Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Because it makes sense-

A battery shouldn't effect performance, it should effect longevity.

It especially shouldn't effect performance to a point where a consumer buys a new phone.

It shouldn't effect performance to a point where the device functions at a speed that's less than what it was advertised as.

Simply, they can't go from shouting from every media outlet every September about how fast their new phones are, and then in a really short amount of time reduce that speed, just because a user bought and used the device and by doing so, degraded the battery.
 
I don't want to change my battery, my battery was new a few months ago. 79 out of 500 cycles. And STILL the performance has gone down the drain on my 6 plus with iOS11. This is ********, Apple!
Weird. My 6+ works great still.
 

That's the usual way it's done. No other device in my memory has throttled performance to around 50% on a nominally full battery and external power due to system health data the user of that device can't check.

If Apple wanted to change the accepted conventions at least make it a user selectable option. Which they are doing. Belatedly. After getting caught out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idunn
Would you say the same if iPhones started shutting down in one month? The same logic would apply. Yes battery degrades but apparently in some phone (those with skimped batteries) they degrade faster than in other devices. Having skimped on the battery size in a first place Apple should compensate now by providing free replacements.
One month is still under warranty. Again why should Apple provide free batteries out of warranty? I’ve owned a 4S, 5, 5S, 6, 6S, 7 and now an X and have never had battery issues. My mother is using a hand me down iPhone 6 from me and has no battery issues. But if she did I wouldn’t expect Apple to replace it for free as the phone is no longer under warranty.
 
Because it makes sense-

A battery shouldn't effect performance, it should effect longevity.

It especially shouldn't effect performance to a point where a consumer buys a new phone.

It shouldn't effect performance to a point where the device functions at a speed that's less than what it was advertised as.

Simply, they can't go from shouting from every media outlet every September about how fast their new phones are, and then in a really short amount of time reduce that speed, just because a user bought and used the device and by doing so, degraded the battery.

That’s a lot of “should.” For a lot of people, they’d prefer that they can keep making calls and using the device all day, even if it means less performance playing games or launching apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flofixer and Nor10
Because a degrading battery should result in a lower amount of time that I can use a phone, not how fast the phone is when it's on.

Agreed; My 6 has been working just fine...Not so much concerned about the battery. installed 11 os clean installed...Phone doesn't support basic functions; find a contact, create an email, create a text, select voicemail, dial a number. Completely crapped 11 OS. Apple is blaming battery? Never before have they done this. This is a complete SHAM and SCAM on lazy software coding to drive sales...We can't even trade our phones in now with any value...Apple has screwed the entire Apple EcoSystem...Lazy over compensated, overly policitical and don't have their focus on the ball. Steve is turning in his grave and would fire all of them. what does it matter that Apple has 200B in the bank if they screw over their customers?
 
Sorry, Not Good Enough.

They should allow the rollback to the last "fit for purpose" version of an OS for a particular phone. It's not just a matter of a battery's performance, it's a matter of making otherwise good phone PREMATURELY no longer usable as advertised.
 
All you pitchforkers should settle down now.

I don't even believe Apple needed to do this, but they decided it was the right thing to do to show customers they are actually NOT trying to screw with them.

Apple is a great company.

That's inaccurate characterization. It's a dispute between Apple shareholders like you and consumers. While I am sorry that you are going to lose a few bucks on your investment, please stop telling the consumers how great your company is when they screw up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and Ladybug
That’s a lot of “should.” For a lot of people, they’d prefer that they can keep making calls and using the device all day, even if it means less performance playing games or launching apps.

What if you needed that performance to do your job and were ok with the expectation of having to have a charger close by anyway? It's not like these batteries were great to begin with.

It's not up to Apple to make that choice, they can't sell me one thing one day, push bits that degrade performance, and then ask me for $29 to make it all better, temporarily.

They should at least let me pick to burn through the battery if I'd like.
 
Sorry, Not Good Enough.

They should allow the rollback to the last "fit for purpose" version of an OS for a particular phone. It's not just a matter of a battery's performance, it's a matter of making otherwise good phone PREMATURELY no longer usable as advertised.
I presume you’ll enjoy your speedy home button responsiveness when bugs in the old version of the OS result in all your data being pwnd by some guy in Belarus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer1440
What annoys me about this and other things like it is that it sets the precedent that an uninformed public can develop an "outcry" over anything get a result out of Apple. Real shame. The public didn't deserve this level of compromise from Apple. Intelligent CPU management of a device powered by lithium-ion battery is expected and appropriate, and really no one's business besides the engineers.

Apple are still making a bit of coin selling for 29 bucks. Nothing wrong with being charged a fairer price for something so simple and intrinsic to the fair use of an item you have bought
 
  • Like
Reactions: RecentlyConverted
Are people not aware that batteries degrade overtime? Apple tries to implement a "fix" to INCREASE usage of your personal device and somehow people interpret it as Apple being devious.

What seems to be the chief complaint in most of these posts, is Apple's failure to be transparent on the issue(which i agree with). With all of what the iphone is capable of, we have to assume there is a considerable amount of strain on the battery.

I wonder how much of Apple's obsession with making things thinner coupled with increased features play into the batteries longevity.
 
This whole issue was only ever a communication and perception issue because slowing the CPU a bit is always preferable to a sudden shutdown.
But that is ********. My iPhone 6 plus is nearly brand new. Its battery is on 79 of 500 cycles. Still the performance is REALLY piss poor with the iOS 11 update. So Apple should stop the lies about "phones with old batteries". This is obviously them wanting me to buy a new iPhone.
 
What annoys me about this and other things like it is that it sets the precedent that an uninformed public can develop an "outcry" over anything get a result out of Apple. Real shame. The public didn't deserve this level of compromise from Apple. Intelligent CPU management of a device powered by lithium-ion battery is expected and appropriate, and really no one's business besides the engineers.

Yes the public, the people who worked part of their life away for money, and then chose to use that money (representing a portion of their life on earth) to buy a phone from Apple, are now terrorists, forcing Apple to cede something to them, when really Papa Apple knows what's best for them. Unbelievable.
 
What if you needed that performance to do your job and were ok with the expectation of having to have a charger close by anyway? It's not like these batteries were great to begin with.

It's not up to Apple to make that choice, they can't sell me one thing one day, push bits that degrade performance, and then ask me for $29 to make it all better, temporarily.

They should at least let me pick to burn through the battery if I'd like.

Of course it’s up to Apple to make that choice. That’s why Enginering is. Choosing. They choose a battery size that’s a trade off between longevity and weight and thickness. They choose a screen resolution that’s a trade off. They choose how many speakers to put in and how big to make them. They choose what buttons to put on the device. They choose a clock rate for the cpu.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artfossil
Well maybe 10.2.1 slowed it down and I just didn't notice, but I doubt it. Nevertheless, my iPhone worked perfectly until Apple's gimpware was installed. There's more to this than Apple's official explanation.


Apple has been doing this from the beginning of iPhone. Yes, I am talking about the original iPhone. If they don't slow down for battery-related reason, they slow down for other reasons.

iOS 11 was simply too naked.

Good job, Apple. You brought this to yourself.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.