It is to encourage you to buy one.And why can't one unlock ones Mac with their iPhone?? Why only the watch.
It is to encourage you to buy one.And why can't one unlock ones Mac with their iPhone?? Why only the watch.
No they aren't. But they're good at under the hood stuff, not shiny user features.
Yes, the iPhone company should try getting one desktop OSX really stable.Such update should work on anything that supports the buggy El Capitan.
10.11.5 doesn't still feel that polished. Maybe it starts to feel as a .0 or .1 release.Will update to final release of El Capitan when it becomes available.
I'm not upgrading this until at least .5 when everything is stable.
Early iMac 2009 = Core 2 Duo, and Late iMac 2009 = Core 2 Duo, yet only one of the two is supported... Thanks, Apple.
What's wrong with the file system?
I don't see anything relating to …
How can they be exciting and meh ad the same time....it is either orexciting but meh
- Clones is similar to deduplication
It was System "number", than Mac OS "number" , then OS X and now that we go Back to macOS they make it look like it is a step forwardUgh macOS sounds terrible. I much prefer the OSX branding (despite being on the 12th 10th edition...)
I'm talking about Apple's completely outdated OpenGL and the mobile-grade-graphics-on-a-desktop Metal.What is wrong with OS X graphics API/ GPU? You not happy that it is not touch screen? It not like windows 8 that is touch screen?
It will probably come next year. It has still issues. http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/0...ocumentation-for-apfs-apples-new-file-system/Seriously, best news of the day. Surprised they didn't mention it.
After 3 years of not dropping anything, I'm find with that. There would be too much bloat at this point to retain compatibility.They dropped quite a bit of hardware this time.
What would you have like to see in addition to this? The Mac is very mature at this point.Some nifty handy features... But waiting an entire year for this? Bit disappointing.
That was discussed many times already.
Since it comes with a Mac and you do not pay separately it is FREE.
Of course within Apple's internal calculation it is part of the overall costs.
The way consumers look at FREE is that if they do not have to pay cash it's FREE!
If you have an older Mac and over the years have always upgraded and thus never paid for the upgrade it is FREE.
When we had to pay $ 25 or so, it was not FREE.
If we want to start assigning costs to something we don't pay for or something that is included with a product, without knowing it's real costs, that's hair splitting.
Same as companies giving you FREE phones with a contract, buy one get one FREE offers etc. of course all in there some place. That applies even to FREE parking
Marketing and advertising at it's finest.
I hear you, I've got the very same machine. I'm willing to bet it would still be plenty capable to run Sierra and I'm curious to know the technical reasons - if any - why support for it was dropped.
Apple wants to see your files .
Noone who does some actual computing will ever use, or has used , iCloud .
Good news Apple will now offer Mac to Mac syncing, offline of course, after decades of 'it just works' .
Oh, wait ....
They should have worked on simplifying the OS instead.
dmg files? My bro in law has them all over his desktop because he doesn't know you can trash them.
Downloaded files should open and install with one click, automate the rest.
macOS? Really? That looks better to Cook than MacOS?
Free? You buy it together with a Mac computer.