I already have an iPhone X but if this also slows down after just one year I won’t be buying another one.
Pretty stale comment btw.
I wouldn’t buy another either I would get the iPhone X plus or iPhone Xs or whatever is next
I already have an iPhone X but if this also slows down after just one year I won’t be buying another one.
Pretty stale comment btw.
Why?
Weird. My 6+ works great still.I don't want to change my battery, my battery was new a few months ago. 79 out of 500 cycles. And STILL the performance has gone down the drain on my 6 plus with iOS11. This is ********, Apple!
Why?
One month is still under warranty. Again why should Apple provide free batteries out of warranty? I’ve owned a 4S, 5, 5S, 6, 6S, 7 and now an X and have never had battery issues. My mother is using a hand me down iPhone 6 from me and has no battery issues. But if she did I wouldn’t expect Apple to replace it for free as the phone is no longer under warranty.Would you say the same if iPhones started shutting down in one month? The same logic would apply. Yes battery degrades but apparently in some phone (those with skimped batteries) they degrade faster than in other devices. Having skimped on the battery size in a first place Apple should compensate now by providing free replacements.
Because it makes sense-
A battery shouldn't effect performance, it should effect longevity.
It especially shouldn't effect performance to a point where a consumer buys a new phone.
It shouldn't effect performance to a point where the device functions at a speed that's less than what it was advertised as.
Simply, they can't go from shouting from every media outlet every September about how fast their new phones are, and then in a really short amount of time reduce that speed, just because a user bought and used the device and by doing so, degraded the battery.
Because a degrading battery should result in a lower amount of time that I can use a phone, not how fast the phone is when it's on.
What does that have to do with Apple providing free batteries out of warranty?Because a degrading battery should result in a lower amount of time that I can use a phone, not how fast the phone is when it's on.
All you pitchforkers should settle down now.
I don't even believe Apple needed to do this, but they decided it was the right thing to do to show customers they are actually NOT trying to screw with them.
Apple is a great company.
That’s a lot of “should.” For a lot of people, they’d prefer that they can keep making calls and using the device all day, even if it means less performance playing games or launching apps.
I presume you’ll enjoy your speedy home button responsiveness when bugs in the old version of the OS result in all your data being pwnd by some guy in Belarus.Sorry, Not Good Enough.
They should allow the rollback to the last "fit for purpose" version of an OS for a particular phone. It's not just a matter of a battery's performance, it's a matter of making otherwise good phone PREMATURELY no longer usable as advertised.
Why would Apple replace your battery if your battery is fine?![]()
What annoys me about this and other things like it is that it sets the precedent that an uninformed public can develop an "outcry" over anything get a result out of Apple. Real shame. The public didn't deserve this level of compromise from Apple. Intelligent CPU management of a device powered by lithium-ion battery is expected and appropriate, and really no one's business besides the engineers.
Well those phones just slow down all by themselves.
When did they deny?
But that is ********. My iPhone 6 plus is nearly brand new. Its battery is on 79 of 500 cycles. Still the performance is REALLY piss poor with the iOS 11 update. So Apple should stop the lies about "phones with old batteries". This is obviously them wanting me to buy a new iPhone.This whole issue was only ever a communication and perception issue because slowing the CPU a bit is always preferable to a sudden shutdown.
What annoys me about this and other things like it is that it sets the precedent that an uninformed public can develop an "outcry" over anything get a result out of Apple. Real shame. The public didn't deserve this level of compromise from Apple. Intelligent CPU management of a device powered by lithium-ion battery is expected and appropriate, and really no one's business besides the engineers.
What if you needed that performance to do your job and were ok with the expectation of having to have a charger close by anyway? It's not like these batteries were great to begin with.
It's not up to Apple to make that choice, they can't sell me one thing one day, push bits that degrade performance, and then ask me for $29 to make it all better, temporarily.
They should at least let me pick to burn through the battery if I'd like.
Warranty is not the only document regulating device replacements. There are laws like Lemon Law. Those apply beyond the warranty. And perhaps Apple should be forced to recall these lemon phones.What does that have to do with Apple providing free batteries out of warranty?
Well maybe 10.2.1 slowed it down and I just didn't notice, but I doubt it. Nevertheless, my iPhone worked perfectly until Apple's gimpware was installed. There's more to this than Apple's official explanation.