This is a symptom of a much bigger problem. The Digital Divide is back and looming larger than ever, and that’s a bad, bad thing.
Truly useful features (for the vast majority of users) have plateaued in personal computing, reaching their peak about 5 years ago. Facial recognition and slightly better cameras aren’t worth a $1,200 upgrade, so a sharply rising number of people are holding onto their hardware longer. This is causing a major problem with obsolescence schedules.
Skeptics who argue the obsolescence is planned might be wrong, but if it walks like a duck... we have seen devices become more fragile and intentionally slowed down so does it really matter if it’s planned? Would the government care if it were? The point is, we don’t have a choice. If we want to continue with digital lives, we must buy on their schedule, even if our hardware is perfectly useable for our purposes.
Companies like Apple and Comcast have us hooked and we have to pay for our fix. The government still claims the Internet isn’t a utility (see the latest net neutrality ruling for a good example). And yet, I challenge any of you to live without it.
I’m trying that now and it’s not going well. Instead of updating my good old now unsupported but perfectly capable (for even above average use) MBP to a new one with questionable value given the price, I decided to try using just my iPhone 6 and very fast mobile connection for a while. Apple still won’t let me update my iOS over this connection, so I’m increasingly at risk, which forces me to consider paying Comcast again (no other choice of isp), which then will subject me to throttled speeds at their whim and force me to upgrade home networking hardware. Tethering doesn’t help either since some sites apparently won’t function the same over a mobile connection (despite its 30Mbps download and 20Mbps upload speeds), and besides the no longer updatable MBP is getting risky to use.
The only choice I appear to have is to pay whatever they ask or go non-digital. No email, brick banks, etc... Is this realistic? With every year that passes it’s clearer the answer to this question is no, which means UNEQUIVOCALLY that digital life (i.e., the Internet and basic devices that access it) has become essential to life itself. As such, both industries require regulation on behalf of the government to protect us from having to buy new, overpriced products and services just to survive.
The greed and hubris in the tech industry now rivals any other in history. They’re worse than the Pharma Bro - at least he was only extorting a tiny percentage of the population. No, these guys (and it is almost only guys) are at more of a Borgia papal level of greed and control. And it now appears that for the foreseeable future, it’s only going to get worse.