I know my mid-2009 MBP is old, but if it can run El Capitan, why shouldn't it be able to run Sierra?Engadget got it:
MacBook, iMac: Late 2009 or later
MacBook Air/Pro, Mac Mini/Pro: 2010 or later
Xserve support is officially discontinued
![]()
Metal is dead. No dev interest or support. Apple's refusal to support Vulkan is hurting devs and is based purely upon pride and hubris. They need to accept that Metal is a failure and give devs what they need.
...But Apple thought adding all those gimmicks to Messages was more important.
End of spinning HDDs?
You can't be serious. What about a modern file system? What about a modern, competitive graphics API? What about a better file manager? What about a reworked App Store? You know, just the unimportant details…![]()
… he doesn't know you can trash them. …
… help you find and remove old files you no longer use …
Easily get rid of duplicate and obsolete files.
macOS Sierra can keep unneeded files from cluttering up your Mac. It reminds you to delete used app installers, and clears out duplicate downloads, caches, logs, and other unnecessary stuff. …
So you're complaining about the lack of new features but you don't need the new features. It all makes sense now.For what I use OS X for I don't need anymore features, or rather the features offered each year either don't appeal to me or aren't relevant. There's no point upgrading for the sake of upgrading. I believe the phrase is "it just works".
Personally software I use for work doesn't work on Mavericks or beyond so I have to stay on Mountain Lion for that respect, but even if I did Yosemite would be the highest I'd go. El Cap was a bland release and Sierra looks even worse.
Don't you miss the cats name?Its a decent incremental update, I'm not overly jazzed up over the update. I'm no fan of the California names, but I do like Mac OS
Why do we need three naming identifiers of this. macOS Sierra 10.12.xx?
How about this?
The Apple File System (APFS) is the next-generation file system designed to scale from an Apple Watch to a Mac Pro. APFS is optimized for Flash/SSD storage, and engineered with encryption as a primary feature.
Can anyone explain what the changes to iCloud Drive are? The description is very vague. I thought you could already share your files between your Mac, iPhone and iPad. At least that is what I'm doing now. What does this change provide that I can't do now?
I can't wrap my head around this feature: does Apple actually think it's a good idea to mess around with their users' files?
Pretty excited for this, finally Siri!
But with no continuity......so most of the features will not apply to our machines.According to Apple, my 2011 iMac will continue to live on!
With the cheap SSD's available these days I really cannot see the point of this at all. The example they gave in the keynote would use 3 months worth of my satellite Internet allowance! No mention of cost either. Surely such massive amounts of data using iCloud wouldn't be free?
[doublepost=1465859904][/doublepost]
Am I alone in thinking that talking to a computer is an utterly pointless novelty exercise? Someone at Apple has been watching too much Star Trek. I like to use a computer, not talk to it. I'll never have a driverless car for a similar reason...I like driving.
Post merged...how the hell did that happen? Wasn't me!