Sorry folks, Headline in USA Today and Senator Rubio's comments got under my skin, I know this topic has been beaten to a pulp, at least Apple is going to improve their battery monitoring in the next iOS so we can all breath a little easier.
Fact. It's all over Wikipedia. No receipts needed.YES.
[doublepost=1514588451][/doublepost]
Is that a fact? We need receipts.
What's your point? I am disappointed in the extreme performance drop because of the battery and the design flaw that causes the touch IC to fail. Apple has been well aware of both and refused to do anything about it. I have taken extremely good care of my 6+ and I was counting on it to last me at least a year longer.Android phones also throttle the CPU. It's in their documentation.
0 insider information, what i'm saying is that optimising either for reliability or package size is a trivial industry decision, with trivial solutions.Insider information....?
Nobody except Apple knows what's inside.
That is blatantly false. Newer manufacturing process are significantly smaller and more efficient. Older processors suck a ton of juice. Not the newer ones.
0 insider information, what i'm saying is that optimising either for reliability or package size is a trivial industry decision, with trivial solutions.
Has there been any discussion on how iOS products also slow down noticeably in the two weeks to week before an iOS update is due to be released? The slowness continues to force the user into updating to hopefully resolve the speed/sluggish issue. After the iOS update surprise surprise the iOS unit works as it did before being slowed down.
Apple this afternoon addressed customer concerns about an ongoing controversy over power management features in older iPhones, pledging to introduce more detailed information about battery health and reducing the price of battery replacements for all of 2018.
In a letter explaining its policies, Apple apologizes for the misinformation that's been spread and says that it would never "intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades."
![]()
At issue is a power management feature that was initially introduced in iOS 10.2.1 in the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6s, which was implemented to prevent unexpected shutdowns due to high power draw peaks. Apple's lack of clarity about the feature has led to a number of lawsuits being filed in recent days claiming that Apple is purposefully slowing down older iPhones.
Apple explains the situation and the aging of batteries both in the letter and in a new support document.These power management features are implemented in the iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, and iPhone 7 Plus, and will be added to future iPhones as required. They kick in when the battery begins to degrade and can be fixed with a new battery.
Apple says it began to receive feedback this fall from customers who were seeing slower speeds, which it initially thought might be due to software updates and minor bugs in iOS 11, but it now believes the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older devices is at fault.
To allay customer concerns and address recent customer feedback, Apple says it will implement several changes.
- The price for out-of-warranty iPhone battery replacements is being dropped from $79 to $29, starting in late January and lasting through December 2018. Apple plans to provide more information on the price drop in the near future, but it will apply to anyone with an iPhone 6 or later whose battery needs to be replaced.
- In early 2018, an iOS update will introduce new features to give users more visibility into the health of their iPhone's battery, so they can clearly see whether the state of the battery is affecting performance.
Apple says its team is also always working on ways to make the user experience better, including how performance is managed to avoid unexpected shutdowns as batteries age.
Article Link: Apple to Offer $29 iPhone Battery Replacements, More Battery Health Info in iOS
Apple this afternoon addressed customer concerns about an ongoing controversy over power management features in older iPhones, pledging to introduce more detailed information about battery health and reducing the price of battery replacements for all of 2018.
In a letter explaining its policies, Apple apologizes for the misinformation that's been spread and says that it would never "intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades."
![]()
At issue is a power management feature that was initially introduced in iOS 10.2.1 in the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6s, which was implemented to prevent unexpected shutdowns due to high power draw peaks. Apple's lack of clarity about the feature has led to a number of lawsuits being filed in recent days claiming that Apple is purposefully slowing down older iPhones.
Apple explains the situation and the aging of batteries both in the letter and in a new support document.These power management features are implemented in the iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, and iPhone 7 Plus, and will be added to future iPhones as required. They kick in when the battery begins to degrade and can be fixed with a new battery.
Apple says it began to receive feedback this fall from customers who were seeing slower speeds, which it initially thought might be due to software updates and minor bugs in iOS 11, but it now believes the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older devices is at fault.
To allay customer concerns and address recent customer feedback, Apple says it will implement several changes.
- The price for out-of-warranty iPhone battery replacements is being dropped from $79 to $29, starting in late January and lasting through December 2018. Apple plans to provide more information on the price drop in the near future, but it will apply to anyone with an iPhone 6 or later whose battery needs to be replaced.
- In early 2018, an iOS update will introduce new features to give users more visibility into the health of their iPhone's battery, so they can clearly see whether the state of the battery is affecting performance.
Apple says its team is also always working on ways to make the user experience better, including how performance is managed to avoid unexpected shutdowns as batteries age.
Article Link: Apple to Offer $29 iPhone Battery Replacements, More Battery Health Info in iOS
Every post I quoted was in reference consumers not paying for a worn out battery. Not sure what you read here. I made no comment regarding Apple refusing to replace batteries either so again not sure what you mean there.You may want to do more reading into this issue. It's not just an Aging battery problem , if it was why are the 5S and prior models not suffering from these shutdowns ? Seems there might be a design flaw .... let's see .
No other manufacturer of electronic goods that I am aware of will refuse to replace your battery if your offer them money . Apple does
, you don't find this abnormal ? Given they also control the test ?
It's not about free batteries , it's about being allowed to give Apple $$$ and have the battery in the device we own changed . This big brother mentality is disgusting to be honest . They will not replace my battery by bend over backwards to sell me a new phone ....
What about battery replacements for iPhone 5? No mention of a iPhone 5 but my wife still uses one and I’m sure with a new battery it would still operate very effectively.
Apple this afternoon addressed customer concerns about an ongoing controversy over power management features in older iPhones, pledging to introduce more detailed information about battery health and reducing the price of battery replacements for all of 2018.
In a letter explaining its policies, Apple apologizes for the misinformation that's been spread and says that it would never "intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades."
![]()
At issue is a power management feature that was initially introduced in iOS 10.2.1 in the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6s, which was implemented to prevent unexpected shutdowns due to high power draw peaks. Apple's lack of clarity about the feature has led to a number of lawsuits being filed in recent days claiming that Apple is purposefully slowing down older iPhones.
Apple explains the situation and the aging of batteries both in the letter and in a new support document.These power management features are implemented in the iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, and iPhone 7 Plus, and will be added to future iPhones as required. They kick in when the battery begins to degrade and can be fixed with a new battery.
Apple says it began to receive feedback this fall from customers who were seeing slower speeds, which it initially thought might be due to software updates and minor bugs in iOS 11, but it now believes the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older devices is at fault.
To allay customer concerns and address recent customer feedback, Apple says it will implement several changes.
- The price for out-of-warranty iPhone battery replacements is being dropped from $79 to $29, starting in late January and lasting through December 2018. Apple plans to provide more information on the price drop in the near future, but it will apply to anyone with an iPhone 6 or later whose battery needs to be replaced.
- In early 2018, an iOS update will introduce new features to give users more visibility into the health of their iPhone's battery, so they can clearly see whether the state of the battery is affecting performance.
Apple says its team is also always working on ways to make the user experience better, including how performance is managed to avoid unexpected shutdowns as batteries age.
Article Link: Apple to Offer $29 iPhone Battery Replacements, More Battery Health Info in iOS
This opinion piece on Computerworld discusses the Apple media release on the scandal.
https://www.computerworld.com/artic...iasco-clear-and-not-in-the-way-it-wanted.html
Apple hasn't addressed those users who upgraded their iPhone 6s or SE, at a high cost, when a low cost battery replacement would have sped their phones back up. My conclusion on Apple's PR response is that it has put them in a worse position with those who bought new iPhones in 2017 due to their old ones slowing down because we're left wondering "why didn't Apple tell us this before"?
They are optimised for package size and not high draw that much is abundantly clear, for high draw package the iphone power requirement is minuscule and 500 cycle count target quite low.I don't dispute that, we just don't know the quality of the battery inside iPhones.
Hmm.This opinion piece on Computerworld discusses the Apple media release on the scandal.
https://www.computerworld.com/artic...iasco-clear-and-not-in-the-way-it-wanted.html
Apple hasn't addressed those users who upgraded their iPhone 6s or SE, at a high cost, when a low cost battery replacement would have sped their phones back up. My conclusion on Apple's PR response is that it has put them in a worse position with those who bought new iPhones in 2017 due to their old ones slowing down because we're left wondering "why didn't Apple tell us this before"?
I have other sources that say different.Fact. It's all over Wikipedia. No receipts needed.
The people who upgraded their phone now have a better model, with all the benefits of a newer phone. I think it’s hard to say that they got screwed when they now have a newer phone that is not only faster, but also has more features and functionality.
How do you put a price on the added utility that they received? Sure, they paid more, but it’s not like they didn’t get any benefits out of this arrangement. What is Apple supposed to do - refund them and let them keep the newer phone?
Thank you! I will check when they post more details. My SE is painfully slow since the ios update.The SE came out after the 6S, so therefore it is newer than the 6.
What annoys me about this and other things like it is that it sets the precedent that an uninformed public can develop an "outcry" over anything get a result out of Apple. Real shame. The public didn't deserve this level of compromise from Apple. Intelligent CPU management of a device powered by lithium-ion battery is expected and appropriate, and really no one's business besides the engineers.
Are you actually serious?
What is Apple supposed to do - refund them and let them keep the newer phone?
Apple this afternoon addressed customer concerns about an ongoing controversy over power management features in older iPhones, pledging to introduce more detailed information about battery health and reducing the price of battery replacements for all of 2018.
In a letter explaining its policies, Apple apologizes for the misinformation that's been spread and says that it would never "intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades."
![]()
At issue is a power management feature that was initially introduced in iOS 10.2.1 in the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6s, which was implemented to prevent unexpected shutdowns due to high power draw peaks. Apple's lack of clarity about the feature has led to a number of lawsuits being filed in recent days claiming that Apple is purposefully slowing down older iPhones.
Apple explains the situation and the aging of batteries both in the letter and in a new support document.These power management features are implemented in the iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, and iPhone 7 Plus, and will be added to future iPhones as required. They kick in when the battery begins to degrade and can be fixed with a new battery.
Apple says it began to receive feedback this fall from customers who were seeing slower speeds, which it initially thought might be due to software updates and minor bugs in iOS 11, but it now believes the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older devices is at fault.
To allay customer concerns and address recent customer feedback, Apple says it will implement several changes.
- The price for out-of-warranty iPhone battery replacements is being dropped from $79 to $29, starting in late January and lasting through December 2018. Apple plans to provide more information on the price drop in the near future, but it will apply to anyone with an iPhone 6 or later whose battery needs to be replaced.
- In early 2018, an iOS update will introduce new features to give users more visibility into the health of their iPhone's battery, so they can clearly see whether the state of the battery is affecting performance.
Apple says its team is also always working on ways to make the user experience better, including how performance is managed to avoid unexpected shutdowns as batteries age.
Article Link: Apple to Offer $29 iPhone Battery Replacements, More Battery Health Info in iOS
Yes.
You missed the point entirely. What about the users who enjoyed their iPhone 6/6S and WOULD NOT HAVE PAID THE MONEY to upgrade had they have known their device could be fixed by a simple $80 battery replacement?? Let’s be honest, other than photos, the new iPhones don’t do anything that different than the iPhone 6/6Plus. User experience is the same basically. I used my mother-in-law’s iPhone 6S Plus and was surprised by how quick the phone was still. Zero discernible difference in experience between the 8 Plus and 6S Plus other than camera. I’ve said many times in other threads, smartphones are at a point of diminishing returns. The only real gains will be made in software year to year.The people who upgraded their phone now have a better model, with all the benefits of a newer phone. I think it’s hard to say that they got screwed when they now have a newer phone that is not only faster, but also has more features and functionality.
How do you put a price on the added utility that they received? Sure, they paid more, but it’s not like they didn’t get any benefits out of this arrangement. What is Apple supposed to do - refund them and let them keep the newer phone?
That to me is a ridiculous proposition.
The aim of any compensation should be to ensure that the victim is at least in the same position as he was before the problem, not let him benefit or profit from it.
I see the rationale of being made to pay a nominal sum for a battery replacement. It keeps people honest and prevents every iPhone user from flooding the apple stores and requesting a battery replacement even when their phones don’t need one because “why not, it’s free”. Having to pay something means that only those who genuinely need a new battery will go to the Apple store to get one, keeping the crowds manageable.
The idea that they deserve to get a brand new iPhone, much less the latest model, out of this, is even more ludicrous.