Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think the 5k iMac was an anomalously insane value considering the quality display you were getting with the Mac computer. Makes much more sense to compare this display to other similar standalone displays in the industry.

As long as one remembers that the only similar standalone displays in the industry are the $900 iiyama and $1300 LG. ;)

Which is my point I guess. The LG has never been known to sell well. In fact, it seems to have proven to the rest of the world that there is no market for 5K monitors.

Yes, only macOS really benefits from high-PPI displays, but Apple has made that a selling point for macOS and is not going to ship a low-PPI display like almost every display on the market just to hit a price point. It is surely one of the reasons that Apple 27" Thunderbolt display was scrapped after the 27" iMac went 5K - as nice as a display as it was, it still looked pretty poor when connected to an iMac 5K (I know as I had an ATD paired to an iMac 5K for years).

And even if the LG 5K sold like crap, it did so in part because it was not a very good display for it's price. The iMac 5K was a better display across the board because Apple worked harder on out-of-the-box uniformity and calibration.

Apple also knows exactly how many iMac 5Ks they sold as well as how many LG displays they sold via the online and retail Apple Stores. And clearly those sales were enough to invest in a new standalone 5K display.
 
Hi. Does anyone know if it’s only meant to be used with a Mac computer? Or can it be used with other sources of video as well? Thank you.
 
I feel just a little sad for my 7-year-old 5K Retina iMac. It was the first iMac I ever bought, or even seriously considered. Now, it looks like it will be the last.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcomer
Basically, this monitor starts at $1,999. Nobody buys a non-height adjustable monitor these days.
I just did. I’ll be mounting them on my dual-display wall-mounted Ergotron arm, which will provide a much greater range of motion than the Apple stand. I’m happy. (Technically, I guess I would be a little happier if not getting any stand had been cheaper, as both VESA and and stand are typically included with other monitors. At least I’m not paying more, and Apple is saving me the hassle of storing a stand I will never use, so there’s always that.)

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras
I will certainly shell out for this. I have had an Apple Thunderbolt Display since 2012 and it still works great. All my friends over the years have had to buy new monitors in that time because the quality was subpar. The haters complain about the pricing, but I have always said the internals are always top notch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras
This is essentially the replacement for the 27" iMac. If you want a base, pair it with the base M1 mini. If you want to replace an iMac Pro, pair it with the Mac Studio. While it would have been nice if Apple had introduced this display 2 years ago, it still makes sense for them to release it now. Higher refresh rates, OLED, etc. mostly benefit gamers, which this display isn't intended for.

Considering that LG charged $1,300 for the UltraFine 5K, $1,600 for this isn't outrageous. The screen is a bit brighter, it offers a nano option, it's more aesthetically compatible with the Mac, and has a better camera and speakers. Most people who already have the LG display probably won't find a reason to switch, but this is a nice display for its intended purpose.

I can get behind the 27" iMac comparison. It does make more sense in that way even though this would still be a decent price increase over that.

2 nitpicks. High refresh, local dimming, HDR are not solely a benefit to gamers. All of those features are beneficial to all end users particularly those creating and consuming content. Also, using one overpriced product (LG UltraFine) to justify another's high price doesn't work for me.
 
OK how do I plug this into my existing 2014 Mac Mini or 2012 MBP? :p

Apple Thunderbolt 3 cable connected directly to the Apple Studio Display and then to your mini / MBP via an Apple Thunderbolt 3 to 2 adapter.

It should work with the Mac mini's TB2 port and should work with the MacBook Pro's miniDP port.


EDIT - Then again, see below. :(
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JosephAW
Hi. Does anyone know if it’s only meant to be used with a Mac computer? Or can it be used with other sources of video as well? Thank you.

It seems as if it is only compatible with newer Macs, see https://www.apple.com/studio-display/specs/:

Compatibility
Studio Display is compatible with the following Mac models running macOS Monterey 12.3 or later:
  • Mac Studio (2022)
  • 16-inch MacBook Pro (2019 or later)
  • 14-inch MacBook Pro (2021)
  • 13-inch MacBook Pro (2016 or later)
  • 15-inch MacBook Pro (2016 or later)
  • MacBook Air (2018 or later)
  • Mac mini (2018 or later)
  • Mac Pro (2019 or later)
  • 24-inch iMac (2021)
  • 27-inch iMac (2017 or later)
  • 21.5-inch iMac (2017 or later)
  • iMac Pro (2017)
Studio Display is compatible with the following iPad models running iPadOS 15.4 or later:2
  • iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation or later)
  • iPad Pro 11-inch
  • iPad Air (5th generation)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Populus
I wonder if you can hook up consoles with an adapter. Can someone who buys the display try it and report back to us?
 
It seems as if it is only compatible with newer Macs, see https://www.apple.com/studio-display/specs/:

Compatibility
Studio Display is compatible with the following Mac models running macOS Monterey 12.3 or later:
  • Mac Studio (2022)
  • 16-inch MacBook Pro (2019 or later)
  • 14-inch MacBook Pro (2021)
  • 13-inch MacBook Pro (2016 or later)
  • 15-inch MacBook Pro (2016 or later)
  • MacBook Air (2018 or later)
  • Mac mini (2018 or later)
  • Mac Pro (2019 or later)
  • 24-inch iMac (2021)
  • 27-inch iMac (2017 or later)
  • 21.5-inch iMac (2017 or later)
  • iMac Pro (2017)
Studio Display is compatible with the following iPad models running iPadOS 15.4 or later:2
  • iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation or later)
  • iPad Pro 11-inch
  • iPad Air (5th generation)
Thank you. I reacted with a laughing emoji because I find it hilarious that You cannot use your monitor with all your devices… but I appreciate your answer
 
  • Like
Reactions: nothingtoseehere
It seems as if it is only compatible with newer Macs, see https://www.apple.com/studio-display/specs/:

Be interesting to see if this is an actual hard(ware) limit or if Apple is just listing the machines they officially support and will only provide technical support on.

I am sure some enterprising folks will try connecting it with older Mac hardware as well as PC hardware to see if it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
Wow slim pickings. But how similar are they?

The iiyama is significantly cheaper, but lacks any macOS integration and uses DisplayPort for connectivity so you would need to dedicate two TB4/USB4 ports (one for video to the DP input and one for data to the USB input).

The LG does have (somewhat buggy) macOS integration and sends both video and data over a single TB3/TB4 cable so you need only use one port on the Mac.

Compared to both, the Apple Studio display will have excellent macOS integration, better image quality out of the box (Apple does more calibration), better build quality, a vastly better webcam and much better speakers.

For me, that easily makes the Studio Display worth $300 more than the LG and still makes it worth 50% more than the iiyama.
 
Like a few have said, I hope this will work with a Windows computer. I suspect Apple didn’t want to list non-Apple devices that can also work with the display. Or maybe it’s telling the complete truth. I hope not
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
Only 1 TB port is kind of a bummer since that means you'll have to use a dock or 2 TB cables to your Macbook for a dual Studio Display setup.
It's a display... wouldn't expect it to have the number ports as the computer you're connecting it to, where extra ports belong.
 
Hmmm. I dunno. Yes - a fantastic monitor and long overdue. A touch pricey but I can live with that. But just one Thunderbolt port? Daisy-chaining displays, Apple? And no built in Ethernet port? So not quite the drop in replacement for my Thunderbolt 27 that I was hoping for. If my TB dies, no doubt I’ll upgrade. But as it stands, I don’t think Apple has done enough to make me want to retire my fully working TB displays. Maybe once I get to see one in the store…

Also, obviously it’s ridiculous to charge so much more for a height adjustable stand. Go for the VESA mount for free and use a third party arm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
So its a standard LCD displaymonitor with good antireflection for 2000... ok. QD-Oled monitor coming up looks much more appealing

They should just buy a proper display-company so that they can make decent stuff, like AUO, just buy it. And buy a car manufacturer as well lol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: eulslix
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.