume. I also assume you've got a savings account and retirement. I also assume those are non-zero. Therefore, following your logic, we should stop paying you above your minimum requirement of survival, right? You stated that exact thing above - you have more money than you need, so why give you more?

Smh
 
That's the official list. The inofficial list has the following formula:

(currentyear)-2=obsolete through update.
 
Funny how you don't provide excuses for WHY this is Apple disrespecting customers. 5-7 years in technology, especially with RAM and SSD developments in the last five years, makes for a huge difference in computer performance and software development. And, like many posters here said, the reason the 2011 MBP are here likely are because of the GPU failure warranty running out after December, so timing this with that makes sense.

2011 MBP can have 16gb and a SATA III SSD drive. So... it's close to being on par with the new MacBooks. I just rendered your argument moot.
 
I have an early 2011 15" MBP. I have yet to find a worthy replacement worth my money. Apple, this is a problem. I waited all this time to have the following:
  • Weak, under-powered machine
  • Dongles are required
  • Gimmicky Touchbar
  • $2,400 Starting Price
  • No Function Keys
  • 16gb RAM cap
Let's get Tim out of there. Please. Seriously.
I love Tim, he's a number cruncher, but get somebody with a vision for the product development in there. Ivy seems to have kicked the bucket somehow.

Bring back Forstall. Apple does seem to need someone who's focused - and not always loved, but get's the job done. (Let's not talk about Maps, though... But everyone's allowed to make one mistake, right?)
 
I recently upgraded my late 2011 MBP with a 1TB SSD and my RAM to 16GB. I'll replace the battery soon.

I suppose this is why Apple has made all of their new machines non-upgradable. No money to make when my 2011 MBP is running perfectly fine.

Outside of having a non-retina display, which I really don't care about since I'm using an external monitor, I have no reason to buy a new Mac anytime soon. Apple knows this.
Same, with the same laptop. But it's well within Apple's rights to stop seeding software, offering repairs and etc. because they own the software and original hardware parts. We can go to third parties, if we want, but Apple as a business has this right, as do every business.
 
Apple is making the 2011 Pro MacBooks obsolete because of the GPU failures that they don't wan't to deal with. That's why the 13 inch 2011 (and 2010 and even 2009) models aren't being made obsolete as well.

I agree with Apple wanting to wash their hands of the GPU issue. I've had the logic board replaced twice in my early 2011 MBP. The first time they did it when the replacement program was announced. The second time I had to argue with the manager before they would fix it again under that program. I dare not run anything graphics intensive because it will fail again within a year.
 
well during the 2000s 5 years were a long time for computers. Nowadays the improvements don't feel nearly as drastic as before. My mid 2010 low end iMac still runs perfectly smooth with the latest osx. However, it had some hardware failures that were due to the fact that Apple used crappy hard drives in this model. Glad I again had it replaced just a couple months ago, but next time the hdd fails it is going to be so expensive that I probably have to throw away the whole thing.
The hard drive is a pretty easy upgrade to do yourself, even in the iMacs of that generation. If the drive goes bad on you again, I'd look into that. The hardest part is just getting the display out and back in, but as long as you've got a compatible drive and the ifixit kit (~$50), you could probably do it.
[doublepost=1480440993][/doublepost]
Why not? Apple have already written the drivers for all of the hardware in these older laptops. Those same drivers would continue to work with the next macOS upgrade. The reason you won’t be allowed to run the next macOS has nothing to do with OS development cost or any technical limitations (like when 32-bit instructions were dropped). It is nothing more than Apple blacklisting older hardware in an attempt to force people to buy new machines.
I'd actually be willing to bet that all of these machines will receive the 2017 OS update. In fact, I'd expect the 2011 models to receive those yearly updates for another two or three years.
 
Might as well put the entire computer product line on the list now. That would be a more honest way to warn people not to buy their products as they are all being discontinued at an alarming pace.

5-7 years in todays hectic world is not an alarming pace.

People would still complain if it was a 10 year spread, especially when all their machines still work.

Sometimes even software gets pulled. I was still using a G4 iMac and Microsoft pulled all updates for MS Office 2004. Not even legacy storing websites have them.

All of that updating or deciding what is legacy and what not is personal preference.

I drive my cars literally into the ground . Last one just got totaled at 223,000 miles and I would have kept driving it. Use an old PC with Windows XP, no longer supported to make box labels wit UPC codes.

We can't ask manufacturers to make old mother boards or stock parts forever, just in case a few machines MAY break down in the future.

As for the posters lamenting about Apple not being green: You can recycle any Apple product through their website and over the years they have reduced the use of environmentally questionable material.(Don't remember if they also take PCs)

But, I will say that making parts non upgradeable cuts down on the life span of ALL machines.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: macTW
As for being green, I agree that the new Macbook Pros with soldered everything are not green. No debate there. But that's not what you said initially. You also insisted that continuing to make new parts for old devices would be green. That is wrong, and that is what I took issue with.
I think you have an issue with reading comprehension. I never once insisted that Apple should "make new parts". I said:

"Also, with all the graphics card issues that have reared up (they replaced mine just last year on a mid-2011 MBP), it would be nice to be able to pay for it to get fixed if it gets messed up again."

I did not even mention the types of parts they should use. If they want to use refurbished parts, I am fine with that. My main point is that the graphics cards in these models have had ongoing issues and they should at least continue to repair them.

It is what I said initially:

" Regardless of whether it has been their policy in the past, they like to brag about their solar panels these days while at the same time obsoleting 5 to 7 year old computers that still run fine and also making their new computers nearly impossible to repair. As someone said, it is wasteful and far from being a "green" company that cares."

So yeah, I did mention it on the outset.
 
The 2011 models will probably just be classified as vintage, which means a few more years of software support. The 2009 models may still be eligible for software updates as well, considering my 2007 iMac is still getting security patches on El Cap (just missed qualifying for the Sierra update). So I wouldn't write off the software world just yet.

Oh, i know it's not cut and dry that all of the legacy things get software support removed right away, but there have been a few notable times it has happened.

Recalling in particular the some 2009-2011's that were shipped using 32bit EFI's, despite the rest of the hardware being 64bit. Apple immediately made those devices "legacy" in 2013 and then released the next OSx version without support for the 32bit EFI's. thus blocking any of these devices from upgrading OS's. it was a software limitation as Apple decided to just pull their 32bit EFI code out of the OS, that was already there.

I know it's a one off, but it has to be on the back of your mind when your device gets moved to that obsolete/legacy list
 
  • Like
Reactions: idunn
I think it's because, previously, the machines were actually falling behind in performance. That is no longer the case to the same extent. Allow me to explain.

The top-end 2016 MBP has a multicore Geekbench score of 13294 and a single core score of 4235.

The top-end 2011 MBP has a multicore Geekbench score of 8218 and single core score of 3076.

There is a difference but not as much as there used to be. For instance, the oldest score I could find on their current benchmark chart is the 2007 MBP. It has a multicore score of 2179 and a single core score of 1285.

So in four years from mid (June) 2007 to early (Feb) 2011 (1360 days) we had a 277.15% increase in multicore and 139.38% increase in single core. From early 2011 (Feb) to late (Oct) 2016 (2072 days) we had a 61.77% increase in multicore and a 37.68% increase in single core. So over a period that was 52.35% longer, we had a roughly 77.71% drop in expected performance increases over the previous period for multicore and 72.97% drop for single core.

Hopefully I got all that math straight as I'm more of the creative type. Either way you guys can see the numbers haven't changed as dramatically from one period to the next.

There have been other advances, such as graphics capabilities, but since it's a non-retina display, I don't see that being as big of an issue aside from some Open CL specific issues. The SSDs have also gotten a lot faster, but considering we put up with HDDs for decades that barely got any faster, and Apple is still shipping their 21" iMacs with 5400rpm drives (LOL), I don't see that as an issue holding things back.

As I said in my earlier comment, we're entering this weird period of our machines not really getting much faster and yet we still need to buy new ones for some reason. It's not a problem unique to Apple and why I think Apple wants to get more into the hardware game on the Mac. The iPhone gets much faster every year because of Apple's team of engineers. The competition can't even beat the 6s with the A9 for crying out loud.
We're in a period of a different kind of development. Right now, streamlining (the size and temperature of) the current/slight improvements on hardware and the display are the two biggest changes. Anyone using a 2011 laptop, given the chance to use a 2016 MBP, won't ever go back to that low resolution junk screen.
 


From your previous post, #11:

"Why not just go the whole way and make everything outside the newly updated macbooks obsolete?
Since that's exactly what they are in todays world."


Perhaps you can explain how your pre 2016 MBP (a 2013), or those being used by millions of others everyday, are obsolete?
 
Last edited:
This type of apologist attitude is the reason why Apple is getting humiliated both in sales and overall customer satisfaction. It's as if you think people's very valid complaints of Apple don't matter.
Proof they're getting "humiliated"...? Just because someone has a different valid opinion than yours doesn't immediately make them a blind apologist. If anything, you're the blind Apple complainer.
[doublepost=1480441338][/doublepost]
Yeah, the lack of numbers cuz you know Apple won't share anything. It's only going to get worse in the coming months seeing how much of a RIP OFF the new MacBooks are and absolutely nothing worthy of purchasing on the desktop end.

It's going to be bye-bye to Apple for a lot of people. Get used to it.
Man. You can predict the future? Why are you wasting time here instead of with the lottery or stock market?
 
If you've got an early 2011 MBP it's worth getting the battery replaced by Apple now - even if it doesn't need it.

Because once it's become Vintage the only option is to try and find some dodgy third party one. Endless hassle as I found to my cost...

For the 13" also?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.