Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Look at the flowers, iMac. Just keep looking at the flowers..."

God, I wish Apple would just let go of the iMac already. The all-in-one is such a dated concept at this point. A complete ground-up redesign of their consumer desktop offerings would be wonderful but I'm sure they found a way to make the new iMac paper-thin and have figured out how to remove more "unnecessary" features.

Going on a year now since my own iMac died... still haven't bought a new Mac. Still waiting for something worth buying. :mad:


Heh. It's not the iMac that bothers me so much as Apple's refusal to offer any other high end consumer desktop choice. The Mini is intentionally inadequate and the Mac Pro is what Apple's high end consumer desktop should be, except maybe smaller since it needs only an i7 with one consumer GPU.
 
What's going to set the Air apart from the Pro and the MacBook? It seems like they are all getting more and more similar. I still find it hard to believe in the continuance of the tripartite MacBook lineup.

And I guess no dGPU in the Pro then? :(
My guess:-
Lighter and Thinner than the Macbook Pro.
Cheaper than the Macbook. [no retina display to achieve this?]
 
Small production, boutique-like machines like the Pro are more easily kept secret.

My guess, we'll get a completely redesigned, humble-pied no-nonsense Mac Pro early next year.

Would be awesome but it would mean to admit the trashcan was a mistake and I really don't think they care enough to do that.
 
I agree.... I have been waiting three years now to upgrade and not even a mention.... what is going on ?

There was a big thread over on the Mac Pro forum started by someone who claimed Apple are building inventory of a new Mac Pro mini tower. Probably wishful thinking but a full redesign would explain the 3 year wait. If true, then Apple could be waiting on availability of a 5K SST USB-C display.
 
Normally I would totally agree. But what with the goofy rumors about a curved screen iPhone, design decisions that went on to become the emaciated MacBook, and the sad state of the MacPro... I am understandably nervous about future products. There appears to be nobody who asks if the design/features are fit for purpose. Just because it can be engineered doesn't mean it makes every product better.

Likewise, the handwringing over the rumored OLED touch strip is justified. We know where it will be and we know what the technology can do. Touchscreen makes a lot of sense on a device with limited real estate. They do not belong on a desktop or full-on notebook that has a physical keyboard. A physical keyboard + mouse/touchpad are faster, more precise, and where your hands are. Whatever settings that might vary between programs are more easily adjusted ON-SCREEN than looking away from the screen, hunting around the strip for the icon/virtual button, moving hand off keyboard/mouse/touchpad to tap virtual key. Likewise, why use extra power to run another screen that is at best only periodically needed. It will be also viewed at an oblique angle so it will not be as clear as a key would have been. It screams of gimmick.

Re the curved screen iPhone rumors... they said the same thing about the 6 and everybody survived that. I expect we'll see something pretty great that will not be anything like the Samsung Edge or whatever. I don't see a problem with the MacBook, or the Mac Pro (except that it's due for an update). They're both amazing machines. As far as the OLED strip, you make it sound like Apple's engineers don't consider any of these issues. But if you've already decided it's a giant fail based on zero experience with it, so be it, but I'm willing to give them more credit than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agustinbg
Pro users should have pro patience :)

Pro Users should have or already have moved on... I did. At least for now.
I really wanted a Mac Pro but for now I bought a used HP Z620 with two of the same Xeons as are in the "current" Mac Pro, 96GB of RAM, a NVIDIA GPU and an SSD for 1.8K The Mac Pro would have cost me 10K and still don't have dual CPU nor NVIDIA GPU (which I need for various Software and Renderers)

I am a single Artist and therefore much more flexible than even small studios who really need the have a roadmap they can base there Hardware and Platform Upgrades on. With the Pro being neglected like that it's a wonder if half of them sticks with Apple.
 
You mean like dropping all but a single port from the MacBook to force the user to choose between using USB peripherals and charging the laptop?

If the OLED strip is smooth and continuous without any physical distinction of the keys, or if it's not possible to feel the virtual keys and orient one's hand without activating them, then it's at a disadvantage to physical f-keys. Furthermore on an ostensibly a "pro" computer, F-key functions in different pro apps are naturally memorized with heavy usage so the user doesn't even need to look at them.

If I could sit down with Apple execs, I'd ask them two questions:
  1. What problem does this solve?
  2. Would any of you want the full keyboard on your work computer to be an OLED touch sensitive virtual keyboard? (looking at Ive) Imagine how thin such a laptop would be!

A single port is not a "gimmick" and if that doesn't suit you, it's okay — you're not the target market for that machine. Many users never plug USB devices into their laptop.

Judging a feature that we haven't seen yet is silly. Again, their engineers/designers are not idiots and they likely considered all of the imaginary problems you've envisioned. I'm not saying you're entirely wrong, but let's see if any of these problems actually manifest themselves as actual problems instead of the rampant speculation that they completely **** the bed?

You've seen the Apple patents for the completely virtual keyboard/control surfaces right?
 
Heh. It's not the iMac that bothers me so much as Apple's refusal to offer any other high end consumer desktop choice. The Mini is intentionally inadequate and the Mac Pro is what Apple's high end consumer desktop should be, except maybe smaller since it needs only an i7 with one consumer GPU.

This, I think, is what irks me about Apple most these days. They're making so much money, they can pretty much just do what they want and ignore their customers requests. There is an entire market of people just like you and I who want something more powerful than a Mini, but don't want the outlay of a Mac Pro, nor do they want the restricted 'all in one' of the iMac. But they simply don't need to listen it seems.

I don't want to have to go to a Hackintosh for my next system but I'm not sure what else to do. I prefer OSX by a country mile to Windows and Linux - so not sure what else I can do.
 
Agree. I "heard" rumor the "Air" line would retire in place of the MacBook. This would follow the "Tri" model lineup:

Three variations in each lineup:

- MacBook's: 12" MacBook, 13" and 15" MacBook Pro's (Retina)
- iMac: 21.5", 21.5" 4K, 27" 5K
- Mac mini: 1.4GHz, 2.6GHz, 2.8GHz
- Mac Pro: Quad-Core base discontinued, 6, 8, 12-Core
- iPad: 9.7", 10", 12.9"
- iPhone: 4", 4.7", 5.5"
You're ruling out the possibility of larger MacBooks. Also, all 1080p iMacs will be probably be discontinued by the end of next year.
[doublepost=1472546155][/doublepost]
I'm hoping the same for the MBP too. Hopefully that's not how they made it thinner ...
The new keyboard is significantly thinner, and considering it takes up most of the area above the electronics it'll likely be included. I don't mind it but I think implementing the redesigned scissor keyboard with new backlighting would be more acceptable for the target audience of the Pro.
[doublepost=1472546192][/doublepost]
14-inch MacBook, please!

I've been nice all year Santa Tim. :)
Probably next year with the Kaby Lake refresh.
 
I'm seriously thinking along the lines that half the reason the Mac Pro hasn't seen a refresh for so long is that when it does manifest, it won't be the same form factor as it is now. Just a gut feeling that the current trashcan has already exceeded or has already become too close to exceeding what the thermal core can handle in terms of heat/power that it can handle. A failed experiment, as it were. If a new design were to feature even the slightest hint of upgradability like the older cheesegrater models, in a size of say 3 or 4 current Mac Minis with less reliance on external cabled peripherals, I'd get excited about that...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chicane-UK
As far as the OLED strip, you make it sound like Apple's engineers don't consider any of these issues.

That's not how it works at Apple. The bean counters and industrial designers now rule Apple. With Ive in control of software interface design and hardware design I'd bet good money that he had a hand in this virtual F-key strip. His design record shows a gross neglect of function in favor of form, so I fully expect the virtual F-keys to look slick and be a function downgrade from physical f-keys.

Look at it this way: it's common to buy a physical keyboard to use in lieu of the virtual keys on a touchscreen device. Have you ever heard of anyone buying a virtual touchscreen keyboard to replace a physical keyboard?
 
Hmmm...new MacBook Pro + 5K Thunderbolt Display or new 5K iMac and keep my 12-inch MacBook for portability? Perhaps the ultimate first world problem of 2016;)

Pros/Cons of Option 1: MacBook Pro + 5K Display
Pros
  • Just one Mac to manage and worry about
  • More powerful portable
  • Display will last a long time
Cons
  • Less powerful desktop
  • Heavier portable
  • Need to plug in a cord every time you sit down

Pros/Cons of Option 2: 5K iMac and keep my 12-inch MacBook
Pros
  • No compromises, super powerful desktop
  • Ultra-portable notebook
Cons
  • Need to manage multiple Macs, using semi-unreliable services like Back to my Mac and iCloud to unify the file systems
  • Less powerful portable
Personally I'd go for option 1: one Mac to manage and two displays at the desk (I love working with two displays); the MBP is powerful enough for my personal and work needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriotInvasion
I'm well aware of the desktop class card benchmarks for the Vulkan API. They have been out quite a while now. Article you link is month and a half old.

What in the WORLD they have to do with our current discussion is another question entirely.

Did you really just cherry-pick the one desktop success AMD has had lately and proffer that as some sort of mobile gpu relevance??
First of all, Metal is based on Mantle, the same API that Vulkan is made of.
Secondly.
Don't you think that Polaris desktop lineup is somewhat indicator of the performance of Mobile GPUs from AMD, especially in new APIs? In DX11 AMD GPUs are bottlenecked by nature of the APIs, in DX12 and Vulkan, which both are based on Mantle, just like Metal, their performance jumps up.

We do not know what RX M480 really is. It can be cut down chip or it can be full, 1024 GCN core chip with 35W TDP.

You call me cherry picker, but what people are doing on this forum? Constantly repeating the same opinions about Nvidia, based on perception of brand.
 
Last edited:
I'm seriously thinking along the lines that half the reason the Mac Pro hasn't seen a refresh for so long is that when it does manifest, it won't be the same form factor as it is now. Just a gut feeling that the current trashcan has already exceeded or has already become too close to exceeding what the thermal core can handle in terms of heat/power that it can handle. A failed experiment, as it were. If a new design were to feature even the slightest hint of upgradability like the older cheesegrater models, in a size of say 3 or 4 current Mac Minis with less reliance on external cabled peripherals, I'd get excited about that...

Does seem like the trashcan was probably a failed experiment. I don't think Pro's were too happy having to have all their accessories hanging off the back of the thing, and much preferred internal upgrades like the previous and far superior form factor!
 
  • Like
Reactions: idunn
My 2012 iMac is still great, by far the best iMac I've had in terms of not slowing down, ability to connect, screen fade, 4 years in. But I did replace the hard drive last year after it failed.

So I don't really need a new one except that I should have got a 27" instead of this 21.5" - that'll make a big difference to my work. And I've got a crappy Amazon keyboard after i had an accident with the old one. So it's starting to look like I might upgrade this cycle - if so it'll be the first time in 20y I do so with a mac that's still running OK.
 
Pro Users should have or already have moved on... I did. At least for now.
I really wanted a Mac Pro but for now I bought a used HP Z620 with two of the same Xeons as are in the "current" Mac Pro, 96GB of RAM, a NVIDIA GPU and an SSD for 1.8K The Mac Pro would have cost me 10K and still don't have dual CPU nor NVIDIA GPU (which I need for various Software and Renderers)

I am a single Artist and therefore much more flexible than even small studios who really need the have a roadmap they can base there Hardware and Platform Upgrades on. With the Pro being neglected like that it's a wonder if half of them sticks with Apple.

I moved on too. I still have a 2012 Mac Pro 6-core 3.46 but seldom use it. I opted for a Z230 i7 with 32GB RAM and a Quadro GPU. For Photoshop working in Windows is so much more comfortable than on the Mac.
 



Apple is planning to refresh its Mac lineup, including the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air, as early as October, according to Bloomberg. The report also claims Apple is working on a standalone 5K display in partnership with LG Electronics, while it plans to update iMac models with an option for new graphics chips from AMD.

macbook_pros_2015.jpg

The report reiterates that the new MacBook Pro will be thinner and include an OLED-based touchscreen strip along the top of the flatter keyboard, which will present functions that dynamically fit the current task or application, as well as integrate Touch ID to enable users to quickly log in using their fingerprint.Apple has reportedly named the feature "Dynamic Function Row" internally, but its official name may differ when announced.

The tweaked MacBook Air models, meanwhile, are said to include multipurpose USB-C ports, which makes the inclusion of Thunderbolt 3 a possibility. No other details were shared about the planned MacBook Air and iMac refreshes.

macbook_airs_2015.jpg

Apple's plans to work with LG on a standalone 5K display surface two months after it discontinued the five-year-old Thunderbolt Display. It remains unclear if the monitor will be based upon the Retina 5K iMac, and it is also unclear if the report's broad late 2016 timeframe for "some of the new Mac products" includes the display.

The report makes it nearly certain that the focus of Apple's just-announced September 7 media event will be on the iPhone 7 and the second-generation Apple Watch, the latter of which has now been confirmed for the event. Apple will also provide updates about its software, including iOS 10, macOS Sierra, watchOS 3, and tvOS 10.

Article Link: Apple to Release New MacBook Pro and Air as Early as October, AMD iMacs and 5K Display With LG Also in Works
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.