LOL. Man you are hilarious.Finally, we are getting somewhere, trying to substantiate, now we can have a discussion about knowledge. (Despite the language)
Do you think these studies have any predictive value at all?
These studies confirm longstanding understanding of the human immune systems and viruses. A better question might be....what if they have no predictive value? Who cares because I wasn’t writing a dissertation on natural immunity and the pandemic. Some ignorant people (like you) who dont know CV19 data were repeating stuff we didnt know in May 2020 as if it was relevant today and that they hear on TV and I corrected them (and you) with a simple statement and you got involved because I guess you thought you were clever but you also dont know the data....
The studies answer the question people were debating ..... (drumroll) if the vaccine is better than natural immunity to the best of current knowledge at granting durable immunity. These studies confirm that natural immunity is better in Sept 2021 after we have been dealing with CV19 for 18 months. Thats was all I was saying...these studies confirm it. Its not a big deal. Its a simple But important point. I am sure you will link to some other thing you think is convincing that you havent actually read but that shows you can search the internet like a champ. I read those studies I linked to and am familiar with them. Thats why I knew you didnt know the current data and then you linked to something no one current on CV19 controversies would link to.
Last edited: